Patient-Centered Support for Contraceptive Decision-Making
1 other identifier
interventional
786
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The investigators have designed a tablet-based decision support tool to help women learn more about their birth control options and support them in choosing a method they are happy with. The investigators will test whether the decision support tool helps women choose a birth control method they can continue using successfully by having some women use the tool before their birth control-related visit to a health care provider, and some women not use the tool before their visit. The investigators will then follow up with all the women at four months and seven months after their visit to see if they are still using the birth control method they chose at the visit and how happy they are with the method. Hypotheses:
- 1.Women who use the contraceptive decision support tool will be more likely to continue using their chosen method at 4 and 7 months follow-up, compared to women who receive usual care.
- 2.The contraceptive decision support tool will increase women's knowledge, choice of, and use of highly effective reversible contraception, compared to usual care.
- 3.The contraceptive decision support tool will decrease decision conflict, compared to usual care.
- 4.The contraceptive decision support tool will increase patient satisfaction with the clinic visit and with their method, compared to usual care.
- 5.Women who use the contraceptive decision support tool will have fewer unintended pregnancies during the follow-up period, compared to women who received usual care.
- 6.The contraceptive decision support tool will increase shared patient-provider decision making in contraceptive counseling visits, compared to usual care.
- 7.The contraceptive decision support tool will decrease provider frustration when providing contraceptive counseling and increase provider job satisfaction.
- 8.Women using the tool will be more likely to report use of any moderately or highly effective method of contraception at 4 and 7 months follow-up, compared to women not using the tool.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 25, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 5, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 19, 2018
CompletedNovember 19, 2018
April 1, 2018
2 years
February 25, 2014
July 7, 2017
April 30, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Contraceptive Continuation
Whether or not a participant is still using the contraceptive method she selected at baseline.
4 and 7 months post-enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (18)
Patient Contraceptive Counseling Satisfaction
Baseline, post-visit survey
Patient Satisfaction With Information Received About Side Effects During Counseling
Baseline (post-visit survey)
Overall Satisfaction With Visit
Baseline (post-visit survey)
Shared Decision Making - Feelings About Provider Involvement
Baseline (post-visit) and up to 24 months
Shared Decision Making - Provider Appropriately Expressed Preference
Baseline (post-visit survey)
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (4)
Choice of a Highly Effective Method of Contraception at Baseline
Baseline (post-visit survey)
Use of a Highly Effective Method of Contraception at 4 and 7 Months Follow-up.
4 and 7 months post-enrollment
Use of Any Moderately or Highly Effective Method of Contraception at 4 and 7 Months Follow-up
4 and 7 months post-enrollment
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Contraceptive Decision Support Tool
EXPERIMENTALPatients whose contraceptive counseling visits are scheduled with providers randomized to this arm will use the intervention immediately before their visit and bring the generated printout to their visit. Providers randomized to this arm will be free to integrate the tool and printout into their contraceptive counseling however they see fit.
Usual Care (Control)
NO INTERVENTIONPatients in this arm will receive usual family planning care.
Interventions
The decision support tool: * Provides an educational session about different aspects of contraception * Elicits patient preferences about different aspects of contraception * Identifies potential contraindications to certain contraceptive methods * Allows the patient to view details about and compare available contraceptive methods * Suggests methods most appropriate based on the patient's preferences * Collects questions the patient may have for her provider * Generates a printout the patient can bring to her contraceptive counseling visit
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients
- Women of reproductive age (15-45)
- Wish to discuss starting or changing a contraceptive method during their visit
- Speak, read, and understand English or Spanish (Note: for the pre- and post-intervention audio recording phases, only patients who can speak, read, and understand English easily will be enrolled.)
- History of sexual activity with men
- Providers
- Provide contraceptive counseling in one of the participating clinics
- Plan to remain in job role for at least six months
- Clinic staff
- Work at one of the participating clinics
- Had a job that included patient contact, but did not solely consist of family planning counseling at the time of the implementation of the intervention
You may not qualify if:
- Patients
- Previously enrolled in the study
- Previously used the decision support tool at the Women's Community Clinic in San Francisco
- Are unable to get pregnant
- Appointment reason is for insertion of IUD or contraceptive implant
- Currently pregnant
- Desire pregnancy currently or in the next seven months (Note: The last criterion is designed to ensure we will have limited numbers of women that will discontinue their contraceptive methods during the study due to planning a pregnancy.)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
San Francisco City Clinic
San Francisco, California, 94103, United States
Planned Parenthood San Francisco Health Center
San Francisco, California, 94110, United States
San Francisco General Hospital Family Planning Clinic
San Francisco, California, 94110, United States
City College of San Francisco Student Health Services
San Francisco, California, 94112, United States
Related Publications (2)
Holt K, Kimport K, Kuppermann M, Fitzpatrick J, Steinauer J, Dehlendorf C. Patient-provider communication before and after implementation of the contraceptive decision support tool My Birth Control. Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Feb;103(2):315-320. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
PMID: 31537316DERIVEDDehlendorf C, Fitzpatrick J, Fox E, Holt K, Vittinghoff E, Reed R, Campora MP, Sokoloff A, Kuppermann M. Cluster randomized trial of a patient-centered contraceptive decision support tool, My Birth Control. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;220(6):565.e1-565.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.015. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
PMID: 30763545DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Limitations include potential for contamination between provider arms, our inability to blind patients or providers due to the nature of the intervention, and the potential for unobserved differences between patient arms due to cluster randomization.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Christine Dehlendorf, Principal Investigator
- Organization
- University of California, San Francisco
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christine Dehlendorf, MD, MAS
University of California, San Francisco
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 25, 2014
First Posted
March 5, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
October 1, 2016
Study Completion
October 1, 2016
Last Updated
November 19, 2018
Results First Posted
November 19, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04