To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of (18F-FCH) Comparing With (18F-FDG) for Detecting Hepatocellular Carcinoma
A Phase III, Multi-center, Single-blind, Cross-over Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 18Ffluorocholine (18F-FCH) Comparing With 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) for Detecting Hepatocellular Carcinoma
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Liver cancer is a major cause of death among patients of east or southeast asian descent, as well as other population groups, notably in central and west Africa. Diagnosis of liver cancer requires a combination of several imaging techniques and biopsies. Despite this, diagnosis can remain inconclusive or difficult to establish in patients at risk for liver cancer. The purpose of this multi-center trial is to evaluate novel imaging methods developed to diagnose the most common form of liver cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma. We propose to use novel imaging probes that have been reported to bind to liver cancers but not benign liver lesions that can be confused with liver cancer. Two such imaging probes will be evaluated. 2-\[18F\]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose, called \[18F\]FDG, is a radioactive sugar that is widely used for cancer imaging with a device called positron emission tomography, or PET scans. We already know that \[18F\]FDG cannot detect some liver cancers that are slow growing. \[18F\]Fluorocholine (\[18F\]FCH), another molecule, has been recently reported to be highly effective at detecting liver cancer. In 2010, a French researcher reported 80-90% detection rate by using \[18F\]FCH alone or in combination with \[18F\]FDG. We will compare \[18F\]FCH and \[18F\]FDG in evaluating 150 patients over a period of two years. The results will be correlated with those of biopsies and clinical follow-up. This study will provide valuable data on whether these imaging agents can successfully differentiate malignant liver lesions from benign ones. It will also provide information about whether these imaging agents can successfully assess whether the cancer has spread outside the liver. It will provide data that will allow physicians to determine the optimal imaging protocol to properly diagnose liver cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 hepatocellular-carcinoma
Started Feb 2014
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 hepatocellular-carcinoma
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 26, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 28, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedFebruary 28, 2014
February 1, 2014
1.1 years
February 26, 2014
February 27, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The pathological diagnosis of the liver tumor will be compared with the test result of the PET/CT scan findings.
After the study cases finished the two PET/CT scans, the cases will be followed as long as 6 months thereafter. Within this time frame, the study cases will go for a patho-histological diagnosis of the liver tumor. This will be used as the primary outcome.
Within 6 months of follow up after the PET/CT scans.
Study Arms (2)
FCH PET/CT scan results
EXPERIMENTALPET/CT scan results with FCH intravenous injection
FDG PET/CT scan
ACTIVE COMPARATORPET/CT scan results with FDG intravenous injection
Interventions
To compare the diagnostic efficacy of FCH PET scan to FDG PET scan.
To compare the diagnostic efficacy of FCH PET scan to FDG PET scan
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female, age ≥ 20 years old.
- Patient who accepts to enter the study by signing written informed consent.
- Patient with performance status ≤ 2 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG).
- Patient with cirrhosis or chronic liver diseases suspected to have at least 1 hepatic nodule larger than 1 cm in diameter detected by conventional image (US, CT, MRI). Patient who has not yet received any therapy relevant to the aforementioned diagnosis. Hepatic nodule is defined as any one of the following conditions: suspicious hepatocellular carcinoma, benign tumor such as hemangioma, adenoma or focal nodular hyperplasia, metastatic lesions from other primary malignancy.
- Female patient must take reliable contraception method(s) during the participation of the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient has serious allergic history or known allergy to 18F-FDG or 18F-FCH.
- Patient has been diagnosed of multiple malignancies.
- Female patient who is pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant during the study.
- Patient has been participated in other investigational trials within 28 days prior to study enrollment.
- Patient is unable to undergo PET/CT scan.
- Subjects with active systemic infections, or medical conditions that may significantly affect action, adequate uptake and elimination of radiotracer.
- Subject with conditions judged by the investigator as unsuitable for the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 10002, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kai-Yuan Tzen, MD
National Taiwan University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2014
First Posted
February 28, 2014
Study Start
February 1, 2014
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
February 28, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-02