Impact of Socio-aesthetic Care in the Quality of Life of Patients Treated for Lymphoma During and After Hospitalization
CareSSE
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In the early 2000s , professional and patient organizations are mobilizing to highlight the psychosocial impact of cancer disease , not only during but also after the acute phase. In 2003, the government launched the Cancer Plan I reinforced in December 2011 by the Cancer Plan II whose objectives include : " Develop a personalized care taking into account the pain and psychological and social support " and " increase opportunities for patients to benefit from supportive care "and" promote the professional integration . This study aims to show that beyond the immediate benefits of the social aesthetic cares in hospital (direct soothing, improving the quality of the skin injured by chemotherapy , feeling of escape ... ), these treatments can also affect quality of life for patients during and after hospitalization. They also may have an impact on the maintenance of social and / or professional satisfactory throughout the planned chemotherapy aplastic period .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable lymphoma
Started Jan 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 20, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2016
CompletedJune 16, 2016
June 1, 2016
2 years
February 20, 2014
June 15, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality of life score
* For patients in control group, arbitrarily during their fifth cycle of chemotherapy * For patients in interventional group during the course of chemotherapy after the third socio-aesthetic care, or at the latest, at the sixth treatment.
Change form baseline in Quality of life score at an average of 5 months (4 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy).
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Coopersmith Self-esteem inventory
Change form baseline in Coopersmith Self-esteem inventory score at an average of 5 months (4 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy).
Body Image Scale assessment
Change form baseline in body image scale assessment score at an average of 5 months (4 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy).
Social life assessment
Change form baseline in social life assessment score at an average of 5 months (4 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy).
Study Arms (2)
without socio-asthetic care
NO INTERVENTIONwith socio-aesthetic cares
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
* care of the face * skin cleansing with cleansing milk to remove impurities * a gentle scrub to exfoliate and cleanse the skin * a relaxing massage * moisturizing mask * application of a moisturizer suited to specific patient skin: skin reactivity, dehydration ... * care manicure / pedicure, * massages * makeup, advice (scarves, wigs care products adapted to the skin changes ...) and helping relationship.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- to 65 years old
- Hospitalized in the Hematology care unit in UH Angers
- Initial Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma
- Without previous socio-aesthetic care.
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<18 years old.
- Patient protected by the law.
- Patient at end of life.
- Patient unable to respond to the questionnaire.
- Previous Socio aesthetic care.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hematology Care Unit - UH Angers
Angers, 49000, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 20, 2014
First Posted
February 26, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
January 1, 2016
Study Completion
January 1, 2016
Last Updated
June 16, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-06