Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty, the Correlation to CT Scans and Clinical Results
1 other identifier
observational
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Total knee replacement is one of the most commonly performed orthopedic procedures. As of 2010, about 600,000 total knee replacements were being performed annually in the United States and these numbers are rising. The normal knee joint functions as a complex hinge allowing primarily flexion and extension, rotation and gliding. The knee joint is made up of three compartments, the lateral, medial and anterior (patellofemoral). Damage to the cartilage of one or more compartments may be the result of osteoarthritis (idiopathic or post-traumatic), inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid,psoriatic, etc.), a-vascular necrosis, tumors, or congenital deformities. Osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis are the causes of the overwhelming majority of total joint arthroplasties. A successful Total knee arthroplasty(TKA) surgery includes: an accurate alignment( the mechanical axis in axial and rotational planes), as well as significant pain relief which improves function and quality of life. Incorrect alignment can lead to abnormal wear, premature mechanical loosening of the components and patellofemoral problems. The common techniques for Total knee replacement are:
- 1.Conventional method TKR
- 2.CT/MRI-based preoperative navigated TKR
- 3.Image-free intraoperative navigated TKR In our research we focus on the 3rd method using the Orthopilot navigation system Aesculap®, Tutlingen, Germany. This system is an active PC based guiding system that helps the surgeon decide on the accurate alignment and orientation of the implant and cutting surfaces of the bone and thus avoid incorrect alignment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2013
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2014
CompletedFebruary 26, 2014
February 1, 2014
6 months
February 18, 2014
February 22, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
limb axis measurement
surview CT images pre-( 1 week before the operation) and post-operatively(the day of operation) will be analyzed using the Traumacad software for limb axis. The navigation system results pre- and post-operatively will be given by the computer as an output at the Operation Theater. The results will be recorded for Varus/Valgus and degrees of deformity.
An average, 1 week preoperatively up to 3 days postoperatively.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Clinical outcome and function
up to 6 months postoperatively
Study Arms (1)
Navigation
Eligibility Criteria
patients undergoing navigated total knee replacement
You may qualify if:
- age over 18
- severe osteoarthrosis of the knee
- failure of conservative treatment.
You may not qualify if:
- patients with severe vascular disease
- secondary knee deformation due to muscular atrophy or disease
- active infection
- morbid obesity
- neuropathic knee and osteomyelitis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ziv Hospitallead
Study Sites (1)
ZIV medical center
Safed, Israel
Related Publications (6)
Mason JB, Fehring T, Fahrbach K. Navigated total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Nov;89(11):2547-8; author reply 2548; discussion 2548-50. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200711000-00032. No abstract available.
PMID: 17974899RESULTKurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
PMID: 17403800RESULTOswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E, Hoogewoud HM. Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1993 Aug;8(4):419-26. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(06)80042-2.
PMID: 8409995RESULTWasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty RM, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg AG. Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Feb;(299):31-43.
PMID: 8119035RESULTBargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MA. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Mar;(173):178-83.
PMID: 6825330RESULTBerger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Jan;(286):40-7.
PMID: 8425366RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David E Rothem, MD
Head of joint repalcement unit, Orthopedic department, Ziv medical center, Safed, Israel
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2014
First Posted
February 26, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2013
Primary Completion
January 1, 2014
Study Completion
January 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 26, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-02