Limbal Relaxing Incision Versus Toric Intraocular Lens for Corneal Astigmatism During Cataract Surgery.
Limbal Relaxing Incisions Versus Toric Intraocular Lens for Keratometric Astigmatism <2.5 Diopters in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery and Intraocular Lens Implantation.
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare toric intra-ocular lens (IOL) with limbal relaxing incisions (LRI) in correcting astigmatism in patient undergoing standard cataract surgery. Astigmatism is unequal curvature of the eye; the eye is oval rather than spherical. Uncorrected astigmatism of greater than approximately 0.75 diopters (D) can cause visual blurring, ghosting of images or halos. Over 20% of patients undergoing cataract surgery have astigmatism which is likely to have been corrected by spectacles. Cataract surgery involves the replacement of the natural opacifying crystalline lens with a clear artificial plastic intra-ocular lens (IOL). The lens power can be selected to correct the patient's glasses prescription. The most widely used IOLs only correct glasses at one distance i.e. either near or distance. Residual astigmatism after cataract surgery will need glasses for correction which is undesirable for many patients. Limbal relaxing incisions (LRI) are circumferential partial thickness cuts to the clear window of the eye (cornea) during surgery. These LRIs can correct corneal astigmatism and have no additional risk of complications. Alternatively, toric IOLs are available which correct astigmatism inside the eye. They have been available for routine use in the last few years; technology has markedly improved and the lenses have become cheaper. Studies have suggested toric IOLs provide better vision after cataract surgery than the regular IOLs. Toric IOL are widely used in the private practice and increasingly in the National Health Service (NHS). LRIs are cost effective for treating astigmatism however their predictability is believed to be lower than toric IOLs. As there are no randomised controlled trials comparing the outcomes between LRIs and toric IOLs. This research will address this gap in knowledge and accordingly from this research future practice will be able to provide treatment to patients with information about the best outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 17, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedDecember 2, 2014
November 1, 2014
1.5 years
February 17, 2014
November 27, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Unaided distance LogMAR visual acuity (UDVA)
1 months
Unaided distance LogMAR visual acuity (UDVA)
3 months
Unaided distance LogMAR visual acuity (UDVA)
6 months
Unaided distance LogMAR visual acuity (UDVA)
12 months
Study Arms (2)
Toric Intraocular lens
EXPERIMENTALToric intraocular lens implantation during standard cataract surgery
Limbal Relaxing Incisions
EXPERIMENTALLimbal relaxing incisions during standard cataract surgery
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Symptomatic cataract for which the patient desires surgery
- Corneal astigmatism of greater than or equal to 0.75 D and lesser than or equal to 2.5D.
- No significant ophthalmic co-morbidity which would affect the postoperative visual outcomes.
You may not qualify if:
- \<18 years of age
- Significant ophthalmic comorbidity detrimental to final visual outcomes
- Not competent to give consent
- Concurrent use of ocular medications including lubricants
- Unable to attend follow ups at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Christin Heneinlead
- Rayner Intraocular Lenses Limitedcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Sussex Eye Hospital
Brighton, BN2 5BF, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Academic Foundation Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 17, 2014
First Posted
February 20, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 2, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-11