Success Metrics

Clinical Success Rate
100.0%

Based on 1 completed trials

Completion Rate
100%(1/1)
Active Trials
0(0%)
Results Posted
0%(0 trials)

Phase Distribution

Ph not_applicable
2
67%
Ph phase_1
1
33%

Phase Distribution

1

Early Stage

0

Mid Stage

0

Late Stage

Phase Distribution3 total trials
Phase 1Safety & dosage
1(33.3%)
N/ANon-phased studies
2(66.7%)

Highest Phase Reached

Phase 1

Trial Status & Enrollment

Completion Rate

100.0%

1 of 1 finished

Non-Completion Rate

0.0%

0 ended early

Currently Active

0

trials recruiting

Total Trials

3

all time

Status Distribution
Active(1)
Completed(1)
Other(1)

Detailed Status

unknown1
Completed1
Not yet recruiting1

Development Timeline

Analytics

Development Status

Total Trials
3
Active
0
Success Rate
100.0%
Most Advanced
Phase 1

Trials by Phase

Phase 11 (33.3%)
N/A2 (66.7%)

Trials by Status

unknown133%
completed133%
not_yet_recruiting133%

Recent Activity

0 active trials
Showing 3 of 3
not_yet_recruitingphase_1

Effectiveness and Safety of Limbal Relaxing Incisions for Correcting Post Phacoemulsification High Astigmatism

NCT06896357
completednot_applicable

Manually Performed Limbal Relaxing Incisions vs Femtosecond Laser-guided Astigmatic Keratotomy

NCT03264534
unknownnot_applicable

Limbal Relaxing Incision Versus Toric Intraocular Lens for Corneal Astigmatism During Cataract Surgery.

NCT02067429

Clinical Trials (3)

Showing 3 of 3 trials
NCT06896357Phase 1

Effectiveness and Safety of Limbal Relaxing Incisions for Correcting Post Phacoemulsification High Astigmatism

Not Yet Recruiting
NCT03264534Not Applicable

Manually Performed Limbal Relaxing Incisions vs Femtosecond Laser-guided Astigmatic Keratotomy

Completed
NCT02067429Not Applicable

Limbal Relaxing Incision Versus Toric Intraocular Lens for Corneal Astigmatism During Cataract Surgery.

Unknown

All 3 trials loaded

Drug Details

Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Total Trials
3