Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Arhalofenate for Preventing Flares and Reducing Serum Uric Acid in Gout Patients
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active and Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Arhalofenate for Preventing Flares and Reducing Serum Uric Acid in Gout Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
248
3 countries
56
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether arhalofenate is effective in preventing flares and reducing serum uric acid in gout patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Mar 2014
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
56 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 12, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 17, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2015
CompletedJanuary 29, 2018
January 1, 2018
10 months
February 12, 2014
January 25, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The incidence of flares (mean number of flares per patient) from baseline through Week 12 in the arhalofenate 800 mg group compared to the allopurinol 300 mg group.
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Percent sUA reduction from baseline to Week 12 in the arhalofenate 800 mg group compared to the placebo group
12 weeks
Percent sUA reduction from baseline to Week 12 in the arhalofenate 600 mg group compared to the placebo group
12 weeks
Proportion of patients with sUA < 6 mg/dL at Week 12 in the arhalofenate 800 mg group compared to the placebo group
12 weeks
The incidence of flares from baseline through Week 12 in the arhalofenate 600 mg group compared to the allopurinol 300 mg group
12 weeks
Proportion of patients with sUA < 6 mg/dL at Week 12 in the arhalofenate 600 mg group compared to placebo group
12 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (14)
Proportion of patients experiencing at least one flare from baseline through Week 12
12 weeks
Proportion of patients experiencing two or more flares from baseline through Week 12
12 weeks
The incidence of flares from baseline through Week 4, from Week 5 through Week 8, and from Week 9 through Week 12
12 weeks
- +11 more other outcomes
Study Arms (5)
Arhalofenate 600 mg
EXPERIMENTALArhalofenate 800 mg
EXPERIMENTALAllopurinol 300 mg; colchicine 0.6 mg
ACTIVE COMPARATORAllopurinol 300 mg
ACTIVE COMPARATORPlacebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Allopurinol 300 mg tablets once daily for 12 weeks
Colchicine 0.6 mg over-encapsulated tablets once daily for 12 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female patients between 18 and 75 years of age, inclusive
- Known gout diagnosis (per criteria of the American Rheumatism Association for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout, see Appendix 3)
- At least three patient-reported and documented flares during the 12 months prior to screening (the first of these flares may have resulted in the gout diagnosis; any recent flare must have resolved, with the patient back to usual comfort level at least seven days prior to screening)
- Have not used any ULT since at least two weeks prior to screening
- Have not used colchicine since at least two weeks prior to screening
- Usual level of resting pain when NOT experiencing flare is three or less on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS)
- Have a sUA ≥ 7.5 mg/dL and ≤ 12 mg/dL at screening
- All female patients must be surgically sterile or post-menopausal (at least 45 years of age with no history of menses for at least two years); or have a partner who has undergone vasectomy or must agree to use two medically accepted methods of contraception including a barrier method (see Appendix 4) for the entire duration of study participation unless she reports complete sexual abstinence. Female patients must not be pregnant or lactating
- Estimated creatinine clearance (eCrCl) ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73m2 calculated by Cockcroft-Gault method at screening
- Liver function tests ≤ 3X ULN for AST, ALT and total bilirubin; ≤ 3X ULN for ALP and GGT; and ≤ 3X ULN for CK at screening
- All other clinical laboratory parameters must be within normal limits or considered not clinically significant
- Electrocardiogram (ECG) must be normal, or if abnormal, considered not clinically significant at screening
- Systolic blood pressure ≤ 160 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mm Hg at screening; known hypertensive patients stable (blood pressure \[BP\] reading as above) with medication may be included
- Patients using agents known to influence sUA levels (see Appendix 7) must be on a stable dose and regimen for at least two weeks prior to screening and must be willing to continue the same doses and regimens during study participation
- Expected to be able to tolerate a short course of either oral NSAIDs and/or oral steroids as may be needed to treat a flare
- +2 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Receiving treatment with allopurinol, colchicine, probenecid, benzbromarone, or febuxostat within two weeks or pegloticase within six months prior to screening
- Known or suspected secondary hyperuricemia (e.g. due to myeloproliferative disorder or organ transplant)
- Diagnosis of xanthinuria
- Fractional excretion of urate \> 10% at screening
- History of documented or suspected kidney stones
- Known infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or history of viral hepatitis type B or C
- A diagnosis of illicit drug or alcohol dependence or abuse within one year of screening
- History of upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, documented peptic ulcer disease (unless known H. pylori infection treated successfully without recurrence), within three years of screening
- History of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), acute myocardial infarction (MI), congestive heart failure (NYHA Class II-IV), angina pectoris, coronary intervention procedure (including but not limited to angioplasty, stent placement, coronary revascularization), lower extremity bypass procedure, systemic or intracoronary fibrinolytic therapy within five years of screening
- History of cancer within five years of screening, with the following exceptions: adequately treated non-melanomatous skin cancers, non-metastatic prostate cancer or in situ cervical cancer
- Patients with a history of bladder cancer, active bladder cancer or hematuria
- Body mass index (BMI) \> 42 kg/m2 at screening
- Current or expected requirement for anticoagulant therapy (except for aspirin ≤ 325 mg/day, clopidogrel \[Plavix\] ≤ 75 mg/day, or prasugrel \[Effient\] ≤ 10 mg/day)
- Use of any of the following within eight weeks prior to screening: potent CYP3A4 inhibitors, cytotoxic agents (including azathioprine, mercaptopurine, cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, etc.), ranolazine, digoxin, theophylline, sulphonylureas, thiazolidinediones (e.g., rosiglitazone or pioglitazone), atypical antipsychotic agents, ampicillin, amoxicillin, loop diuretics or phenytoin
- Chronic treatment with NSAIDs (except for as needed \[prn\] use to treat acute events); per protocol a short course of oral NSAIDs may be used to treat flares during the study
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Gilead Scienceslead
Study Sites (56)
Unknown Facility
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Unknown Facility
El Cajon, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Long Beach, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Denver, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Unknown Facility
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
DeLand, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Jupiter, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
New Port Richey, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Palm Harbor, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
Unknown Facility
Boise, Idaho, United States
Unknown Facility
Brownsburg, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Bowling Green, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Elizabethtown, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Owensboro, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Hagerstown, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Olive Branch, Mississippi, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Missoula, Montana, United States
Unknown Facility
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Unknown Facility
Brooklyn, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Hickory, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Salisbury, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Portland, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
Johnstown, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Greer, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Summerville, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Bristol, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Jackson, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
West Jordan, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Spokane, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Clarksburg, West Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Sarnia, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Tbilisi, Georgia
Related Publications (1)
Poiley J, Steinberg AS, Choi YJ, Davis CS, Martin RL, McWherter CA, Boudes PF; Arhalofenate Flare Study Investigators. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active- and Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study of Arhalofenate for Reducing Flare in Patients With Gout. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Aug;68(8):2027-34. doi: 10.1002/art.39684.
PMID: 26989892DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 12, 2014
First Posted
February 17, 2014
Study Start
March 1, 2014
Primary Completion
January 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 29, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01