Study Stopped
Expectation that within the set time period insufficient patients will be included, so endpoints will not be achieved
Spatial Analysis and Validation of Glioblastoma on 7 T MRI
2 other identifiers
interventional
5
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Currently, patients with a glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) are treated with a combination of different therapeutic modalities including resection, concurrent chemo- and radiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide. However, survival is still poor and most of these tumours recur within one to two years within the previously irradiated target volume. The radiation target volume encompasses both the contrast-enhanced lesion on T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), plus a 1.5 - 2 cm isotropic margin in order to include microscopic speculated growth. These margins result in a high dose to surrounding healthy appearing brain tissue. Moreover, the short progression-free survival indicates a possible geographical miss. There is a clear need for novel imaging techniques in order to better determine the degree of tumour extent at the time of treatment and to minimize the dose to healthy brain tissue. The development of Ultra-High Field (UHF) MRI at a magnetic field strength of 7 Tesla (T) provides an increased ability to detect, quantify and monitor tumour activity and determine post-treatment effects on the normal brain tissue as a result of a higher resolution, greater coverage and shorter scan times compared to 1.5 T and 3 T images. Up to now, only few investigators have examined the use of UHF MRI in patients with malignant brain tumours. These studies show its potential to assess tumour microvasculature and post-radiation effects such as microhaemorrhages. This study analyzes the accuracy of the 7T MRI in identifying the gross tumour volume (GTV) in patients with an untreated GBM by comparing biopsy results to 7T images. These biopsies will be taken from suspected regions of GBM based on 7T MRI that do not appear as such on 3T MRI. We hypothesize that with the 7T MRI the GTV can be more accurately and extensively identified when compared to the 3T MRI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 12, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 10, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 5, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 5, 2018
CompletedAugust 17, 2018
August 1, 2018
3.2 years
February 12, 2014
August 16, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The co-localisation of the Gross Tumour Volume (GTV) on 7T MRI and 3T MRI
The spatial overlap in GTV between 7T MRI and 3T MRI as well as inter- and intra-observer variability will be measured with the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and the mean of the slice-wise Hausdorff distances.
Six months after biopsy
Secondary Outcomes (7)
The correspondence between glioblastoma cells found in the biopsies and region of interest (ROI) on the 7T MRI scan.
Within a month after biopsy
The co-localisation of the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) on 7T MRI and 3T MRI
Six months after the biopsy
The co-localisation of the organs at risk (OAR) on 7T - and 3T MRI
Six months after biopsy
The correlation between the first tumour recurrence on 3T MRI follow-up images and ROI on the 7T MRI scan
approx. one month after tumour recurrence
The quantification of tumour heterogeneity on 7T MRI and 3T MRI
Six months after biopsy
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Biopsy
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will receive a 7 T MRI and one additional biopsy to their standard diagnostic biopsies
Interventions
Overview Technical DetailsField strength: 7 Tesla Bore size: 60 cm System length: 317,5 cm RF power: 7,5 kW / 8x1 kW Gradient strength: SC 72 Gradients (max. 70 mT/m @ 200 T/m/s) Helium Consumption: Zero Helium boil-off technology
During surgery patients will receive standard biopsies plus one study biopsy from a region of interest. The neuro-surgeon will determine the feasibility of the extra biopsy and the optimal biopsy tract. A screen capture from the neuronavigation system will be saved for each biopsy to relate the findings on 3T and 7T MRI to histopathology.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Supratentorial tumour
- Suspected GBM on diagnostic MRI
- Eligible for biopsy
- Minimum age 18 years or older
- World Health Organization (WHO) Performance scale ≤2
- American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) class ≤ 3
- Understanding of the Dutch language
- Ability to comply to study procedure
You may not qualify if:
- Recurrent tumour
- Tumour location deemed unfit for extra biopsies
- Prior radiotherapy to the skull
- Prior chemotherapy
- World Health Organization (WHO) Performance scale ≥ 3
- American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) class ≥ 3
- Eligibility for immediate debulking
- Contra-indications for gadolinium
- Contra-indications for the MRI
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Maastricht Radiation Oncologylead
- The Limburg University Fundcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Maastricht Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO clinic)
Maastricht, Limburg, 6229ET, Netherlands
Related Publications (17)
Christoforidis GA, Yang M, Abduljalil A, Chaudhury AR, Newton HB, McGregor JM, Epstein CR, Yuh WT, Watson S, Robitaille PM. "Tumoral pseudoblush" identified within gliomas at high-spatial-resolution ultrahigh-field-strength gradient-echo MR imaging corresponds to microvascularity at stereotactic biopsy. Radiology. 2012 Jul;264(1):210-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12110799. Epub 2012 May 24.
PMID: 22627600BACKGROUNDLupo JM, Chuang CF, Chang SM, Barani IJ, Jimenez B, Hess CP, Nelson SJ. 7-Tesla susceptibility-weighted imaging to assess the effects of radiotherapy on normal-appearing brain in patients with glioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Mar 1;82(3):e493-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.046. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
PMID: 22000750BACKGROUNDGrossman R, Sadetzki S, Spiegelmann R, Ram Z. Haemorrhagic complications and the incidence of asymptomatic bleeding associated with stereotactic brain biopsies. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005 Jun;147(6):627-31; discussion 631. doi: 10.1007/s00701-005-0495-5. Epub 2005 Apr 15.
PMID: 15821863BACKGROUNDStupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJ, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Allgeier A, Fisher B, Belanger K, Hau P, Brandes AA, Gijtenbeek J, Marosi C, Vecht CJ, Mokhtari K, Wesseling P, Villa S, Eisenhauer E, Gorlia T, Weller M, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Mirimanoff RO; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumour and Radiation Oncology Groups; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009 May;10(5):459-66. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
PMID: 19269895BACKGROUNDHalperin EC, Bentel G, Heinz ER, Burger PC. Radiation therapy treatment planning in supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme: an analysis based on post mortem topographic anatomy with CT correlations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989 Dec;17(6):1347-50. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90548-8.
PMID: 2557310BACKGROUNDOppitz U, Maessen D, Zunterer H, Richter S, Flentje M. 3D-recurrence-patterns of glioblastomas after CT-planned postoperative irradiation. Radiother Oncol. 1999 Oct;53(1):53-7. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(99)00117-6.
PMID: 10624854BACKGROUNDLupo JM, Li Y, Hess CP, Nelson SJ. Advances in ultra-high field MRI for the clinical management of patients with brain tumors. Curr Opin Neurol. 2011 Dec;24(6):605-15. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32834cd495.
PMID: 22045220BACKGROUNDMoenninghoff C, Maderwald S, Theysohn JM, Kraff O, Ladd ME, El Hindy N, van de Nes J, Forsting M, Wanke I. Imaging of adult astrocytic brain tumours with 7 T MRI: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 2010 Mar;20(3):704-13. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1592-2. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
PMID: 19763581BACKGROUNDTheysohn JM, Maderwald S, Kraff O, Moenninghoff C, Ladd ME, Ladd SC. Subjective acceptance of 7 Tesla MRI for human imaging. MAGMA. 2008 Mar;21(1-2):63-72. doi: 10.1007/s10334-007-0095-x. Epub 2007 Dec 7.
PMID: 18064501BACKGROUNDChakeres DW, Kangarlu A, Boudoulas H, Young DC. Effect of static magnetic field exposure of up to 8 Tesla on sequential human vital sign measurements. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Sep;18(3):346-52. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10367.
PMID: 12938131BACKGROUNDDuchin Y, Abosch A, Yacoub E, Sapiro G, Harel N. Feasibility of using ultra-high field (7 T) MRI for clinical surgical targeting. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037328. Epub 2012 May 17.
PMID: 22615980BACKGROUNDDammann P, Kraff O, Wrede KH, Ozkan N, Orzada S, Mueller OM, Sandalcioglu IE, Sure U, Gizewski ER, Ladd ME, Gasser T. Evaluation of hardware-related geometrical distortion in structural MRI at 7 Tesla for image-guided applications in neurosurgery. Acad Radiol. 2011 Jul;18(7):910-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.02.011. Epub 2011 May 5.
PMID: 21549620BACKGROUNDLouis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, Scheithauer BW, Kleihues P. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2007 Aug;114(2):97-109. doi: 10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4. Epub 2007 Jul 6.
PMID: 17618441BACKGROUNDKubben PL, Wesseling P, Lammens M, Schijns OE, Ter Laak-Poort MP, van Overbeeke JJ, van Santbrink H. Correlation between contrast enhancement on intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology in glioblastoma. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:158. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.105097. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
PMID: 23372974BACKGROUNDUmutlu L, Theysohn N, Maderwald S, Johst S, Lauenstein TC, Moenninghoff C, Goericke SL, Dammann P, Wrede KH, Ladd ME, Forsting M, Schlamann M. 7 Tesla MPRAGE imaging of the intracranial arterial vasculature: nonenhanced versus contrast-enhanced. Acad Radiol. 2013 May;20(5):628-34. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.12.012. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
PMID: 23473725BACKGROUNDDice LR. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology. 1945;26: 297 - 302.
BACKGROUNDKumar V, Gu Y, Basu S, Berglund A, Eschrich SA, Schabath MB, Forster K, Aerts HJ, Dekker A, Fenstermacher D, Goldgof DB, Hall LO, Lambin P, Balagurunathan Y, Gatenby RA, Gillies RJ. Radiomics: the process and the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;30(9):1234-48. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.010. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
PMID: 22898692BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Philippe Lambin, prof
Maastricht Radiation Oncology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 12, 2014
First Posted
February 13, 2014
Study Start
December 10, 2014
Primary Completion
February 5, 2018
Study Completion
February 5, 2018
Last Updated
August 17, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08