NCT02062372

Brief Summary

Currently, patients with a glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) are treated with a combination of different therapeutic modalities including resection, concurrent chemo- and radiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide. However, survival is still poor and most of these tumours recur within one to two years within the previously irradiated target volume. The radiation target volume encompasses both the contrast-enhanced lesion on T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), plus a 1.5 - 2 cm isotropic margin in order to include microscopic speculated growth. These margins result in a high dose to surrounding healthy appearing brain tissue. Moreover, the short progression-free survival indicates a possible geographical miss. There is a clear need for novel imaging techniques in order to better determine the degree of tumour extent at the time of treatment and to minimize the dose to healthy brain tissue. The development of Ultra-High Field (UHF) MRI at a magnetic field strength of 7 Tesla (T) provides an increased ability to detect, quantify and monitor tumour activity and determine post-treatment effects on the normal brain tissue as a result of a higher resolution, greater coverage and shorter scan times compared to 1.5 T and 3 T images. Up to now, only few investigators have examined the use of UHF MRI in patients with malignant brain tumours. These studies show its potential to assess tumour microvasculature and post-radiation effects such as microhaemorrhages. This study analyzes the accuracy of the 7T MRI in identifying the gross tumour volume (GTV) in patients with an untreated GBM by comparing biopsy results to 7T images. These biopsies will be taken from suspected regions of GBM based on 7T MRI that do not appear as such on 3T MRI. We hypothesize that with the 7T MRI the GTV can be more accurately and extensively identified when compared to the 3T MRI.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
5

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2014

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 12, 2014

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 13, 2014

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 10, 2014

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 5, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 5, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

August 17, 2018

Status Verified

August 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

February 12, 2014

Last Update Submit

August 16, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

7 T MRIRadiotherapyGlioblastomaBiopsy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The co-localisation of the Gross Tumour Volume (GTV) on 7T MRI and 3T MRI

    The spatial overlap in GTV between 7T MRI and 3T MRI as well as inter- and intra-observer variability will be measured with the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and the mean of the slice-wise Hausdorff distances.

    Six months after biopsy

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • The correspondence between glioblastoma cells found in the biopsies and region of interest (ROI) on the 7T MRI scan.

    Within a month after biopsy

  • The co-localisation of the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) on 7T MRI and 3T MRI

    Six months after the biopsy

  • The co-localisation of the organs at risk (OAR) on 7T - and 3T MRI

    Six months after biopsy

  • The correlation between the first tumour recurrence on 3T MRI follow-up images and ROI on the 7T MRI scan

    approx. one month after tumour recurrence

  • The quantification of tumour heterogeneity on 7T MRI and 3T MRI

    Six months after biopsy

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Biopsy

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects will receive a 7 T MRI and one additional biopsy to their standard diagnostic biopsies

Device: 7 T MRIProcedure: Biopsy

Interventions

7 T MRIDEVICE

Overview Technical DetailsField strength: 7 Tesla Bore size: 60 cm System length: 317,5 cm RF power: 7,5 kW / 8x1 kW Gradient strength: SC 72 Gradients (max. 70 mT/m @ 200 T/m/s) Helium Consumption: Zero Helium boil-off technology

Also known as: Siemens MAGNETOM 7
Biopsy
BiopsyPROCEDURE

During surgery patients will receive standard biopsies plus one study biopsy from a region of interest. The neuro-surgeon will determine the feasibility of the extra biopsy and the optimal biopsy tract. A screen capture from the neuronavigation system will be saved for each biopsy to relate the findings on 3T and 7T MRI to histopathology.

Also known as: Brain biopsy, Tumor sampling
Biopsy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Supratentorial tumour
  • Suspected GBM on diagnostic MRI
  • Eligible for biopsy
  • Minimum age 18 years or older
  • World Health Organization (WHO) Performance scale ≤2
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) class ≤ 3
  • Understanding of the Dutch language
  • Ability to comply to study procedure

You may not qualify if:

  • Recurrent tumour
  • Tumour location deemed unfit for extra biopsies
  • Prior radiotherapy to the skull
  • Prior chemotherapy
  • World Health Organization (WHO) Performance scale ≥ 3
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) class ≥ 3
  • Eligibility for immediate debulking
  • Contra-indications for gadolinium
  • Contra-indications for the MRI

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Maastricht Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO clinic)

Maastricht, Limburg, 6229ET, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (17)

  • Christoforidis GA, Yang M, Abduljalil A, Chaudhury AR, Newton HB, McGregor JM, Epstein CR, Yuh WT, Watson S, Robitaille PM. "Tumoral pseudoblush" identified within gliomas at high-spatial-resolution ultrahigh-field-strength gradient-echo MR imaging corresponds to microvascularity at stereotactic biopsy. Radiology. 2012 Jul;264(1):210-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12110799. Epub 2012 May 24.

    PMID: 22627600BACKGROUND
  • Lupo JM, Chuang CF, Chang SM, Barani IJ, Jimenez B, Hess CP, Nelson SJ. 7-Tesla susceptibility-weighted imaging to assess the effects of radiotherapy on normal-appearing brain in patients with glioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Mar 1;82(3):e493-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.046. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

    PMID: 22000750BACKGROUND
  • Grossman R, Sadetzki S, Spiegelmann R, Ram Z. Haemorrhagic complications and the incidence of asymptomatic bleeding associated with stereotactic brain biopsies. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005 Jun;147(6):627-31; discussion 631. doi: 10.1007/s00701-005-0495-5. Epub 2005 Apr 15.

    PMID: 15821863BACKGROUND
  • Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJ, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Allgeier A, Fisher B, Belanger K, Hau P, Brandes AA, Gijtenbeek J, Marosi C, Vecht CJ, Mokhtari K, Wesseling P, Villa S, Eisenhauer E, Gorlia T, Weller M, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Mirimanoff RO; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumour and Radiation Oncology Groups; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009 May;10(5):459-66. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7. Epub 2009 Mar 9.

    PMID: 19269895BACKGROUND
  • Halperin EC, Bentel G, Heinz ER, Burger PC. Radiation therapy treatment planning in supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme: an analysis based on post mortem topographic anatomy with CT correlations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989 Dec;17(6):1347-50. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90548-8.

    PMID: 2557310BACKGROUND
  • Oppitz U, Maessen D, Zunterer H, Richter S, Flentje M. 3D-recurrence-patterns of glioblastomas after CT-planned postoperative irradiation. Radiother Oncol. 1999 Oct;53(1):53-7. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(99)00117-6.

    PMID: 10624854BACKGROUND
  • Lupo JM, Li Y, Hess CP, Nelson SJ. Advances in ultra-high field MRI for the clinical management of patients with brain tumors. Curr Opin Neurol. 2011 Dec;24(6):605-15. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32834cd495.

    PMID: 22045220BACKGROUND
  • Moenninghoff C, Maderwald S, Theysohn JM, Kraff O, Ladd ME, El Hindy N, van de Nes J, Forsting M, Wanke I. Imaging of adult astrocytic brain tumours with 7 T MRI: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 2010 Mar;20(3):704-13. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1592-2. Epub 2009 Sep 18.

    PMID: 19763581BACKGROUND
  • Theysohn JM, Maderwald S, Kraff O, Moenninghoff C, Ladd ME, Ladd SC. Subjective acceptance of 7 Tesla MRI for human imaging. MAGMA. 2008 Mar;21(1-2):63-72. doi: 10.1007/s10334-007-0095-x. Epub 2007 Dec 7.

    PMID: 18064501BACKGROUND
  • Chakeres DW, Kangarlu A, Boudoulas H, Young DC. Effect of static magnetic field exposure of up to 8 Tesla on sequential human vital sign measurements. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Sep;18(3):346-52. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10367.

    PMID: 12938131BACKGROUND
  • Duchin Y, Abosch A, Yacoub E, Sapiro G, Harel N. Feasibility of using ultra-high field (7 T) MRI for clinical surgical targeting. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037328. Epub 2012 May 17.

    PMID: 22615980BACKGROUND
  • Dammann P, Kraff O, Wrede KH, Ozkan N, Orzada S, Mueller OM, Sandalcioglu IE, Sure U, Gizewski ER, Ladd ME, Gasser T. Evaluation of hardware-related geometrical distortion in structural MRI at 7 Tesla for image-guided applications in neurosurgery. Acad Radiol. 2011 Jul;18(7):910-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.02.011. Epub 2011 May 5.

    PMID: 21549620BACKGROUND
  • Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, Scheithauer BW, Kleihues P. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2007 Aug;114(2):97-109. doi: 10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4. Epub 2007 Jul 6.

    PMID: 17618441BACKGROUND
  • Kubben PL, Wesseling P, Lammens M, Schijns OE, Ter Laak-Poort MP, van Overbeeke JJ, van Santbrink H. Correlation between contrast enhancement on intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology in glioblastoma. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:158. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.105097. Epub 2012 Dec 26.

    PMID: 23372974BACKGROUND
  • Umutlu L, Theysohn N, Maderwald S, Johst S, Lauenstein TC, Moenninghoff C, Goericke SL, Dammann P, Wrede KH, Ladd ME, Forsting M, Schlamann M. 7 Tesla MPRAGE imaging of the intracranial arterial vasculature: nonenhanced versus contrast-enhanced. Acad Radiol. 2013 May;20(5):628-34. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.12.012. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

    PMID: 23473725BACKGROUND
  • Dice LR. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology. 1945;26: 297 - 302.

    BACKGROUND
  • Kumar V, Gu Y, Basu S, Berglund A, Eschrich SA, Schabath MB, Forster K, Aerts HJ, Dekker A, Fenstermacher D, Goldgof DB, Hall LO, Lambin P, Balagurunathan Y, Gatenby RA, Gillies RJ. Radiomics: the process and the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;30(9):1234-48. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.010. Epub 2012 Aug 13.

    PMID: 22898692BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Glioblastoma

Interventions

Biopsy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AstrocytomaGliomaNeoplasms, NeuroepithelialNeuroectodermal TumorsNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms, Nerve Tissue

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CytodiagnosisCytological TechniquesClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisSpecimen HandlingDiagnostic Techniques, SurgicalSurgical Procedures, OperativeInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Philippe Lambin, prof

    Maastricht Radiation Oncology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2014

First Posted

February 13, 2014

Study Start

December 10, 2014

Primary Completion

February 5, 2018

Study Completion

February 5, 2018

Last Updated

August 17, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-08

Locations