Electronic Method for Recording Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Validation of Electronic Recording of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) in Men
1 other identifier
observational
29
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Urinary diaries have proven to be beneficial in assessing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), however they have not achieved widespread acceptance. The likely reason is the fact that the pen and paper diaries are labor intensive for both patient (need to carry a pen and paper and record each event) and doctor (need to transfer, summarize and analyze the data). Hypothesis: Electronic voiding diary, would automate the recording and analysis of data, expedite the process, improve its accuracy and cost effectiveness. Electronic recording of lower urinary tract symptoms (SUF) uses wireless phone and web based technologies to record LUTS remotely and store the data on a secure website which can be accessed by the doctor or patient whenever needed. The goal of this study was to compare its validity and reliability to the traditional micturition chart (MC) recording method - the current gold standard where the patient records the time of micturition and degree of urgency using a pen and paper.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jun 2013
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2014
CompletedFebruary 11, 2014
February 1, 2014
7 months
January 27, 2014
February 10, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of the level of accuracy and adherence to the study protocol
Asses a difference between average number of micturition events, frequency, and degree of urgency episodes recorded using SUF and MC, to determine is SUF provides equally relevant information to that obtained by the standard approach. User compliance will be assessed though recording the number of patients who forgot to record micturitions and urgency episodes using SUF versus MC.
January - February 2014 (1 month)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
User preference
January - February (1 month)
Study Arms (1)
Study group
Men presenting to the urology clinic with lower urinary tract symptoms
Eligibility Criteria
Men presenting to the urology clinic with lower urinary tract symptoms
You may qualify if:
- Men seeking treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms
You may not qualify if:
- none
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Urology
Ostrava, Nothern Moravia, 708 52, Czechia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jan Krhut, MD, PhD
Ostrava University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CROSSOVER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief research officer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2014
First Posted
February 11, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
January 1, 2014
Study Completion
January 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 11, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-02