NCT02054013

Brief Summary

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent entity, affecting over 50% of men older than 60 years. The clinical picture of the disease includes lower urinary tract symptoms such as interrupted and weak urinary stream, nocturia, urgency and leaking and even sexual dysfunction in some individuals. Medical therapy is usually the first-line treatment. However, the efficacy of drugs like alpha-blockers is limited, and as disease progresses more invasive treatment options have to be taken into consideration. In cases with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) is the standard treatment. TURP, however, is limited to prostates smaller than 60-80ml and the procedure is associated with a complication rate. The cumulative short-term morbidity rate is around 11% and the necessity for surgical revision is as high as 6%. Bleeding requiring transfusions and transurethral resection syndrome represent potentially serious threats to elderly and frail patients. Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) has been suggested as a minimal invasive alternative procedure, which can be performed in an outpatient setting with rapid recovery and low morbidity. The investigators hypothesize that PAE is non-inferior in the treatment of symptomatic BPH compared to conventional and established TUR-P.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
101

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2014

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 31, 2014

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 4, 2014

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 11, 2014

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 19, 2017

Completed
4.8 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 16, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

December 7, 2022

Status Verified

December 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3.6 years

First QC Date

January 31, 2014

Last Update Submit

December 5, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in the International Prostate Symptom Score

    Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Changes of prostate volume using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Baseline, 12 weeks and 24 months after intervention

  • Changes in bladder diary

    Baseline and at all follow up controls

  • Pre- and postoperative changes in C-reactive Protein, Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), serum amyloid A, Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-10

    Baseline and 1 day, 2 days, 1 and 6 weeks post intervention

  • Changes in urodynamic parameters

    Baseline and 12 and 24 months after intervention

  • Duration of hospitalization post procedure

    hospital discharge

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Prostatic artery embolization

EXPERIMENTAL

Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) has been suggested as a minimal invasive alternative procedure with rapid recovery and low morbidity

Procedure: Prostatic artery embolization

Conventional monopolar transurethral prostatectomy

OTHER

Standard treatment

Procedure: monopolar transurethral prostatectomy

Interventions

Prostatic artery embolization
Conventional monopolar transurethral prostatectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Men older than 40
  • Patient must be a candidate for TURP
  • Refractory to medical therapy or patient is not willing to consider (further) medical treatment
  • Patient has a prostate size of at least 25 ml and not more than 80 ml, measured by ultrasound
  • IPSS ≥8
  • QoL ≥3
  • Qmax\<12 and/or urinary retention
  • Written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Mild symptoms (IPSS \<8)
  • Severe atherosclerosis
  • Severe tortuosity in the aortic bifurcation or internal iliac arteries
  • Acontractile detrusor
  • Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction
  • Urethral stenosis
  • Bladder diverticulum
  • Bladder stone with surgical indication
  • Allergy to intravenous contrast media
  • Contraindication for MRI imaging
  • Preinterventionally proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate
  • Renal failure (GFR\<60ml/min)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen

Sankt Gallen, 9007, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Abt D, Mordasini L, Hechelhammer L, Kessler TM, Schmid HP, Engeler DS. Prostatic artery embolization versus conventional TUR-P in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: protocol for a prospective randomized non-inferiority trial. BMC Urol. 2014 Nov 25;14:94. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-94.

    PMID: 25425136BACKGROUND
  • Abt D, Hechelhammer L, Mullhaupt G, Markart S, Gusewell S, Kessler TM, Schmid HP, Engeler DS, Mordasini L. Comparison of prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomised, open label, non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2018 Jun 19;361:k2338. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2338.

    PMID: 29921613BACKGROUND
  • Mullhaupt G, Hechelhammer L, Diener PA, Engeler DS, Gusewell S, Schmid HP, Mordasini L, Abt D. Ejaculatory disorders after prostatic artery embolization: a reassessment of two prospective clinical trials. World J Urol. 2020 Oct;38(10):2595-2599. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03036-7. Epub 2019 Dec 7.

    PMID: 31813028BACKGROUND
  • Mullhaupt G, Hechelhammer L, Engeler DS, Gusewell S, Betschart P, Zumstein V, Kessler TM, Schmid HP, Mordasini L, Abt D. In-hospital cost analysis of prostatic artery embolization compared with transurethral resection of the prostate: post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int. 2019 Jun;123(6):1055-1060. doi: 10.1111/bju.14660. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

    PMID: 30578705BACKGROUND
  • Abt D, Mullhaupt G, Hechelhammer L, Markart S, Gusewell S, Schmid HP, Mordasini L, Engeler DS. Prostatic Artery Embolisation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: 2-yr Outcomes of a Randomised, Open-label, Single-centre Trial. Eur Urol. 2021 Jul;80(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

    PMID: 33612376BACKGROUND
  • Mullhaupt G, Hechelhammer L, Graf N, Mordasini L, Schmid HP, Engeler DS, Abt D. Prostatic Artery Embolisation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: 5-year Outcomes of a Randomised, Open-label, Noninferiority Trial. Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Sep;10(5):788-795. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.03.001. Epub 2024 Mar 25.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Hyperplasia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Prostatic DiseasesGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Daniel Engeler, MD

    Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr. med.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2014

First Posted

February 4, 2014

Study Start

February 11, 2014

Primary Completion

September 19, 2017

Study Completion

July 16, 2022

Last Updated

December 7, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-12

Locations