NCT01533038

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the UroLift System Treatment to Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) in improving a patient's overall quality of life, while evaluating healthcare expenditures associated with each therapy.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2012

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
3 countries

9 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2012

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 10, 2012

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 15, 2012

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 26, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

December 19, 2017

Status Verified

November 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3.7 years

First QC Date

February 10, 2012

Results QC Date

October 22, 2015

Last Update Submit

November 20, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Responder Analysis: A Subject is a Responder at the 12 Month Follow-up Time Point if All 6 Thresholds of the BPH-6 Endpoint Are Met

    1. LUTS: ≥ 30% reduction in IPSS compared to baseline 2. Recovery Experience: Return to pre-operative activity levels by 1 month 3. Erectile function: Less than 6-point reduction in SHIM compared to baseline. 4. Ejaculatory function: Response on MSHQ-EjD that indicates emission of semen. This excludes the response "Could not ejaculate" 5. Continence: ISI score of 4 points or less at all follow-up time points 6. Safety: No procedure-related adverse event greater than Grade I on the Clavien-Dindo classification system modified for TURP at any time during procedure or follow up.

    Month 12

Study Arms (2)

UroLift System

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

UroLift System procedure

Device: UroLift System

Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Transurethral Resection of the Prostate surgery

Procedure: Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

Interventions

The NeoTract UroLift System is a medical device approved for sale in the European Union, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Serbia, and Turkey. It was developed for the intended use of soft tissue approximation and for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). During the procedure, an implant is delivered into the prostatic lobe obstructing the urethra and restricting urine flow. The distal end of the device is used to compress the lobe then the implant is delivered to retain the lobe in position, thereby increasing the urethral opening and reducing the fluid obstruction through the prostatic urethra.

UroLift System

Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) is a surgical procedure which removes prostatic tissue by electrocautery dissection. During the procedure the tissue at the bladder neck and the adjacent adenoma are resected in quadrants. Resection continues into the midportion of the gland and concludes at the apex. Any remaining residual tissue is cleared, leaving a void from verumontanum to bladder neck.

Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Men \>50 years old with moderate-severe BPH

You may not qualify if:

  • Size, width of prostate
  • Other medical condition or co-morbidity contraindicative for TURP or UroLift

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (9)

Herlev Hospital

Herlev, Denmark

Location

PAN Klinik

Cologne, 50667, Germany

Location

University Hospital Freiburg

Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106, Germany

Location

Ludwigs-Maximilians Universität / Klinikum Großhadern

Munich, 81377, Germany

Location

University Hospital Tuebingen

Tübingen, Germany

Location

Frimley Park Hospital

Frimley, GU16 7UJ, United Kingdom

Location

The Royal Hallamshire Hospital

Sheffield, United Kingdom

Location

City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust

Sunderland, United Kingdom

Location

Musgrove Park Hospital

Taunton, TA1 5DA, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Sonksen J, Barber NJ, Speakman MJ, Berges R, Wetterauer U, Greene D, Sievert KD, Chapple CR, Montorsi F, Patterson JM, Fahrenkrug L, Schoenthaler M, Gratzke C. Prospective, randomized, multinational study of prostatic urethral lift versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 12-month results from the BPH6 study. Eur Urol. 2015 Oct;68(4):643-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.024. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Hyperplasia

Interventions

Transurethral Resection of Prostate

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Prostatic DiseasesGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ProstatectomyUrologic Surgical Procedures, MaleUrologic Surgical ProceduresUrogenital Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, Operative

Results Point of Contact

Title
Director of Clinical Affairs
Organization
NeoTract

Study Officials

  • Francesco Montorsi, MD

    University Vita Salute San Raffaele

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2012

First Posted

February 15, 2012

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion

October 1, 2015

Study Completion

January 1, 2016

Last Updated

December 19, 2017

Results First Posted

November 26, 2015

Record last verified: 2017-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations