Assessing the Impact of an Intervention to Prevent Intimate Partner Violence and HIV in Uganda
SHARE
A Cluster Randomized Trial of the Impact of an Intimate Partner Violence and HIV Prevention Intervention on Emotional, Physical and Sexual Abuse, Sexual Risk Behaviors and HIV Incidence in Rakai, Uganda
2 other identifiers
interventional
11,451
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a precursor to and consequence of HIV infection. Few interventions combining HIV and IPV prevention have been evaluated and none has significantly decreased both outcomes. A cluster-randomized trial was conducted in Rakai, Uganda. Four intervention arm clusters (N=5,339) received an IPV prevention intervention (the Safe Homes and Respect for Everyone (SHARE) Project), enhanced HIV testing and treatment and routine HIV services provided by Rakai Health Sciences Program (RHSP). Seven control arm clusters (N=6,112) received standard of care HIV services alone. Baseline and two follow-up visits were conducted via the Rakai Community Cohort Study between 2005 and 2009. Primary outcomes were past year emotional, physical and sexual IPV and HIV incidence. Secondary outcomes included past year intimate partner rape/forced sex, number of total and extra-marital sex partners, alcohol use surrounding sex, condom use, discussion about condom use, partner's disclosure of HIV status and respondent's disclosure of HIV status. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate prevalence risk ratios (PRR) to detect the impact of the intervention on IPV and secondary outcomes. Poisson regression was used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRR) of HIV acquisition per 100 person years (py). Our study had three research aims and related hypotheses. Aim 1 was to assess the impact of SHARE + RHSP community services on report of victimization from and perpetration of physical and/or sexual IPV in the past 12 months, compared to the impact of RHSP community services alone. Hypothesis 1(a): SHARE intervention will reduce women's reports of IPV victimization in intervention vs. control arms. Hypothesis 1(b): SHARE intervention will reduce men's reports of IPV perpetration in intervention vs. control arms. Aim 2 was to assess the impact of SHARE + RHSP services on report of sexual risk behaviors among men and women compared to the impact of RHSP community services alone. Hypothesis 2(a): SHARE intervention will reduce selected sexual risk behaviors in the intervention vs. control arms. Aim 3 was to assess the impact of SHARE + RHSP services on HIV incidence compared to the impact of RHSP community services alone. Hypothesis 3(a): Incidence of HIV will be lower in the intervention vs. control arms.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable hiv
Started Feb 2005
Longer than P75 for not_applicable hiv
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 28, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2014
CompletedOctober 15, 2014
January 1, 2014
4.8 years
January 28, 2014
October 12, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intimate partner violence
Physical violence was measured by asking female participants, "In the past 12 months has your current partner done any of the following to you: Pushed, pulled, slapped, or held you down? Punched you with fist or with something that could hurt you? Kicked you or dragged you? Tried to strangle you or burn you? Threatened you with a knife, gun or other type of weapon? Attacked you with knife, gun, or other weapon?" (Yes/No) Sexual IPV was measured by asking female participants, "In the past 12 months has your current partner done any of the following to you: Used verbal threats to force you to have sex when you did not want to? Physically forced you to have sex when you did not want to? Forced you to perform other sexual acts when you did not want to?" (Yes/No) Emotional intimate partner violence was measured by asking female participants, "In the past 12 months, has your current partner verbally abused or shouted at you?" (Yes/No).
One year
Secondary Outcomes (10)
HIV incidence
One year
Non-marital partnerships
One year
Condom use
One year
Alcohol use
One year
Circumcision status
One year
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention arm
EXPERIMENTALIntervention arm clusters (n=4) received an IPV prevention intervention (the Safe Homes and Respect for Everyone (SHARE) Project), enhanced HIV testing and treatment and routine HIV services.
Control arm
NO INTERVENTIONControl arm clusters (n=7) received standard of care HIV services alone.
Interventions
SHARE aimed to reduce IPV and used methodologies from two proven successful violence prevention frameworks: Stepping Stones (Welbourn, 1995) and the Resource Guide for Mobilizing Communities to Prevent Domestic Violence (Michau \& Naker, 2003). SHARE promoted a process of social change based on the Transtheoretical Model's Stages of Change Theory (Prochaska \& DiClemente, 1983; Prochaska \& Velicer, 1997) which posits that although people realize they need to make changes in their life, they do it in stages instead of one major life change. There are five main stages of change: (1) pre-contemplation, (2) contemplation, (3) preparation for action, (4) action and (5) maintenance. We hypothesized that repeated exposure to the ideas included in SHARE would encourage men and women to begin a process of change that results in preventive behavior.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Between the ages of 15-49 years;
- Consent to participation;
- Resident of at least 6 months in study community;
- Enrollment into RCCS at baseline (2005-06);
- Report of sexual activity or being in a partnership in the year prior to the baseline interview;
- Provision of follow-up information on variables of interest.
- For HIV incidence, only participants with initial HIV-negative serostatus at their baseline visit were included in the analyses.
You may not qualify if:
- Younger than 15 years and older than 49 years;
- Did not consent to participation;
- Non-resident in study community;
- Not enrolled in RCCS between 2005-06;
- Not yet sexually active or not sexually active during year prior to baseline;
- Incomplete follow up information on variables of interest;
- HIV positive at baseline
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rakai Health Sciences Program
Kalisizo, Rakai, Uganda
Related Publications (4)
Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997 Sep-Oct;12(1):38-48. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38.
PMID: 10170434BACKGROUNDProchaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Jun;51(3):390-5. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.51.3.390. No abstract available.
PMID: 6863699BACKGROUNDWagman JA, Namatovu F, Nalugoda F, Kiwanuka D, Nakigozi G, Gray R, Wawer MJ, Serwadda D. A public health approach to intimate partner violence prevention in Uganda: the SHARE Project. Violence Against Women. 2012 Dec;18(12):1390-412. doi: 10.1177/1077801212474874.
PMID: 23419276BACKGROUNDWagman JA, Gray RH, Campbell JC, Thoma M, Ndyanabo A, Ssekasanvu J, Nalugoda F, Kagaayi J, Nakigozi G, Serwadda D, Brahmbhatt H. Effectiveness of an integrated intimate partner violence and HIV prevention intervention in Rakai, Uganda: analysis of an intervention in an existing cluster randomised cohort. Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Jan;3(1):e23-33. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70344-4. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
PMID: 25539966DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jennifer Wagman, PhD
University of California, San Diego
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ronald H Gray, MD
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
- STUDY DIRECTOR
David Serwadda, MMed
Makerere University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Heena Brahmbhatt, PhD
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Fred Nalugoda, MHS
Rakai Health Sciences Program
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joseph Kagaayi, MD
Rakai Health Sciences Program
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gertrude Nakigozi, MD
Rakai Health Sciences Program
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jacquelyn Campbell, PhD
Johns Hopkins School of Nursing
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 28, 2014
First Posted
January 31, 2014
Study Start
February 1, 2005
Primary Completion
November 1, 2009
Study Completion
November 1, 2009
Last Updated
October 15, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-01