NCT02050763

Brief Summary

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a precursor to and consequence of HIV infection. Few interventions combining HIV and IPV prevention have been evaluated and none has significantly decreased both outcomes. A cluster-randomized trial was conducted in Rakai, Uganda. Four intervention arm clusters (N=5,339) received an IPV prevention intervention (the Safe Homes and Respect for Everyone (SHARE) Project), enhanced HIV testing and treatment and routine HIV services provided by Rakai Health Sciences Program (RHSP). Seven control arm clusters (N=6,112) received standard of care HIV services alone. Baseline and two follow-up visits were conducted via the Rakai Community Cohort Study between 2005 and 2009. Primary outcomes were past year emotional, physical and sexual IPV and HIV incidence. Secondary outcomes included past year intimate partner rape/forced sex, number of total and extra-marital sex partners, alcohol use surrounding sex, condom use, discussion about condom use, partner's disclosure of HIV status and respondent's disclosure of HIV status. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate prevalence risk ratios (PRR) to detect the impact of the intervention on IPV and secondary outcomes. Poisson regression was used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRR) of HIV acquisition per 100 person years (py). Our study had three research aims and related hypotheses. Aim 1 was to assess the impact of SHARE + RHSP community services on report of victimization from and perpetration of physical and/or sexual IPV in the past 12 months, compared to the impact of RHSP community services alone. Hypothesis 1(a): SHARE intervention will reduce women's reports of IPV victimization in intervention vs. control arms. Hypothesis 1(b): SHARE intervention will reduce men's reports of IPV perpetration in intervention vs. control arms. Aim 2 was to assess the impact of SHARE + RHSP services on report of sexual risk behaviors among men and women compared to the impact of RHSP community services alone. Hypothesis 2(a): SHARE intervention will reduce selected sexual risk behaviors in the intervention vs. control arms. Aim 3 was to assess the impact of SHARE + RHSP services on HIV incidence compared to the impact of RHSP community services alone. Hypothesis 3(a): Incidence of HIV will be lower in the intervention vs. control arms.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
11,451

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable hiv

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2005

Longer than P75 for not_applicable hiv

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2005

Completed
4.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2009

Completed
4.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 28, 2014

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 31, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

October 15, 2014

Status Verified

January 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

4.8 years

First QC Date

January 28, 2014

Last Update Submit

October 12, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

HIVIntimate partner violenceCommunity based prevention interventionUgandaCluster randomized trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Intimate partner violence

    Physical violence was measured by asking female participants, "In the past 12 months has your current partner done any of the following to you: Pushed, pulled, slapped, or held you down? Punched you with fist or with something that could hurt you? Kicked you or dragged you? Tried to strangle you or burn you? Threatened you with a knife, gun or other type of weapon? Attacked you with knife, gun, or other weapon?" (Yes/No) Sexual IPV was measured by asking female participants, "In the past 12 months has your current partner done any of the following to you: Used verbal threats to force you to have sex when you did not want to? Physically forced you to have sex when you did not want to? Forced you to perform other sexual acts when you did not want to?" (Yes/No) Emotional intimate partner violence was measured by asking female participants, "In the past 12 months, has your current partner verbally abused or shouted at you?" (Yes/No).

    One year

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • HIV incidence

    One year

  • Non-marital partnerships

    One year

  • Condom use

    One year

  • Alcohol use

    One year

  • Circumcision status

    One year

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Intervention arm clusters (n=4) received an IPV prevention intervention (the Safe Homes and Respect for Everyone (SHARE) Project), enhanced HIV testing and treatment and routine HIV services.

Behavioral: The SHARE Project

Control arm

NO INTERVENTION

Control arm clusters (n=7) received standard of care HIV services alone.

Interventions

SHARE aimed to reduce IPV and used methodologies from two proven successful violence prevention frameworks: Stepping Stones (Welbourn, 1995) and the Resource Guide for Mobilizing Communities to Prevent Domestic Violence (Michau \& Naker, 2003). SHARE promoted a process of social change based on the Transtheoretical Model's Stages of Change Theory (Prochaska \& DiClemente, 1983; Prochaska \& Velicer, 1997) which posits that although people realize they need to make changes in their life, they do it in stages instead of one major life change. There are five main stages of change: (1) pre-contemplation, (2) contemplation, (3) preparation for action, (4) action and (5) maintenance. We hypothesized that repeated exposure to the ideas included in SHARE would encourage men and women to begin a process of change that results in preventive behavior.

Intervention arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age15 Years - 49 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Between the ages of 15-49 years;
  • Consent to participation;
  • Resident of at least 6 months in study community;
  • Enrollment into RCCS at baseline (2005-06);
  • Report of sexual activity or being in a partnership in the year prior to the baseline interview;
  • Provision of follow-up information on variables of interest.
  • For HIV incidence, only participants with initial HIV-negative serostatus at their baseline visit were included in the analyses.

You may not qualify if:

  • Younger than 15 years and older than 49 years;
  • Did not consent to participation;
  • Non-resident in study community;
  • Not enrolled in RCCS between 2005-06;
  • Not yet sexually active or not sexually active during year prior to baseline;
  • Incomplete follow up information on variables of interest;
  • HIV positive at baseline

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Rakai Health Sciences Program

Kalisizo, Rakai, Uganda

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997 Sep-Oct;12(1):38-48. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38.

    PMID: 10170434BACKGROUND
  • Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Jun;51(3):390-5. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.51.3.390. No abstract available.

    PMID: 6863699BACKGROUND
  • Wagman JA, Namatovu F, Nalugoda F, Kiwanuka D, Nakigozi G, Gray R, Wawer MJ, Serwadda D. A public health approach to intimate partner violence prevention in Uganda: the SHARE Project. Violence Against Women. 2012 Dec;18(12):1390-412. doi: 10.1177/1077801212474874.

    PMID: 23419276BACKGROUND
  • Wagman JA, Gray RH, Campbell JC, Thoma M, Ndyanabo A, Ssekasanvu J, Nalugoda F, Kagaayi J, Nakigozi G, Serwadda D, Brahmbhatt H. Effectiveness of an integrated intimate partner violence and HIV prevention intervention in Rakai, Uganda: analysis of an intervention in an existing cluster randomised cohort. Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Jan;3(1):e23-33. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70344-4. Epub 2014 Nov 28.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Risk Reduction Behavior

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Study Officials

  • Jennifer Wagman, PhD

    University of California, San Diego

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Ronald H Gray, MD

    Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • David Serwadda, MMed

    Makerere University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Heena Brahmbhatt, PhD

    Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Fred Nalugoda, MHS

    Rakai Health Sciences Program

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Joseph Kagaayi, MD

    Rakai Health Sciences Program

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Gertrude Nakigozi, MD

    Rakai Health Sciences Program

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Jacquelyn Campbell, PhD

    Johns Hopkins School of Nursing

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2014

First Posted

January 31, 2014

Study Start

February 1, 2005

Primary Completion

November 1, 2009

Study Completion

November 1, 2009

Last Updated

October 15, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-01

Locations