Tablet-guided Versus Freehand (Tab-Guide) Ventriculostomy : Study Protocol to the Test Accuracy of Ventriculostomy in a Randomized Controlled Trial
Tab-Guide
1 other identifier
interventional
320
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Despite the widespread use of external ventricular drainage, revision rates and associated complications are reported between 10-40%. Current available image-guided techniques using stereotaxis, endoscopy or ultrasound for catheter placements remain time-consuming techniques. Recently, a phone-assisted guide with high precision has been described. The development of an easy-to-use, portable, image-guided system could reduce the need for multiple passes and improve the rate of accurate catheter placement. This study aim to compare prospectively in a randomized controlled manner the accuracy of the freehand pass technique versus an an easy-to-use, portable mini-tablet-assisted guide for ventriculostomy catheter placement. Methods/Design: This is a single center, prospective, randomized, trial with blinded endpoint (ventricle catheter tip location) assessment. Adult patients with the indication for ventriculostomy, as proven by computed tomography (CT), will be randomly assigned to the treatment group or the control group. In patients of the treatment group, ventriculostomy will be performed using a mini-tablet-guided assistance based on preoperative CT imaging. Patients in the control group will receive standard free-hand ventriculostomy using anatomical landmarks. The catheter may be placed for external drainage or internal (ventriculoperitoneal) shunting in both groups. The primary outcome measure is rate of correct placements of the ventricular catheter, defined as a score of 1 to 3 on grading system for catheter tip location on postoperative CT scan. Primary outcome will be determined by one of the authors (NS) blinded for treatment allocation. We aim to include 320 patients in 3 years. Secondary Outcome Measures include 1) Frequency of placements required, 2) Frequency of completed placements within the ventricle of the perforated part of the tip of the catheter, 3) Frequency of very early and early shunt failures (revision of the ventricular drainage within 24 hours / within three weeks, 4) Frequency and Percentage of complications (procedure-related and nonsurgical) within three weeks, 5) Length of the trajectories from the dura level to the foramen of Monroe, the angle in the coronal plane towards midline (a) and towards the target (b) at the respective entry point, 6) ventricle size (the frontal occipital horn ratio (FOHR) and the width of the lateral ventricle in the coronal plane between the medial wall of the corpus callosum and the septum), 7) Differences (angles, distance of catheter tip from target) on the tablet-guided planned and postoperative trajectory on control computer tomography within 48 hrs (CT). Discussion: Here, we present the study design of a single center prospective randomized controlled trial to investigate whether tablet-guided application ventriculostomy is superior to the standard free hand technique. The strengths of this study are: 1. the prospective, randomized interventional character testing a new easy-to handle guided versus free-hand ventricular catheter placement, and 2. the power calculation is based on catheter accuracy using an available grading system for catheter tip location and calculated with use of recent study results of our own population, supported by data from prominent studies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 4, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedJanuary 29, 2014
January 1, 2014
2.7 years
September 4, 2013
January 27, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Frequency and Percentage of correct placements of the ventricular catheter.
Table 1. Grading system for catheter tip location Grade / Accuracy of placement / Location of catheter tip 1. Optimal/adequate Ipsilateral frontal horn, including tip of third ventricle 2. Suboptimal in noneloquent tissue Controlateral frontal horn or lateral ventricle/corpus callosum/interhemispheric fissure 3. Suboptimal in eloquent tissue Brainstem/cerebellum/internal capsule/basal ganglia/thalamus/occipital cortex/basal cisterns
Assessed on postoperative cranial computer tomography, performed within 48 hours post intervention.
Frequency and Percentage of acute ventricular revisions.
2\) Frequency and Percentage of acute ventricular revisions (within 1 week for an improperly-placed catheter). Assessment is performed by a blinded investigator of the study.
7 days
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Frequency of placements required.
During intervention.
Frequency of correct placement.
on postoperative cranial computer tomography with 48 hrs post intervention.
Frequency of very early and early shunt failures
within 24 hours / within the hospital stay
Frequency and Percentage of complications
From intervention to discharge.
Length of the trajectories from the dura level to the foramen of Monroe
Evaluated on postoperative cranial computer tomography with 48 hrs post intervention.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Tablet-guided
EXPERIMENTALGuide-assisted ventriculostomy.
Freehand
EXPERIMENTALstandard ventriculostomy.
Interventions
In patients of the treatment group, ventriculostomy will be performed using a mini-tablet-guided assistance based on preoperative CT imaging. Any patient meeting the inclusion criteria and not violating the exclusion criteria may participate in the TABGUIDE study and be randomized to either a guided or freehand ventriculostomy, thus defining the two distinct groups " guided " or " freehand ").
Patients in the control group will receive standard free-hand ventriculostomy using anatomical landmarks. The catheter may be placed for external drainage or internal (ventriculoperitoneal) shunting in both groups.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age: 18 years or older,
- Indication for a ventricular drainage (such as hydrocephalus, slit ventricles, pseudotumor cerebri).
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy,
- postoperative imaging not to be performed,
- frontal burr hole not available.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Division of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva Neuroscience Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva
Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
Related Publications (1)
Sarrafzadeh A, Smoll N, Schaller K. Guided (VENTRI-GUIDE) versus freehand ventriculostomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Dec 5;15:478. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-478.
PMID: 25480528DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Neurosurgery (Charité Berlin, Germany)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 4, 2013
First Posted
January 29, 2014
Study Start
March 1, 2014
Primary Completion
November 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
January 29, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-01