NCT02045576

Brief Summary

SUMMARY Rationale: Fifty-six percent of patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) are position dependent, defined as having an AHI, which is at least twice as high in supine sleeping position compared to the AHI during sleep in other positions. Standard therapy for patients having mild or moderate POSA is treatment with an Oral Appliance Trainer (OAT). Recently a new device Sleep Position Trainer (SPT) is been introduced especially for patients with POSA. Objective: To compare the effect of positional therapy with the SPT versus OAT on polysomnographic (PSG) parameters, to evaluate the compliance and measuring the possible learning effect that might occur with POSA patients using the SPT for positional therapy over a long term. Study design: Randomised controlled trial Study population: The participants of the research will be recruited from the departments of Otolaryngology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Saint Lucas Andreas Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Participants will be males or females older than 18 years with diagnosis of positional OSA. Intervention: The SPT is a sensor positioned in an elastic band attached around the body. The SPT measures the body position and vibrates when the patient lies in supine position. Oral appliance therapy (OAT) is an intra-oral prosthesis, which holds the mandible in a protrusive position. Because of this position more pharyngeal space will be available and the AHI will decrease. After randomisation the first group (n=45) will sleep for a period of 90 +/- 2 days with the SPT every night. The second group (n=45) will also sleep for a period of 90 +/- 2 days only with OAT. After this period the PSG is repeated. Long- term outcome in AHI is measured by repeating the PSG after 1 year. Main study parameters/ endpoints: Primary endpoints; reduction of PSG parameters, in particular AHI, AI, HI, DI, reduction of % of sleeping supine sleep position, without disturbance of the sleep quality. Secondary endpoints: Outcome of Quality of Life questionnaires; EQ-5D, ESS, FOSQ and MFIQ. Compliance and learning effect will also be evaluated for the time period of 3 and 12 months. Finally cardiovascular parameters like blood pressure, pulse rate and BMI/neck circumference will be assessed. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The risks for patients participating in this study are negligible. Inconveniences of the SPT can be discomfort caused by irritation of the band, difficulties with an increased sleeping period on the side or difficulties sleeping with the SPT. This can be compensated by the expected improvement of sleep quality caused by the therapy. Possible side effects of OAT may be discomfort in the jaw, sensitivity of the teeth and a dry mouth. Withdrawing from this therapy means immediate relief of inconveniences.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
99

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2013

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2013

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 26, 2013

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 27, 2014

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

July 12, 2016

Status Verified

July 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

November 26, 2013

Last Update Submit

July 11, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Obstructive Sleep Apneasleep position traineroral appliance therapymandibular advancement device or splint

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Efficacy in reducing the mean AHI

    Apnoea Hypopnoea Index (AHI)

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • effectiveness in quality of life

    3, 6, 9 and 12 months

  • Compliance

    3, 6, 9, 12 months

  • Cardiovascular parameters

    3, 6, 9, 12 months

  • Cardiovascular parameters

    3, 6, 9 and 12 months

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Body Mass Index

    Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12 months

  • Neck circumference

    Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12 months

Study Arms (2)

Sleep position trainer

EXPERIMENTAL

Nightbalance

Device: sleep position trainer

Oral Appliance Therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Somnodent

Device: Oral Appliance Therapy

Interventions

Also known as: Nightbalance
Sleep position trainer
Also known as: Somnodent
Oral Appliance Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years and older.
  • Ability to speak, read and write Dutch.
  • Ability to follow up.
  • Ability to use a computer with internet connection and windows-software for uploading data and online questionnaires.
  • Diagnosis with symptomatic mild or moderate OSA (5 \< AHI \< 30).
  • Diagnosis of 10 to 90% supine position during the night.
  • AHI supine is \>2 times as high as AHI non-supine.
  • Expected to maintain current lifestyle (sports, medicine, diet etc.).

You may not qualify if:

  • Many dental problems; insufficient teeth for wearing OAT.
  • Medication used/ related to sleeping disorders.
  • Central Sleep Apnoea Syndrome.
  • Night or shifting work.
  • Severe chronic heart failure.
  • Medical history of known causes of tiredness by day or severe sleep disruption (insomnia, PLMS, Narcolepsy).
  • Seizure disorder.
  • Known medical history of mental retardation, memory disorders or psychiatric disorders.
  • Patients with old type of pacemakers (It is possible that old types of peacemakers are not compatible with the electromagnetic radiation of the electronics of the SPT).
  • Shoulder, neck and back complaints.
  • Reversible morphological upper airway abnormalities (e.g. enlarged tonsils).
  • Inability to provide informed consent.
  • Simultaneous use of other treatment modalities to treat OSA.
  • Previous treatment for OSA with OAT or SPT
  • Pregnancy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Academic Medical Center

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Location

St Lucas Andreas Hospital

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • de Ruiter MHT, Benoist LBL, de Vries N, de Lange J. Durability of treatment effects of the Sleep Position Trainer versus oral appliance therapy in positional OSA: 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Sleep Breath. 2018 May;22(2):441-450. doi: 10.1007/s11325-017-1568-4. Epub 2017 Sep 15.

  • Benoist L, de Ruiter M, de Lange J, de Vries N. A randomized, controlled trial of positional therapy versus oral appliance therapy for position-dependent sleep apnea. Sleep Med. 2017 Jun;34:109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2017.01.024. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Sleep Apnea SyndromesApneaRespiration DisordersRespiratory Tract DiseasesSleep Disorders, IntrinsicDyssomniasSleep Wake DisordersNervous System Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Resident/PhD student

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2013

First Posted

January 27, 2014

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion

July 1, 2016

Study Completion

July 1, 2016

Last Updated

July 12, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-07

Locations