Noninvasive Staging of Liver Fibrosis: MR vs Ultrasound
ELF
Comparison of Magnetic Resonance and Ultrasound Elastography With Liver Biopsy for Noninvasive Staging of Liver Fibrosis
1 other identifier
observational
108
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Liver fibrosis is an important public health problem, with a substantial morbidity and mortality due to progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. All causes of chronic liver disease may lead to fibrosis. The traditional diagnostic approach requires a biopsy for assessing the severity of liver disease prior to therapy. However, liver biopsy has several limitations: cost, sampling error, and procedure-related morbidity and mortality. Considering the high prevalence of viral hepatitis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, a condition often associated with obesity and type 2 diabetes, there is an urgent need for noninvasive screening, diagnosis and monitoring strategies of chronic liver disease severity. Our team has the expertise to investigate ultrasound-based and magnetic resonance-based elastographic methods for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. The primary objective of this cross-sectional study is to compare the sensitivity of elastographic methods for detecting histology-determined significant fibrosis. The secondary objectives are to compare the diagnostic accuracy of these elastographic methods and the influence of potential confounders (inflammation, steatosis and iron deposition) on their diagnostic accuracy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2014
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 20, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 24, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2018
CompletedSeptember 20, 2018
July 1, 2017
4.4 years
January 20, 2014
September 19, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Histology-determined fibrosis stage
Within 6 weeks of elastographic methods
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Fibroscan-determined liver stiffness
Within 6 weeks of liver biopsy
Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI)-determined liver stiffness
Within 6 weeks of liver biopsy
Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE)-determined liver stiffness
Within 6 weeks of liver biopsy
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-based Proton Density Fat Fraction (PDFF)
Within 6 weeks of liver biopsy
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) cine-tagging of cardiac-induced motion for staging liver fibrosis
Within 6 weeks of liver biopsy
Study Arms (1)
Hepatis C, Hepatitis B, NAFLD
All patients enrolled will undergo: * Transient Elastography (Fibroscan) * Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) * Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE)
Interventions
Transient elastography (Fibroscan) Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE)
Eligibility Criteria
The target population is adults with any of the three main causes of liver fibrosis: HBV, HCV or NASH. For the purpose of this study, we will recruit patients seen at the hepatology clinic of St-Luc Hospital, a tertiary care center.
You may qualify if:
- are adults;
- must undergo a liver biopsy as part of their clinical standard of care for suspected or known chronic liver disease caused by HBV, HCV or NASH;
- understand French or English instruction;
- Autoimmune Hepatitis
You may not qualify if:
- have any contra-indication to MRI (such as claustrophobia, pacemaker, metallic clips for a neurosurgical procedure);
- are pregnant or trying to become pregnant;
- have a weight or girth preventing them from entering the MR magnet bore;
- are unable to understand or unwilling to provide written informed consent for this study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 0A9, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Lefebvre T, Wartelle-Bladou C, Wong P, Sebastiani G, Giard JM, Castel H, Murphy-Lavallee J, Olivie D, Ilinca A, Sylvestre MP, Gilbert G, Gao ZH, Nguyen BN, Cloutier G, Tang A. Prospective comparison of transient, point shear wave, and magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis. Eur Radiol. 2019 Dec;29(12):6477-6488. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06331-4. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
PMID: 31278577DERIVED
Biospecimen
Liver biopsy specimens.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
An Tang, MD, MSc
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 20, 2014
First Posted
January 24, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2018
Study Completion
June 1, 2018
Last Updated
September 20, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-07