NCT02042313

Brief Summary

Esophagectomy is a major surgical procedure often associated with significant morbidity and mortality and significant level of postoperative pain. In contrast to open esophagectomy where epidural pain control has been considered as a gold standard and could be crucial in affecting outcome the analgesic scheme for minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is yet to be established. We would like to compare continuous epidural analgesia and continuous paravertebral block combined with single shot subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in the analgesic effects, levels of cytokines, and postoperative complications in patients receiving MIE.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
58

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 15, 2014

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 22, 2014

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2014

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

December 16, 2015

Status Verified

December 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

January 15, 2014

Last Update Submit

December 15, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Intraoperative hypotension ( > 30% decline in the preoperative systolic/diastolic blood pressure)

    during operation

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • NRS pain score

    postoperative day 0 to 4

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Tidal volume

    postoperative day 1 to4

Study Arms (2)

Epidural

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Epidural catheters will be applied at the T6-8 level prior to the induction. 6 ml of 2% xylocaine with 1 in 200,000 epinephrine administered before surgery. During the surgery, 2% xylocaine with 1 in 200,000 epinephrine infusion will be administered at a rate of 2-10 ml/hour adjusted according to patient's blood pressure. After surgery, 0.125% levobupivacaine with 2.5μg fentanyl and 1 in 400,000 epinephrine will be given at a rate of 0.10-0.15 ml kg-1 h-1 (0.5 h lock and 2 ml bolus) through a patient-controlled infusion pump.

Other: continuous epidural infusion

combined PVB TAP

EXPERIMENTAL

Paravertebral catheterization into the paravertebral region ipsilateral to the VATS incision as described by Murata at the level of T7-8 will be performed. 10 ml of 2% xylocaine with 1 in 200,000 epinephrine to initiate analgesia. During the surgery, 2% xylocaine with 1 in 200,000 epinephrine infusion will be administered at a rate of 2-10 ml/hour adjusted according to patient's blood pressure. After the surgery, 0.125% levobupivacaine with 2.5μg fentanyl and 1 in 400,000 epinephrine will be administered at the rate of 0.10-0.15 ml kg-1 h-1 (0.5 h lock and 2 ml bolus) through a patient-controlled infusion pump. Ultrasound-guided (USG) subcostal TAP block will be performed at the end of surgery. Fifteen milliliters of 0.5% levobupivacaine with 1 in 400,000 epinephrine will be injected in incremental doses on each side of the abdomen.

Other: combined paravertebral infusion and single shot of TAP block

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient has a physical status between ASA I and III
  • years of age
  • Patient has signed an informed consent
  • Without contraindication of GA, EA or PVB

You may not qualify if:

  • ASA \> III
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Bleeding disorders
  • Being pregnant
  • Contraindications to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs),
  • Allergy to amide-type local anesthetics or NSAIDs
  • Infection at the thoracic paravertebral injection site
  • Severe spine or chest wall deformity
  • Patients with major psychosis or drug and alcohol abuse
  • Patients with a history of significant neurological, psychiatric, neuromuscular, cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal or hepatic disease
  • Patients with physical disability that precludes complete cooperation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center

Taipei, Taiwan, 11259, Taiwan

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsHead and Neck NeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Nai Liang Li, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2014

First Posted

January 22, 2014

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion

December 1, 2016

Last Updated

December 16, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-12

Locations