Comparison of Efficacy of Paravertebral and Epidural Analgesia After Videothoracoscopic Lung Lobectomy
Comparison of Continuous Epidural and Continuous Paravertebral Blockade in Postoperative Analgesia After Videothoracoscopic Lung Lobectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Thoracic surgery correlates with significant pain in postoperative period. In order to alleviate the pain various combinations of pharmaceuticals and administration methods are employed. So as to reduce the extent of surgical trauma and, consequently, correlated pain various operation techniques are used. In traditional thoracotomy epidural anesthesia remains a golden standard. Epidural anesthesia however demands high skills to be performed correctly and presents an increased risk of grave complications. In videothoracoscopic (VATS) operations paravertebral blockade can be employed, yet there is no certainty if its efficacy after lung lobectomy. We therefore designed a prospective, randomized, parallel group, single site study to test the hypothesis, that continuous paravertebral blockade is as efficient in postoperative pain reduction as continuous epidural blockade and possesses a higher safety profile.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 lung-cancer
Started Jan 2013
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 lung-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 13, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2014
CompletedJune 12, 2017
June 1, 2017
1.4 years
January 13, 2014
June 9, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
pain intensity measured in VAS in predetermined time intervals after the operation
up to 96 hrs after the surgery
Secondary Outcomes (4)
respiratory parameters indirectly indicating conditions for efficient cough: peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC)
up to 96 hrs after the surgery
frequency of side effects of regional anesthesia: urine retention resulting in necessity of bladder catheterization, hypotension, respiratory depression
up to 96 hrs after surgery
frequency of respiratory complications: atelectasis or pneumonia
up to 96 hrs after surgery
cumulative opioid (morphine) consumption
up to 96 hrs after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Continuous Thoracic Paravertebral Block
EXPERIMENTAL1. continuous thoracic paravertebral blockade 0,08 ml/kg/h with bupivacaine 0,25% + epinephrine 1:200.000 2. patient-controlled analgesia (morphine), bolus dose 2 mg, lockout time 10 min
Continuous Thoracic Epidural Analgesia
EXPERIMENTAL1. continuous thoracic epidural block 0,06 ml/kg/h with bupivacaine 0,25% + epinephrine 1:200.000 2. patient-controlled analgesia (morphine), bolus dose 2 mg, lockout time 10 min
Interventions
Before anesthesia, continuous thoracic epidural block of T5/T6 is performed (Portex Epidural Minipack set). Identification of paravertebral space by loss of resistance technique (air). A catheter is advanced ca. 3-5 cm, and test dose with 2 ml of lidocaine 2% i injected. At the end of surgery syringe with 0,25% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200.000 is connected to catheter and 6 ml bolus is injected, followed by an infusion of the same mixture at 0,06 ml/kg/h for postoperative pain management.
Before anesthesia, continuous thoracic paravertebral block of T5/T6 is performed (Portex Epidural Minipack set). Identification of paravertebral space by loss of resistance technique (normal saline). After injection of 5-10 ml of normal saline a catheter is advanced medially ca. 5 cm. At the end of surgery syringe with 0,25% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200.000 is connected to catheter and 20 ml bolus is injected, followed by an infusion of the same mixture at 0,08 ml/kg/h for postoperative pain management
Once arrived at the PACU all patients are placed on a postoperative analgesia regimen, that include: * patient-controlled analgesia with morphine (bolus dose 2 mg, lockout time 10 min) * paracetamol 1000 mg iv every 8 hrs * ketoprofen 100 mg iv every 12 hrs
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1-3
- undergo videothoracoscopic lung lobectomy
- forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) \>1,5 l/min
- no contraindications for epidural anesthesia and paravertebral nerve blockade
- ability to comprehend principles of VAS pain examination method and to communicate in accordance with them.
You may not qualify if:
- prior to the study: contraindications for local anesthesia, ASA\>3, FEV1\<1,5 l/min, conditions disabling the patient from comprehending the principles of VAS pain examination, known allergy to used medications.
- during the study: failure to place epidural or paravertebral catheter, decision to abandon lobar resection (e.g. in case of neoplastic dissemination), intraoperative conversion to thoracotomy, intraoperative anatomical obstacles to distribution of local anesthetics, conditions disabling the patient from pain evaluation by means of VAS method (e.g. postoperative delirium), necessity to administer other pharmaceuticals influencing pain perception (e.g. sedatives), necessity of mechanical ventilation, interruption of local anesthesia as a result of technical problems (e.g. damage or slippage of catheter).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pulmonary Hospital
Zakopane, 34-500, Poland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 13, 2014
First Posted
January 20, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
July 1, 2014
Last Updated
June 12, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06