Non-sedation Versus Sedation With a Daily Wake-up Trial in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Me-chanical Ventilation - Effects on Cognitive Function
Substudy of the NONSEDA Trial (NCT01967680): Non-sedation Versus Sedation With a Daily Wake-up Trial in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Me-chanical Ventilation - Effects on Cognitive Function
1 other identifier
interventional
205
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Through many years, the standard care has been to use continuous sedation of critically ill patients during mechanical ventilation. However, preliminary randomised clinical trials indicate that it is beneficial to reduce the sedation level in these patients. The NONSEDA trial is an investigator-initiated, randomised, clinical, parallel-group, multinational, superiority trial designed to include 700 patients from at least six ICUs in Denmark, Norway and Sweden, comparing no sedation with sedation and a daily wake-up trial during mechanical ventilation. This is a substudy of the NONSEDA trial, concerning 250 patients included at trialsite Kolding, Denmark. The aim of the substudy is to assess the effects of no sedation on delirium during admission and cognitive function after discharge from ICU. Our hypothesis is that critically ill patients who are not sedated during mechanical ventilation will have better cognitive function after discharge.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 14, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2019
CompletedMarch 15, 2019
March 1, 2019
3.4 years
January 10, 2014
March 14, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cognitive function
Cognitive t-score, in percentage, difference between the two groups. The t-score for each patient will be diagnosed by the neuropsycologist at a personal interview and use of following tests: * Span of numbers * Coding test * Trailmaking A+B * Rey auditory verbal learning test (immediate, recall) * Rey-Ostherrieth complex figure test (immediate, recall, recognition) * Word finding test (S-word, animals) * Stroop test (congruent+incongruent)
3 months after discharge from ICU
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Attention/concentration
3 months after discharge from ICU
Learning/memory
3 months after discharge from ICU
Executive dysfunction
3 months after discharge from ICU
Mental pace
3 months after discharge from ICU
Hypoactive delirium
3 months after discharge from ICU
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Non-sedation
EXPERIMENTALNon-sedation supplemented with pain management during mechanical ventilation.
Sedation
ACTIVE COMPARATORCurrent gold standard: Sedation with a daily wake-up trial.
Interventions
Patients are awake or have natural sleep during mechanical ventilation. Pain is treated with morphine iv.
Continuous iv-sedation (propofol first 48 hours, from then midazolam) to Ramsey 3-4 with a daily wake up attempt, where sedation is stopped until patient is awake.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Endotracheally intubated
- Expected time on ventilator \> 24 hours
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Severe head trauma where therapeutic coma is indicated
- Therapeutic hypothermia where therapeutic coma is indicated
- Status epilepticus where therapeutic coma is indicated
- Patient has participated in the study before
- Patient is transferred from another ICU with length of stay \> 48 hours
- Patient is comatose at admission
- PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 9, if sedation is necessary for oxygenation
- Patient does not speak Danish, swedish or norwegian at a reasonable level
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Palle Toftlead
- Kolding Sygehuscollaborator
- University of Southern Denmarkcollaborator
- The Danish Council for Strategic Researchcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, Intensive Care Unit
Kolding, 6000, Denmark
Related Publications (1)
Nedergaard HK, Jensen HI, Stylsvig M, Lauridsen JT, Toft P. Non-sedation versus sedation with a daily wake-up trial in critically ill patients recieving mechanical ventilation - effects on long-term cognitive function: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, a substudy of the NONSEDA trial. Trials. 2016 Jun 1;17(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1390-5.
PMID: 27250658DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Helene Joergensen, MD
Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2014
First Posted
January 14, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2019
Last Updated
March 15, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03