Non-sedation Versus Sedation With a Daily Wake-up Trial in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation - Effects on Physical Function
Substudy of Non-Seda Trial (NCT01967680): Non-sedation Versus Sedation With a Daily Wake-up Trial in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation - Effects on Physical Function. An Investigator-initiated, Randomised, Clinical, Parallel-group, Multinational, Superiority Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
205
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Critically ill, ventilator-treated patients rapidly loose much of their muscle mass and strength. This can attribute to prolonged admission, prolonged mechanical ventilation, increased mortality and might have a negative impact on the physical function, degree of independence and quality of life. The pathophysiological background for the loss of muscle mass as well as possible effective treatment is still not well established. In the NONSEDA-trial we randomise critically ill patients to non-sedation or sedation with a daily wake-up trial during mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU). It has never been assessed whether non-sedation reduces the loss of muscle mass and strength. Aim: To assess the effects of non-sedation versus sedation with a daily wake-up trial on physical function after discharge from ICU. Hypothesis: that non-sedation during ventilator-treatment will improve the physical function after ICU-discharge, compared with standard treatment of sedation with a daily wake-up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 9, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 14, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2019
CompletedMarch 15, 2019
March 1, 2019
3.4 years
January 9, 2014
March 14, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Physical function
Co-primary outcome of: patient-reported quality of life, as measured by SF-36v2, physical component and degree of independence in activities of daily living, as measured by Barthel Index. Since this is a co-primary outcome, the type I error probability associated with the test of the null hypothesis should be less than 0,025.
3 months after ICU-discharge
Secondary Outcomes (4)
6 minute walk
3 months after ICU-discharge
Handgrip
3 months after ICU-discharge
Thigh muscle size
3 months after ICU-discharge
Biomechanical data
3 months after ICU-discharge
Other Outcomes (3)
Biomechanical data
Within 24 hours of ICU-discharge
Handgrip
Within 24 hours of ICU-discharge
Thigh muscle size
Within 24 hours of ICU-discharge
Study Arms (2)
Non-sedation
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group will not receive sedatives. Patients are thoroughly and repeatedly informed by the staff of where they are, what have happened, and what type of treatment they are going to receive. Participants will be awake and have a natural sleep rhythm. In case these patients develop and outward delirium, it is necessary to have a nurse or other caregiver at the bedside in order to calm the patient. Patients with delirium will be treated with haloperidol.
Sedation with daily wake-up
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group will be sedated to Ramsay score 3-4. The first 48 hours the patients will be sedated with propofol, after 48 hours midazolam will be used. During daytime, the patient will be awakened as the intravenous infusion of sedatives will be discontinued. The patient will be considered to be awake when he/she can perform at least three of the following four tasks: * Open the eyes to verbal commands. * Follow the examiner's instructions with the eyes. * Squeeze hands on request. * Stick out the tongue on request. After a successful wake-up, the infusion of sedative will be resumed, starting on half of the pre-wake-up dose and adjusted to Ramsey score 3-4.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Endotracheally intubated
- Expected time on ventilator \> 24 hours
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Severe head trauma where therapeutic coma is indicated
- Therapeutic hypothermia where therapeutic coma is indicated
- Status epilepticus where therapeutic coma is indicated
- Patient has participated in the study before
- Patient is transferred from another ICU with length of stay \> 48 hours
- Patient is comatose at admission
- PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 9, if sedation is necessary for oxygenation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Palle Toftlead
- Sygehus Lillebaeltcollaborator
- University of Southern Denmarkcollaborator
- The Danish Council for Strategic Researchcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding
Kolding, 6000, Denmark
Related Publications (3)
Strom T, Martinussen T, Toft P. A protocol of no sedation for critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010 Feb 6;375(9713):475-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62072-9. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
PMID: 20116842BACKGROUNDNedergaard HK, Jensen HI, Olsen HT, Strom T, Lauridsen JT, Sjogaard G, Toft P. Effect of non-sedation on physical function in survivors of critical illness - A substudy of the NONSEDA randomized trial. J Crit Care. 2021 Apr;62:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.11.017. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
PMID: 33276294DERIVEDNedergaard HK, Jensen HI, Lauridsen JT, Sjogaard G, Toft P. Non-sedation versus sedation with a daily wake-up trial in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation--effects on physical function: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: a substudy of the NONSEDA trial. Trials. 2015 Jul 23;16:310. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0856-1.
PMID: 26201718DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Helene K Nedergaard, MD
Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 9, 2014
First Posted
January 14, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2019
Last Updated
March 15, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03