NCT02029755

Brief Summary

Postoperative analgesia is an important part of the anesthetic care. According to the recent studies, multimodal analgesia can provide better analgesia \& patient satisfaction with fewer side effect. For example, combining intravenous, intramuscular or oral analgesics with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block or local anesthetic (LA) infiltration as the multimodal analgesia, can furnish a more effective pain control after the abdominal surgery. For abdominal surgery, both local infiltration and TAP block target on relieving somatic pain. Local anesthetic wound infiltration is easy to perform with low risk. As the advancement of ultrasound technology, performing the TAP block also becomes easier, safer and more accurate. But whether LA infiltration or TAP block is better for the multimodal analgesia regimen remains unclear. This study is to compare the postoperative pain score, opioid consumption, side effects, and quality of recovery between these two analgesic methods in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. The investigators hypothesized that TAP block may be more effective than LA infiltration as a part of the multimodal analgesia, and can improve the recovery after the abdominal surgery.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
108

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable postoperative-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2013

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable postoperative-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 5, 2014

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 8, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2014

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 8, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

June 8, 2015

Status Verified

May 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

January 5, 2014

Results QC Date

November 21, 2014

Last Update Submit

May 24, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

transversus abdominis plane blocklocal infiltrationropivacaineheart rate variabilitypostoperative analgesia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Pain Score (NRS: Numerical Rating Scale)

    pain scores of the participants will be followed at postoperative 1, 6, 24, 48 hour (up to 48 hours). (NRS: from 0 to 10, 0 = no pain, 10 = the worst pain) The higher score idicates the worse outcome.

    postoperative 24 hour dynamic

  • Opioid Consumption

    opioid consumption of the participants will be followed at postoperative 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 hour (up to 48 hours).

    postoperative 48 hour

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Sedation Scale

    postoperative 1, 6, 24, 48 hour

  • Nausea and Vomiting Categorical Score

    postoperative 1, 6, 24, 48 hour

  • Rescue Analgesic Use

    postoperative 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 hour

  • Rescue Antiemetics Use

    postoperative 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 hour

  • Time to the First Request of Analgesics

    an expected average of 5 days

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

TAP block

EXPERIMENTAL

postoperative analgesia with sono-guided transversus abdominis plane block and intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). Bilateral sono-guided TAP block will be performed after the induction of general anesthesia. 20 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine will be injected to the transversus abdominis plane under ultrasound guidance at each side (total 40 ml). IV-PCA with morphine will be ready for postoperative pain control at the end of the surgery.

Procedure: transversus abdominis plane blockProcedure: Patient controlled analgesia

Local infiltration

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

postoperative analgesia with local anesthetics infiltration at surgical wound and intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine will be injected at the surgical wound by the surgeon before the closure of wound. IV-PCA with morphine will be ready for postoperative pain control at the end of the surgery.

Procedure: local infiltrationProcedure: Patient controlled analgesia

PCA only

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

postoperative analgesia with intravenous patient controlled analgesia. IV-PCA with morphine will be ready for postoperative pain control at the end of the surgery.

Procedure: Patient controlled analgesia

Interventions

bilateral ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block, with 20 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine at each side after the induction of general anesthesia

TAP block

local anesthetics infiltration at surgical wound with 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine before wound closure

Also known as: local anesthetics infiltration
Local infiltration

postoperative analgesia with intravenous patient controlled analgesia with morphine

Local infiltrationPCA onlyTAP block

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult (20\~65y/o)
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I\~II
  • Patients scheduled for regular abdominal surgery under general anesthesia

You may not qualify if:

  • ASA physical status ≥ 3
  • Allergy to morphine or local anesthetics
  • Morphine tolerance
  • Drug abuse or addiction
  • Bleeding tendency

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Taipei Medical University Hospital

Taipei, Taiwan, 110, Taiwan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

Anesthesia, LocalAnalgesia, Patient-Controlled

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anesthesia, ConductionAnesthesiaAnesthesia and AnalgesiaAnalgesia

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Hsiao-Chien Tsai
Organization
Taipei medical university hospital

Study Officials

  • Chuen-Chau Chang, PhD

    Taipei Medical University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
fellow researcher

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2014

First Posted

January 8, 2014

Study Start

December 1, 2013

Primary Completion

April 1, 2014

Study Completion

June 1, 2014

Last Updated

June 8, 2015

Results First Posted

June 8, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-05

Locations