Effect of Diltiazem on Coronary Artery Ectasia
Short Term Effect of Diltiazem on Myocardial Perfusion in Patients With Isolated Coronary Artery Ectasia- a Prospective Clinical Study
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) has been defined as localized or diffuse dilatation of epicardial coronary arteries more than 1.5 fold of adjacent normal segments. Isolated CAE constitutes minor portion of the total CAE cases, with an incidence of 0.1% to 0.79% in which coronary artery stenosis or severe valvular heart diseases are not present. CAE represents not only an anatomical variant but also a clinical constellation of coronary artery disease (CAD) like association with myocardial ischemia and acute coronary syndromes. Patients with CAE without significant coronary narrowing may still present with angina pectoris, positive stress tests, or acute coronary syndromes. Impaired epicardial and microvascular perfusion were demonstrated in ectatic coronary arteries. Myocardial blush grading (MBG) technique has been utilized in various conditions such as acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery ectasia, syndrome X and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy to evaluate myocardial perfusion. There is still no consensus for management of CAE. Previously improvement of coronary flow has been demonstrated by mibefradil in patients with slow coronary flow. A new trial is needed to explore the effect of calcium channel blockers (CCB) in isolated CAE. Diltiazem improves myocardial perfusion by blocking calcium channels in coronary arteries. This agent has been widely used in coronary catheter labs to prevent and treat no-reflow. The current study with prospective design was therefore set up to assess whether epicardial flow and tissue level perfusion would be improved by diltiazem in myocardial regions subtended by the ectatic coronary arteries among patients with isolated CAE.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 29, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 31, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2015
CompletedMay 6, 2015
May 1, 2015
2.9 years
December 29, 2013
May 5, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Myocardial blush grade
Myocardial blush grade which is a measure of myocardial perfusion will be analysed just after administration of intracoronary diltiazem.
within 3 minutes after intracoronary diltiazem administration
TIMI (Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) flow grade
TIMI (Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) flow grade which is a measure of epicardial flow rate will be measured just after administration of intracoronary diltiazem
Within 3 minutes after intracoronary administration of diltiazem
TIMI (Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) frame count
TIMI (Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) frame count which is a measure of epicardial flow rate will be analysed just after administration of intracoronary diltiazem
within 3 minutes after intracoronary administration of diltiazem
Study Arms (2)
Diltiazem
ACTIVE COMPARATORintracoronary diltiazem 5 milligrams which is diluted with 5 mL of saline
Saline
PLACEBO COMPARATORintracoronary saline 5 mL
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with known allergy to diltiazem acute coronary syndrome left ventricular systolic dysfunction significant valvular heart disease heart failure systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg heart rate \<60 atrioventricular block (grade \> I) severe liver or kidney failure significant coronary artery stenosis and patients on treatment with calcium channel blockers were excluded
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ankara University School Of Medicine, Department of Cardiology
Ankara, 06230, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 29, 2013
First Posted
December 31, 2013
Study Start
June 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
May 1, 2015
Last Updated
May 6, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-05