Prospective Study on Oncologic Cerebral Imagery Contribution by 18F-FDOPA Position Emission Tomography (PET)
IMOTEP
1 other identifier
interventional
85
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In standard care for patients diagnosed with a primary or secondary (metastasis) cerebral tumor, there is currently complex clinical situations in which the clinic and Magnetic Resonance Imagery (MRI) do not allow for the medical team to arrive at a conclusive diagnosis. The therapeutic proposition requires then a delay in additional follow-up of at least 3 months in order to clarify the situation, with a potential delay in diagnosis and therefore therapeutic care. The contribution of cerebral molecular imagery could allow for new additional information to be brought in or to increase the confidence index in the diagnosis in order to comfort the therapeutic collective attitude proposed in the multidisciplinary meeting (MM). 3.4-dihydroxy-6-18F-fluoro-L-phenylalanine (18F-FD0PA), dopamine precursor amino-acid, Position Emission Tomography (PET), allows for the studying in vivo of the proteic transmembrane transport in gliomatous tissue; active transport happens through a sodic-independent canal, increased in malicious transformations, and in which kinetics can give an indication regarding the development of the primary tumor. In MRIs, tumor tissue growth after injecting the contrast product translates to a rupture in the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB), while tumor extraction from the radiopharmaceutical is independent of the state of integrity of the BBB and whose only function is metabolic tissue activity. This method of imagery thus appears as a promising contribution to conventional imagery. Furthermore, different to 18F-FDG (18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose fluorodeoxyglucose), similar to the largely used glucose in oncologic molecular imagery, exploration of harmful glioma in 18F-FDOPA, is not compromised by background noise activity, and is almost useless in a healthy cerebral cortex, with the exception of striatal physiological fixation used as a level of reference. The best performances in terms of positive and negative predictive value were defined in the literature with a tumor/striatum threshold of 1. According to the latest and current European recommendations, turning to PET when caring for high-level gliomas patients can be proposed in the evaluation of therapeutic responses. However, very few studies have evaluated the in-practice current clinical contributions of PET and put it into perspective with classic clinical radiological data.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 19, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 30, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedApril 23, 2026
April 1, 2026
2 years
November 19, 2013
April 20, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
confidence level in the therapeutic decision regarding the results from PET 18F-FDOPA imagery, in comparison with MRI alone.
1 year up to 2 years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Validation of the decision taken with knowledge of the results from the PET 18F-FDOPA for post-operated patients
1 year up to 2 years
evaluation of PET 18F-FDOPA contribution according to clinical situations
1 year up to 2 years
Study Arms (1)
PET 18FDOPA
OTHERPET 18FDOPA
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with a historically proven high level of glimoa or of cerebral metastases
- Patients who have their files presented in a neurological oncologic CMM in one of the following situations:
- Diagnosis doubt between radionecrosis and tumor progression
- Evaluation at the end of the radio and chemotherapy period
- Evaluation under anti-angiogenic 18 years or older Patients who have been informed and have signed the consent form indicated in the study Patients with insurance coverage
You may not qualify if:
- Patients for whom having an MRI or a PET 18F-FDOPA would be contraindicated in light of any co-morbidities or allergies that it reveals
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Nice, 06189, France
Related Publications (1)
Humbert O, Bourg V, Mondot L, Gal J, Bondiau PY, Fontaine D, Saada-Bouzid E, Paquet M, Chardin D, Almairac F, Vandenbos F, Darcourt J. 18F-DOPA PET/CT in brain tumors: impact on multidisciplinary brain tumor board decisions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Mar;46(3):558-568. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4240-8. Epub 2019 Jan 5.
PMID: 30612162RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jacques DARCOURT, phd
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 19, 2013
First Posted
December 30, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
November 1, 2015
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04