Post-market Clinical Follow-up of a Magnetic Bone Conduction Implant (Cochlear Baha Attract System)
1 other identifier
interventional
54
4 countries
6
Brief Summary
The rationale behind this post-market clinical follow-up investigation is to collect data regarding the usability and clinical performance of the Baha Attract System in subjects with hearing impairment that are candidates for Baha surgery:
- to evaluate the efficacy of the Baha Attract System in terms of hearing performance compared to the unaided situation and compared to a pre-operative test situation using the sound processor on a Baha Softband;
- to evaluate the mid- and long-term safety of the Baha Attract System.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 27, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 9, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2017
CompletedOctober 12, 2018
October 1, 2018
1.7 years
December 16, 2013
August 24, 2016
October 10, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Hearing Performance: Threshold Audiometry PTA4: Unaided Versus Baha Attract
The change of hearing performance with the Baha Attract System (aided) at 6, 12 and 24 months from the unaided hearing performance before surgery; measured as free-field hearing tests: Threshold audiometry PTA4 (mean of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz). The units reported for PTA4 are decibels (dB). As such, a lower or more negative score is more desirable and reflects the ability to hear softer sounds.
Baseline (unaided) before surgery, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Hearing Performance: Change in Threshold Audiometry: Unaided Versus Baha Attract
The change of hearing performance with the Baha Attract System (aided) from the unaided hearing performance before surgery; measured as free-field hearing tests: Threshold audiometry PTA4 (mean of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz). The units reported for PTA4 are decibels (dB). As such, a lower or more negative score is more desirable and reflects the ability to hear softer sounds.
Baseline (unaided) before surgery, 24 months after surgery
Hearing Performance: Change in Threshold Audiometry: Unaided Versus Baha Attract
The change of hearing performance with the Baha Attract System (aided) from the unaided hearing performance before surgery; measured as free-field hearing tests: Threshold audiometry at frequencies of 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000 and 6000 Hz). The units reported for threshold audiometry are decibels (dB). As such, a lower or more negative score is more desirable and reflects the ability to hear softer sounds.
Baseline (unaided) before surgery, 12 months after surgery
Hearing Performance: Change in Threshold Audiometry: Unaided Versus Baha Attract
The change of hearing performance with the Baha Attract System (aided) from the unaided hearing performance before surgery; measured as free-field hearing tests: Threshold audiometry at individual frequencies 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000 and 6000 Hz. The units reported for threshold audiometry are decibels (dB). As such, a lower or more negative score is more desirable and reflects the ability to hear softer sounds.
Baseline (unaided) before surgery, 6 months after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (19)
Adaptive Speech Recognition in Noise Ratio: Unaided Versus Baha Attract
Baseline (unaided) before surgery, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Speech in Quiet, Baha Attract Versus Unaided
Baseline before surgery, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Hearing Performance: Threshold Audiometry PTA4: Sound Processor on Softband Versus Baha Attract
Baseline before surgery, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Hearing Performance: Threshold Audiometry Individual Frequencies: Baha Attract Versus Sound Processor on Softband
Baseline (aided) before surgery, 6 months after surgery
Hearing Performance: Threshold Audiometry Individual Frequencies: Baha Attract Versus Sound Processor on Softband
Baseline (aided) before surgery, 12 months after surgery
- +14 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Baha Attract System
EXPERIMENTALThis transcutaneous solution is based on a magnet coupling using magnets on both side of the skin; * One implant magnet * One external magnet on which a sound processor is attached, i.e. the Sound Processor magnet (SP magnet)
Interventions
The Cochlear Baha Attract System incorporates both implantable and external parts. The implantable parts include the BI300 Implant and the BIM400 Implant Magnet, which is intended to be fixated to the BI300 Implant. The external parts include the Sound Processor Magnet (SP Magnet), which, together with the Implant Magnet, constitute the transcutaneous coupling. The SP Magnet incorporates a soft material (Soft pad) at the tissue facing surface that is designed to distribute the pressure over the skin. The Baha Sound Processor attaches to the SP Magnet via a snap coupling.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult subject, i.e. ≥ 18 years of age
- Conductive or mixed hearing loss in the ear to be implanted:
- Bone conduction thresholds with a pure tone average PTA4 of \< 30 dB hearing level (mean of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz).
- Single-sided sensorineural deafness (SSD):
- European sites: Bone conduction thresholds with a pure tone average PTA4 of \< 30dB hearing level (mean of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz) in the good ear.
- US sites: Air conduction thresholds with a pure tone average PTA4 of 20 dB hearing level (mean of 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 Hz) in the good ear OR Subject is indicated for an AC CROS but-for some reason-cannot or will not use an AC CROS.
- No previous bone conduction implant on the side of the skull to be implanted. Signed informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Suitable implant position for the BI300 Implant (4 mm or 3 mm) not found during surgery due to insufficient bone quality and/or bone thickness.
- Less than 3 mm soft tissue thickness at the planned implant site. Subjects that have received radiation therapy at the same side of the skull where the Baha Attract System will be positioned.
- Condition that could jeopardise osseointegration and/or wound healing as judged by the investigator (e.g. osteoporosis, psoriasis, use of corticosteroids).
- Uncontrolled diabetes as judged by the investigator. Condition that may have an impact on the outcome of the investigation as judged by the investigator.
- Unable to follow investigational procedures (e.g. to complete quality of life scales).
- Participation in another investigation with pharmaceuticals and/or medical device.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
Dr. Doug Backhus
Seattle, Washington, 98122, United States
Christina Runge
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53227, United States
Dr. Myrthe Hol
Nijmegen, Netherlands
World Hearing Center Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing
Kajetany, Nadarzyn, 05-830, Poland
Peter Monksfield
Birmingham, United Kingdom
Kevin Green
Manchester, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Professor Emmanuel Mylanus
- Organization
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Johan Blechert, M.Sc
Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AB
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2013
First Posted
December 27, 2013
Study Start
June 1, 2014
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
November 1, 2017
Last Updated
October 12, 2018
Results First Posted
December 9, 2016
Record last verified: 2018-10