NCT02022085

Brief Summary

The rationale behind this post-market clinical follow-up investigation is to collect data regarding the usability and clinical performance of the Baha Attract System in subjects with hearing impairment that are candidates for Baha surgery:

  • to evaluate the efficacy of the Baha Attract System in terms of hearing performance compared to the unaided situation and compared to a pre-operative test situation using the sound processor on a Baha Softband;
  • to evaluate the mid- and long-term safety of the Baha Attract System.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
54

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2014

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
4 countries

6 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 16, 2013

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 27, 2013

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2014

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2016

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 9, 2016

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

October 12, 2018

Status Verified

October 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

December 16, 2013

Results QC Date

August 24, 2016

Last Update Submit

October 10, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Hearing Performance: Threshold Audiometry PTA4: Unaided Versus Baha Attract

    The change of hearing performance with the Baha Attract System (aided) at 6, 12 and 24 months from the unaided hearing performance before surgery; measured as free-field hearing tests: Threshold audiometry PTA4 (mean of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz). The units reported for PTA4 are decibels (dB). As such, a lower or more negative score is more desirable and reflects the ability to hear softer sounds.

    Baseline (unaided) before surgery, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery

  • Hearing Performance: Change in Threshold Audiometry: Unaided Versus Baha Attract

    The change of hearing performance with the Baha Attract System (aided) from the unaided hearing performance before surgery; measured as free-field hearing tests: Threshold audiometry PTA4 (mean of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz). The units reported for PTA4 are decibels (dB). As such, a lower or more negative score is more desirable and reflects the ability to hear softer sounds.

    Baseline (unaided) before surgery, 24 months after surgery

  • Hearing Performance: Change in Threshold Audiometry: Unaided Versus Baha Attract

    The change of hearing performance with the Baha Attract System (aided) from the unaided hearing performance before surgery; measured as free-field hearing tests: Threshold audiometry at frequencies of 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000 and 6000 Hz). The units reported for threshold audiometry are decibels (dB). As such, a lower or more negative score is more desirable and reflects the ability to hear softer sounds.

    Baseline (unaided) before surgery, 12 months after surgery

  • Hearing Performance: Change in Threshold Audiometry: Unaided Versus Baha Attract

    The change of hearing performance with the Baha Attract System (aided) from the unaided hearing performance before surgery; measured as free-field hearing tests: Threshold audiometry at individual frequencies 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000 and 6000 Hz. The units reported for threshold audiometry are decibels (dB). As such, a lower or more negative score is more desirable and reflects the ability to hear softer sounds.

    Baseline (unaided) before surgery, 6 months after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (19)

  • Adaptive Speech Recognition in Noise Ratio: Unaided Versus Baha Attract

    Baseline (unaided) before surgery, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery

  • Speech in Quiet, Baha Attract Versus Unaided

    Baseline before surgery, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery

  • Hearing Performance: Threshold Audiometry PTA4: Sound Processor on Softband Versus Baha Attract

    Baseline before surgery, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery

  • Hearing Performance: Threshold Audiometry Individual Frequencies: Baha Attract Versus Sound Processor on Softband

    Baseline (aided) before surgery, 6 months after surgery

  • Hearing Performance: Threshold Audiometry Individual Frequencies: Baha Attract Versus Sound Processor on Softband

    Baseline (aided) before surgery, 12 months after surgery

  • +14 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Baha Attract System

EXPERIMENTAL

This transcutaneous solution is based on a magnet coupling using magnets on both side of the skin; * One implant magnet * One external magnet on which a sound processor is attached, i.e. the Sound Processor magnet (SP magnet)

Device: Baha Attract System

Interventions

The Cochlear Baha Attract System incorporates both implantable and external parts. The implantable parts include the BI300 Implant and the BIM400 Implant Magnet, which is intended to be fixated to the BI300 Implant. The external parts include the Sound Processor Magnet (SP Magnet), which, together with the Implant Magnet, constitute the transcutaneous coupling. The SP Magnet incorporates a soft material (Soft pad) at the tissue facing surface that is designed to distribute the pressure over the skin. The Baha Sound Processor attaches to the SP Magnet via a snap coupling.

Baha Attract System

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult subject, i.e. ≥ 18 years of age
  • Conductive or mixed hearing loss in the ear to be implanted:
  • Bone conduction thresholds with a pure tone average PTA4 of \< 30 dB hearing level (mean of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz).
  • Single-sided sensorineural deafness (SSD):
  • European sites: Bone conduction thresholds with a pure tone average PTA4 of \< 30dB hearing level (mean of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz) in the good ear.
  • US sites: Air conduction thresholds with a pure tone average PTA4 of 20 dB hearing level (mean of 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 Hz) in the good ear OR Subject is indicated for an AC CROS but-for some reason-cannot or will not use an AC CROS.
  • No previous bone conduction implant on the side of the skull to be implanted. Signed informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Suitable implant position for the BI300 Implant (4 mm or 3 mm) not found during surgery due to insufficient bone quality and/or bone thickness.
  • Less than 3 mm soft tissue thickness at the planned implant site. Subjects that have received radiation therapy at the same side of the skull where the Baha Attract System will be positioned.
  • Condition that could jeopardise osseointegration and/or wound healing as judged by the investigator (e.g. osteoporosis, psoriasis, use of corticosteroids).
  • Uncontrolled diabetes as judged by the investigator. Condition that may have an impact on the outcome of the investigation as judged by the investigator.
  • Unable to follow investigational procedures (e.g. to complete quality of life scales).
  • Participation in another investigation with pharmaceuticals and/or medical device.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (6)

Dr. Doug Backhus

Seattle, Washington, 98122, United States

Location

Christina Runge

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53227, United States

Location

Dr. Myrthe Hol

Nijmegen, Netherlands

Location

World Hearing Center Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing

Kajetany, Nadarzyn, 05-830, Poland

Location

Peter Monksfield

Birmingham, United Kingdom

Location

Kevin Green

Manchester, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DeafnessHearing LossHearing Loss, Conductive

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hearing DisordersEar DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Professor Emmanuel Mylanus
Organization
Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Study Officials

  • Johan Blechert, M.Sc

    Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AB

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2013

First Posted

December 27, 2013

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion

February 1, 2016

Study Completion

November 1, 2017

Last Updated

October 12, 2018

Results First Posted

December 9, 2016

Record last verified: 2018-10

Locations