Efficacy and Safety of Mitoxantrone in Patients With Refractory Neuromyelitis Optica and Spectrum Disorders
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The treatment protocol consisted of 12 mg/m2 MITO intravenous infusions every 3 months for 2 years. Dosage was adjusted according to side effects. Neurological assessment including the determination of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score and ophthalmologic evaluations were performed every 3 months and during relapses. Flow cytometric analysis, brain and spinal cord MRI was performed at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Mar 2009
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 3, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 27, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedDecember 27, 2013
December 1, 2013
5.8 years
September 3, 2013
December 19, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
annual relapse rate (ARR)
ARR is defined as the number of confirmed relapses in a year. The number of annual relapse rate was used as parameters of effectiveness and was compared between premitoxantrone and postmitoxantrone treatment during the follow-up period.
one year
EDSS
Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores was used as parameters of effectiveness and was compared between premitoxantrone and postmitoxantrone treatment during the follow-up period.
six months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Changes in LVEF
six months
blood cell count
three months
Flow cytometric analysis
six months
Study Arms (1)
MITO, annual relapse rate, safety
OTHERFor refractory NMO patients aged 18-55, the initial dose 12 mg/m2 mitoxantrone was administered over a five day course every 3 months for 2 years (a total of eight courses). The initial dose was reduced to 9 mg/m2 if the preinfusion white-blood-cell count was 3.0-3.99 ×109/L,and to 6 mg/m2 if the white-blood-cell count was 2.0-2.99 ×109/L. No infusion if the white-blood-cell count was less than 2.0×109/L. The initial dose was reduced to 10 mg/m2 for nonhaematological toxic effects of WHO grade 2-3. Subsequent dose after 3 month was reduced to 10 mg/m2 for infections that occurred within 3 weeks of a previous infusion accompanied by a white-blood-cell count below 2×109/L, or to 8 mg/m2 for infections accompanied by white-blood-cell count of less than 1×109/L.
Interventions
The treatment protocol consisted of 12 mg/m2 MITO intravenous infusions every 3 months for 2 years. Dosage was adjusted according to side effects.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Recurrent longitudinal myelitis (\>3 segments of spinal cord involvement by MRI) with or without recurrent ON (unilateral or bilateral) but with normal brain MRI and positive serological NMO IgG antibody.
- Recurrent longitudinal myelitis (\>3 segments of spinal cord involvement by MRI) with or without spatially limited brain lesion and positive serological NMO IgG antibody.
- NMO, fulfilled Wingerchuk 2006 Criteria for NMO.
- Patient presented at least 2 relapses during the 12 months preceding the start of mitoxantrone therapy, despite immunotherapies using corticosteroid, interferon beta, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, Cyclosporin A, Mycophenolate Mofetil or a combination of these drugs
- Extended Disability Status Score 3-8.
- Normal range for white-blood-cell count (more than 4×109/L), neutrophil count (more than 2×109/L), and platelet count (more than 100×109/L).
You may not qualify if:
- Cardiac risk factors (e.g history of congestive heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 50%
- Systemic diseases such as lupus, Sjogren's syndrome, anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome, sarcoidosis, rheumatoid arthritis, or vitamin B12 deficiency
- Previous treatment with mitoxantrone or anthracyclines
- Pregnant or planning to be pregnant
- Patients with severe liver disorders (WHO grade 4)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100053, China
Related Publications (4)
Hartung HP, Gonsette R, Konig N, Kwiecinski H, Guseo A, Morrissey SP, Krapf H, Zwingers T; Mitoxantrone in Multiple Sclerosis Study Group (MIMS). Mitoxantrone in progressive multiple sclerosis: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2002 Dec 21-28;360(9350):2018-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)12023-X.
PMID: 12504397BACKGROUNDNeuhaus O, Kieseier BC, Hartung HP. Therapeutic role of mitoxantrone in multiple sclerosis. Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jan;109(1-2):198-209. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.07.002. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
PMID: 16095713BACKGROUNDKim SH, Kim W, Park MS, Sohn EH, Li XF, Kim HJ. Efficacy and safety of mitoxantrone in patients with highly relapsing neuromyelitis optica. Arch Neurol. 2011 Apr;68(4):473-9. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.322. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
PMID: 21149806BACKGROUNDWeinstock-Guttman B, Ramanathan M, Lincoff N, Napoli SQ, Sharma J, Feichter J, Bakshi R. Study of mitoxantrone for the treatment of recurrent neuromyelitis optica (Devic disease). Arch Neurol. 2006 Jul;63(7):957-63. doi: 10.1001/archneur.63.7.957.
PMID: 16831964BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Huiqing Dong, Doctor
Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 3, 2013
First Posted
December 27, 2013
Study Start
March 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 27, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-12