NCT02021071

Brief Summary

Philips Healthcare has added a virtual path planner to the current commercially available XperGuide software platform and that has the potential to significantly reduce dose during image-guided needle interventions.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2013

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 27, 2013

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2013

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 27, 2013

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2014

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 12, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

March 16, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

November 27, 2013

Results QC Date

December 22, 2015

Last Update Submit

March 7, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • System Usability Scale (SUS) Score as a Measure of Qualitative Clinical Usefulness

    Evaluate the workflow, usability, and clinical impact of device by assessing clinical outcome and success of the procedures. The SUS is a simple, ten-item attitude Likert scale giving a global view of subjective assessments of usability developed by Brooke, J. The user needs to provide agreement or disagreement for the 10 statements. After the appearing of the SUS in literature and once part of the ISO standard ISO 9241 Part 11 it has become an industry standard and has been used for over 25 years to measure usability. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum core is 100. Analysis of 500 studies with SUS showed that the average SUS score is a 68. A SUS score above a 68 would be considered above average and anything below 68 is below average

    Patients will be followed starting from the procedure until hospital discharge or until 2 weeks after date of procedure at the latest

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Fluoroscopy Time

    Patients will be followed starting from the procedure until hospital discharge or until 2 weeks after date of procedure at the latest

Study Arms (2)

XperGuide

Image-guided needle procedures with XperGuide performed prior to this study within institution (retrospective data).

Radiation: XperGuide

XperGuide with virtual path planning

Image-guided needle procedures with XperGuide with virtual path planning

Radiation: XperGuide with virtual path planning

Interventions

XperGuideRADIATION

Live 3D image needle guidance which overlays live fluoroscopy and 3D soft tissue imaging data from previous acquired CT, MR or XperCT.

XperGuide

Instrument guidance allowing certain tasks that would normally occur using continuous X-ray guidance to be performed with reduced dose for patient and staff.

XperGuide with virtual path planning

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients of all ages. Patient weight is limited to the specification of the patient table.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients at any age who are referred for a clinically indicated XperGuide interventional procedure.
  • The informed consent has been signed by the participant, parent or legal guardian as appropriate.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant patients.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gastrointestinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMuscular DiseasesSpinal DiseasesVascular Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Rami Nachabe, PhD
Organization
Philips

Study Officials

  • John Racadio, MD

    Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2013

First Posted

December 27, 2013

Study Start

December 1, 2013

Primary Completion

June 1, 2014

Study Completion

June 1, 2014

Last Updated

March 16, 2022

Results First Posted

August 12, 2016

Record last verified: 2022-03

Locations