Virtual Path Planning for Image-guided Needle Interventions
Evaluation of Adding Virtual Path Planning to the Philips FD20 XperGuide to Reduce Radiation Dose During Image-guided Needle Interventional Procedures.
1 other identifier
observational
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Philips Healthcare has added a virtual path planner to the current commercially available XperGuide software platform and that has the potential to significantly reduce dose during image-guided needle interventions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Dec 2013
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 27, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 27, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 12, 2016
CompletedMarch 16, 2022
March 1, 2022
6 months
November 27, 2013
December 22, 2015
March 7, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
System Usability Scale (SUS) Score as a Measure of Qualitative Clinical Usefulness
Evaluate the workflow, usability, and clinical impact of device by assessing clinical outcome and success of the procedures. The SUS is a simple, ten-item attitude Likert scale giving a global view of subjective assessments of usability developed by Brooke, J. The user needs to provide agreement or disagreement for the 10 statements. After the appearing of the SUS in literature and once part of the ISO standard ISO 9241 Part 11 it has become an industry standard and has been used for over 25 years to measure usability. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum core is 100. Analysis of 500 studies with SUS showed that the average SUS score is a 68. A SUS score above a 68 would be considered above average and anything below 68 is below average
Patients will be followed starting from the procedure until hospital discharge or until 2 weeks after date of procedure at the latest
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Fluoroscopy Time
Patients will be followed starting from the procedure until hospital discharge or until 2 weeks after date of procedure at the latest
Study Arms (2)
XperGuide
Image-guided needle procedures with XperGuide performed prior to this study within institution (retrospective data).
XperGuide with virtual path planning
Image-guided needle procedures with XperGuide with virtual path planning
Interventions
Live 3D image needle guidance which overlays live fluoroscopy and 3D soft tissue imaging data from previous acquired CT, MR or XperCT.
Instrument guidance allowing certain tasks that would normally occur using continuous X-ray guidance to be performed with reduced dose for patient and staff.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients of all ages. Patient weight is limited to the specification of the patient table.
You may qualify if:
- Patients at any age who are referred for a clinically indicated XperGuide interventional procedure.
- The informed consent has been signed by the participant, parent or legal guardian as appropriate.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant patients.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Rami Nachabe, PhD
- Organization
- Philips
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Racadio, MD
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 27, 2013
First Posted
December 27, 2013
Study Start
December 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
March 16, 2022
Results First Posted
August 12, 2016
Record last verified: 2022-03