NCT02009930

Brief Summary

Hypothesis: Enlisted military members with 10 or more years of service and at least one cardiovascular risk factor will demonstrate a higher risk of future cardiac events as assessed by coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring than the risk calculated by the Framingham Risk Score.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
112

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2013

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 5, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 9, 2013

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 12, 2013

Completed
4.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 18, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 18, 2018

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 9, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

June 9, 2020

Status Verified

May 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

4.7 years

First QC Date

December 9, 2013

Results QC Date

February 26, 2020

Last Update Submit

May 27, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Military Active Duty EnlistedAtherosclerosisCoronary Artery Calcium (CAC)CardiovascularCAC ScoreFramingham ScoreCT Scan

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Prevalence of Atherosclerosis

    Percent of active duty enlisted military members with 10 or more years of military service determined to have a prevalence of atherosclerosis based on CAC risk category. The CAC risk category (scale), is derived from the CAC score (i.e., an estimate of the degree of atherosclerosis present in each participant's coronary arteries, reported as a number), and percentage by age to establish risk of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: Low risk = CAC of 0 and no cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, Low - Moderate risk = CAC of 0 with CV risk factors, Moderate - High risk: CAC 1-100 and percentile for age \<75%, High risk = CAC 100-399 or percentile for age \>75%, Very high risk = CAC \>100 and percentile for age \>90% or CAC \>400". Low risk is the best outcome, and very high risk is the worst.

    within 10 days of CT scan

  • Rate of Reclassification

    Percent/Number of subject that were reclassified from FRS to CAC risk category using CAC scores. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. The Framingham risk category (scale) = FRS to estimate the risk of a CV event over the next 10 years. The FRS uses age, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level, total cholesterol level, and smoking status to create a score that is converted into a 10-year CV disease risk % that correlates into a risk category: low, moderate, moderate - high risk, very high. For both scales, low is the best and very high is the worst outcome

    within 10 days of CT scan

  • Compare FRS to the CAC - At Least One Additional Risk Factor

    Compare FRS risk category to CAC risk category for enlisted subjects with at least 10 years of service and at least one additional CV risk factor to determine how well the results correlate with one another using the Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. The Framingham risk category (scale) = FRS to estimate the risk of a CV event over the next 10 years. The FRS uses age, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level, total cholesterol level, and smoking status to create a score that is converted into a 10-year CV disease risk % that correlates into a risk category: low, moderate, moderate - high risk, very high. For both scales, low is the best and very high is the worst outcome

    within 10 days of CT scan

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Metabolic Syndrome - Compare FRS to CAC

    within 10 days of CT scan

  • Living in the Dorms - Compare FRS to CAC

    within 10 days of CT scan

  • Physical Fitness (PT) Failures - Compare FRS to CAC

    within 10 days of CT scan

  • Years of Military Service - Compare FRS to CAC

    within 10 days of CT scan

  • Additional Cardiovascular Risk Factors - Compare FRS to CAC

    within 10 days of CT scan

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Active duty military enlisted members with 10 or more years of service

You may qualify if:

  • Active Duty Military Members with at least 10 years of service
  • Enlisted Rank
  • Males 35 years and older OR Females 45 years and older (please note the age difference is due to the fact that female plaque formation with calcification has been shown to lag that of males by about 10 years)
  • One or More of the Following Risk Factors:
  • Smoker - at least 5 pack years in the past 5 years (pack year = number of packs per day number of years of smoking)
  • Diabetic (Fasting glucose of \>125 mg/dL on two or more blood draws, or Random Blood Glucose of \>200 mg/dL on a single blood draw, or Hemoglobin A1C \>6.5%, or previous diagnosis of diabetes listed in the subject's medical record) or Pre-diabetic (Fasting glucose \>100 on two or more blood draws or Hgb A1C 5.7-6.4)
  • Hypertension (Systolic BP \> 140 or Diastolic BP \>90 or on blood pressure medications or diagnosis of hypertension in medical record)
  • Waist Circumference \> 40 inches for males or \>35 inches for females
  • Hyperlipidemia (LDL\>130, HDL\<40 for males, HDL \<50 for females, Triglycerides \>200, on lipid lowering medications and/or diagnosis of hyperlipidemia in medical record)

You may not qualify if:

  • Males \<35 years old
  • Women \<45 years old (please note the age difference is due to the fact that female plaque formation with calcification has been shown to lag that of males by about 10 years)
  • Officer Rank - officers are excluded as we are looking at the enlisted culture in the military.
  • History of any of the following:
  • Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
  • Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)
  • Myocardial Infarction (MI)
  • Percutaneous Intervention/Stent Placement (PCI)
  • Angina
  • Radiotherapy (external beam, brachytherapy, radiopharmaceutical)
  • Under the care of any of the following types of providers in the past 12 months (As these subjects are at greater risk of having had significant radiation exposure to the chest over the past 12 months):
  • Radiation/Medical Oncologist
  • Interventional Radiologist
  • Cardiologist
  • Cardiothoracic Surgeon
  • +3 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

David Grant USAF Medical Center

Travis Air Force Base, California, 94535, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

AtherosclerosisPlaque, Atherosclerotic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Limitations and Caveats

There were only 3 female participants; therefore, generalizations could not be made for this gender

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Elijah Burton
Organization
David Grant Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base

Study Officials

  • Elijah Burton, MD

    David Grant USAF Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Radiology Resident

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2013

First Posted

December 12, 2013

Study Start

November 5, 2013

Primary Completion

July 18, 2018

Study Completion

July 18, 2018

Last Updated

June 9, 2020

Results First Posted

June 9, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-05

Locations