Comparison of Pneumatic and Electromagnetic Muscle Vibrators to Stimulate Muscle Proprioceptors
Comparison of fMRI Compatible Pneumatic and Electromagnetic Muscle Vibrators to Stimulate Muscle Proprioceptors
Comparison of fMRI Compatible Pneumatic and Electromagnetic Muscle Vibrators to Stimulate Muscle Proprioceptors
Sponsor study identifier
observational
10
1 country
1
Study Start
November 2013
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
November 2014
Actual (reported)Study Completion
October 2015
Actual (reported)The purpose of this study is to determine the concurrent validity of a newly developed pneumatic, fMRI compatible muscle vibrator as compared to a electromagnetic muscle vibrator in the stimulation of muscle proprioceptors.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
October 2015
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
November 2013
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
December 5, 2013
Actual (reported)December 10, 2013
Actual (reported)November 2014
Actual (reported)October 2015
Actual (reported)Proprioceptive postural control
Center of pressure displacement on a force plate in standing in response to local muscle vibration on ankle and back muscles to specifically detect the role of proprioception in postural control.
6 months
Healthy persons, without non-specific low back pain
Young Flemish Volunteers
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
Claeys K, Brumagne S, Dankaerts W, Kiers H, Janssens L. Decreased variability in postural control strategies in young people with non-specific low back pain is associated with altered proprioceptive reweighting. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Jan;111(1):115-23. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1637-x. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
Simon Brumagne, Professor
KU Leuven
10 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
December 5, 2013
First Posted
December 10, 2013
Study Start
November 2013
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
November 2014
Actual (reported)Study Completion
October 2015
Actual (reported)Last Updated
October 16, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: