NCT02000180

Brief Summary

It is hypothesized that a progressive simulated learning strategy will result in better global clinical performance (e.g., technical, communication) and transfer of endoscopic skill, as compared with a high-fidelity simulation strategy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
37

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2013

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2013

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 17, 2013

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 4, 2013

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2014

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 19, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

February 19, 2018

Status Verified

August 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

November 17, 2013

Results QC Date

April 28, 2017

Last Update Submit

August 8, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference Between Progressive and High-Fidelity Groups on Clinical Colonoscopy Peformance (JAG/DOPS)

    The Joint Advisory Group (JAG) Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) tool is a tool to assess colonoscopic competency and includes ratings of the following domains: (i) assessment, consent and communication; (ii) safety and sedation; (iii) endoscopic skills during insertion and withdrawal; and, (iv) diagnostic and therapeutic ability. Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores representing higher colonoscopic competency. The tool will be used to assess participants before and after the intervention at a time of one week. A change in these ratings before and after intervention is the primary outcome.

    4-6 weeks post-intervention

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Cognitive Knowledge of Endoscopy

    Pre-training, immediate post-training

  • Colonoscopy Specific-performance.

    Pre-training, immediate post-training, and 4-6 weeks after training (delayed post-training)

  • Colonoscopy Specific Performance, Communication Skills, and Global Performance on an Integrated Scenario

    Immediate post-training and 4-6 weeks after training (delayed post-training)

Study Arms (2)

Progressive Group

EXPERIMENTAL

The progressive learning group will undertake 6 hours of interactive small-group didactic sessions, interlaced with up to 6 hours of self-directed instruction initially on the low-fidelity box simulator, with feedback provided one-on-one by an expert academic endoscopist. Participants in the progressive learning group can switch to the high-fidelity simulator at their discretion, but cannot return to the low-fidelity simulator. On the high fidelity VR simulator they can progress through six modules each in colonoscopy and endoscopic polypectomy in a self-directed fashion, with one-on-one feedback by an expert academic endoscopist. The endoscopy instructor will demonstrate techniques, answer questions and provide feedback. The entirety of this will be delivered over two days.

Behavioral: Progressive Group

High-Fidelity Group

NO INTERVENTION

The high-fidelity group will undertake 6 hours of interactive small-group didactic and hands-on sessions on the theory of colonoscopy, led by an expert academic gastroenterologist. The sessions will be interlaced with up to six hours of self-directed instruction on the high-fidelity VR simulator. Six task-specific modules of increasing difficulty in colonoscopy and colonoscopic polypectomy will be taught solely on the VR simulator with one-on-one feedback from an expert academic endoscopist. The endoscopy instructor will demonstrate techniques, answer questions and provide feedback as necessary. The entirety of this will be delivered over two days.

Interventions

Progressive Group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • novice endoscopists from Adult Gastroenterology, Pediatric Gastroenterology, General Surgery training programs at University of Toronto

You may not qualify if:

  • Trainees who have performed greater than 25 colonoscopies will be excluded to ensure all participants are novices.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

St. Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Grover SC, Scaffidi MA, Khan R, Garg A, Al-Mazroui A, Alomani T, Yu JJ, Plener IS, Al-Awamy M, Yong EL, Cino M, Ravindran NC, Zasowski M, Grantcharov TP, Walsh CM. Progressive learning in endoscopy simulation training improves clinical performance: a blinded randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Nov;86(5):881-889. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.1529. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Samir C. Grover
Organization
St. Michael's

Study Officials

  • Samir C Grover, MD/MEd

    Unity Health Toronto

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Staff Physician/Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2013

First Posted

December 4, 2013

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion

July 1, 2014

Study Completion

July 1, 2014

Last Updated

February 19, 2018

Results First Posted

February 19, 2018

Record last verified: 2017-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations