Surgical Treatment of High Perianal Fistulas
LIFTRAF
Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) Versus Rectal Advanced Mucosal Flap (RAF) in Surgical Treatment of High Perianal Fistulas
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Perianal fistula is a chronic phase of anorectal infection that occurs predominantly in the third and fourth decade of life. According to Parks classification fistulas have been divided into intersphincteric, transsphincteric, suprasphincteric and extrasphincteric. Simple fistulotomy can be performed with satisfactory outcomes in low fistula tracts but in high (transsphincteric) fistulas it may affect anal continence seriously. Therefore sphincter preserving procedures should be preferred in these cases. Rectal advancement mucosal flap (RAF) is one of the methods used in surgical fistula eradication with high success rate in cryptoglandular fistulas. However, this technique is technically demanding and results can be expert depended with wide spread of healing rates (24-100%) in individual studies as referred in recent systematic review. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) has been presented in 2007 as a simple sphincter preserving technique. The success rate varies between 40-95% with low overall incontinence rate (6%). The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of the LIFT and RAF procedure for treatment of high perianal fistulas.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 22, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 28, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedNovember 28, 2013
November 1, 2013
1.6 years
November 22, 2013
November 22, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recurrence rate
Fistula recurrence will be defined according to AGA (American Gastroenterological Association) criteria as a purulent secretion from external fistula opening followed the compression. Fistula recurrence will be confirmed by evaluation under anesthesia (followed by drainage).
One year
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Postoperative pain
14 days
Pre- and postoperative continence
One year
Postoperative morbidity
One month
Quality of life
One year
Study Arms (2)
Rectal advanced mucosal flap
ACTIVE COMPARATORProcedure will be performed in general anesthesia without mechanical bowel preparation. Antibiotic prophylaxis (Metronidazole 1g) will be applied intravenously 60 minutes prior the surgery. In RAF procedure, internal opening will identified and after infiltration with saline-adrenalin solution (1/100000) the mucosal flap will be mobilized proximally. The external tract and internal opening will be excised and the defect will be sutured. After that, the flap will be advanced from both sides with absorbable suture and overlapped over the internal opening. External openings will be left open.
Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract
ACTIVE COMPARATORProcedure will be performed in general anesthesia without mechanical bowel preparation. Antibiotic prophylaxis (Metronidazole 1g) will be applied intravenously 60 minutes prior the surgery. Before LIFT procedure the fistula tract will be identified with small probe. The intersphincteric space will be reached by dissection from small (2-4cm) incision. The fistula tract will be divided and ligated on both sides with Polydioxanone (PDS) suture. The external and internal openings will be left open to drain.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 18 years old or older
- Diagnosis of simple intersphincteric or transsphincteric fistula
- Patients able to comply with the study protocol as per investigator criteria
- Signed and dated informed consent by the patient
You may not qualify if:
- Recurrent anal fistula
- Suprasphincteric, low subcutaneous fistula
- Multiple fistulas
- Posttraumatic fistula
- Perianal hidradenitis
- Fistula arises from other than cryptoglandular origin
- Previous anal surgery except of abscess
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- History of fecal incontinence
- Rectal prolapse
- Malignant disease and life expectancy of less than 1 year, or chemotherapy and radiotherapy less than six months prior enrolment
- HIV infection
- Pregnancy
- Participation in another clinical trial less than one month prior to enrolment, or involvement in another trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Department of Surgery, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital
Hradec Králové, 50005, Czechia
Departement of Surgery, District Hospital
Nový Jičín, 74101, Czechia
Departement of Surgery, Military University Hospital
Prague, 16902, Czechia
Related Publications (10)
Marks CG, Ritchie JK. Anal fistulas at St Mark's Hospital. Br J Surg. 1977 Feb;64(2):84-91. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800640203.
PMID: 890252BACKGROUNDParks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg. 1976 Jan;63(1):1-12. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800630102.
PMID: 1267867BACKGROUNDMalik AI, Nelson RL. Surgical management of anal fistulae: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2008 Jun;10(5):420-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01483.x.
PMID: 18479308BACKGROUNDGarcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong DW, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD. Cutting seton versus two-stage seton fistulotomy in the surgical management of high anal fistula. Br J Surg. 1998 Feb;85(2):243-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.02877.x.
PMID: 9501826BACKGROUNDSoltani A, Kaiser AM. Endorectal advancement flap for cryptoglandular or Crohn's fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Apr;53(4):486-95. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181ce8b01.
PMID: 20305451BACKGROUNDRojanasakul A, Pattanaarun J, Sahakitrungruang C, Tantiphlachiva K. Total anal sphincter saving technique for fistula-in-ano; the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Mar;90(3):581-6.
PMID: 17427539BACKGROUNDYassin NA, Hammond TM, Lunniss PJ, Phillips RK. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract in the management of anal fistula. A systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2013 May;15(5):527-35. doi: 10.1111/codi.12224.
PMID: 23551996BACKGROUNDSandborn WJ, Fazio VW, Feagan BG, Hanauer SB; American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice Committee. AGA technical review on perianal Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 2003 Nov;125(5):1508-30. doi: 10.1016/j.gastro.2003.08.025. No abstract available.
PMID: 14598268BACKGROUNDJorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Jan;36(1):77-97. doi: 10.1007/BF02050307.
PMID: 8416784BACKGROUNDDindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
PMID: 15273542BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Július Örhalmi, MD
University Hospital Hradec Kralove
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zuzana Šerclová, MD
Central MIlitary Hospital Prague
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Karel Klos, MD
District Hospital Nový Jičín
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 22, 2013
First Posted
November 28, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
November 28, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-11