NCT01997645

Brief Summary

Perianal fistula is a chronic phase of anorectal infection that occurs predominantly in the third and fourth decade of life. According to Parks classification fistulas have been divided into intersphincteric, transsphincteric, suprasphincteric and extrasphincteric. Simple fistulotomy can be performed with satisfactory outcomes in low fistula tracts but in high (transsphincteric) fistulas it may affect anal continence seriously. Therefore sphincter preserving procedures should be preferred in these cases. Rectal advancement mucosal flap (RAF) is one of the methods used in surgical fistula eradication with high success rate in cryptoglandular fistulas. However, this technique is technically demanding and results can be expert depended with wide spread of healing rates (24-100%) in individual studies as referred in recent systematic review. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) has been presented in 2007 as a simple sphincter preserving technique. The success rate varies between 40-95% with low overall incontinence rate (6%). The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of the LIFT and RAF procedure for treatment of high perianal fistulas.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
140

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2013

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 22, 2013

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 28, 2013

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

November 28, 2013

Status Verified

November 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

November 22, 2013

Last Update Submit

November 22, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Anal fistulaRectal fistulaIntersphincteric fistulaPerianal fistula

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Recurrence rate

    Fistula recurrence will be defined according to AGA (American Gastroenterological Association) criteria as a purulent secretion from external fistula opening followed the compression. Fistula recurrence will be confirmed by evaluation under anesthesia (followed by drainage).

    One year

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Postoperative pain

    14 days

  • Pre- and postoperative continence

    One year

  • Postoperative morbidity

    One month

  • Quality of life

    One year

Study Arms (2)

Rectal advanced mucosal flap

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Procedure will be performed in general anesthesia without mechanical bowel preparation. Antibiotic prophylaxis (Metronidazole 1g) will be applied intravenously 60 minutes prior the surgery. In RAF procedure, internal opening will identified and after infiltration with saline-adrenalin solution (1/100000) the mucosal flap will be mobilized proximally. The external tract and internal opening will be excised and the defect will be sutured. After that, the flap will be advanced from both sides with absorbable suture and overlapped over the internal opening. External openings will be left open.

Procedure: RAF

Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Procedure will be performed in general anesthesia without mechanical bowel preparation. Antibiotic prophylaxis (Metronidazole 1g) will be applied intravenously 60 minutes prior the surgery. Before LIFT procedure the fistula tract will be identified with small probe. The intersphincteric space will be reached by dissection from small (2-4cm) incision. The fistula tract will be divided and ligated on both sides with Polydioxanone (PDS) suture. The external and internal openings will be left open to drain.

Procedure: LIFT

Interventions

LIFTPROCEDURE
Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract
RAFPROCEDURE
Rectal advanced mucosal flap

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged 18 years old or older
  • Diagnosis of simple intersphincteric or transsphincteric fistula
  • Patients able to comply with the study protocol as per investigator criteria
  • Signed and dated informed consent by the patient

You may not qualify if:

  • Recurrent anal fistula
  • Suprasphincteric, low subcutaneous fistula
  • Multiple fistulas
  • Posttraumatic fistula
  • Perianal hidradenitis
  • Fistula arises from other than cryptoglandular origin
  • Previous anal surgery except of abscess
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • History of fecal incontinence
  • Rectal prolapse
  • Malignant disease and life expectancy of less than 1 year, or chemotherapy and radiotherapy less than six months prior enrolment
  • HIV infection
  • Pregnancy
  • Participation in another clinical trial less than one month prior to enrolment, or involvement in another trial

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Department of Surgery, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital

Hradec Králové, 50005, Czechia

RECRUITING

Departement of Surgery, District Hospital

Nový Jičín, 74101, Czechia

RECRUITING

Departement of Surgery, Military University Hospital

Prague, 16902, Czechia

RECRUITING

Related Publications (10)

  • Marks CG, Ritchie JK. Anal fistulas at St Mark's Hospital. Br J Surg. 1977 Feb;64(2):84-91. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800640203.

    PMID: 890252BACKGROUND
  • Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg. 1976 Jan;63(1):1-12. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800630102.

    PMID: 1267867BACKGROUND
  • Malik AI, Nelson RL. Surgical management of anal fistulae: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2008 Jun;10(5):420-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01483.x.

    PMID: 18479308BACKGROUND
  • Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong DW, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD. Cutting seton versus two-stage seton fistulotomy in the surgical management of high anal fistula. Br J Surg. 1998 Feb;85(2):243-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.02877.x.

    PMID: 9501826BACKGROUND
  • Soltani A, Kaiser AM. Endorectal advancement flap for cryptoglandular or Crohn's fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Apr;53(4):486-95. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181ce8b01.

    PMID: 20305451BACKGROUND
  • Rojanasakul A, Pattanaarun J, Sahakitrungruang C, Tantiphlachiva K. Total anal sphincter saving technique for fistula-in-ano; the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Mar;90(3):581-6.

    PMID: 17427539BACKGROUND
  • Yassin NA, Hammond TM, Lunniss PJ, Phillips RK. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract in the management of anal fistula. A systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2013 May;15(5):527-35. doi: 10.1111/codi.12224.

    PMID: 23551996BACKGROUND
  • Sandborn WJ, Fazio VW, Feagan BG, Hanauer SB; American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice Committee. AGA technical review on perianal Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 2003 Nov;125(5):1508-30. doi: 10.1016/j.gastro.2003.08.025. No abstract available.

    PMID: 14598268BACKGROUND
  • Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Jan;36(1):77-97. doi: 10.1007/BF02050307.

    PMID: 8416784BACKGROUND
  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

    PMID: 15273542BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rectal Fistula

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal FistulaDigestive System FistulaDigestive System DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesRectal DiseasesFistulaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Július Örhalmi, MD

    University Hospital Hradec Kralove

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Zuzana Šerclová, MD

    Central MIlitary Hospital Prague

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Karel Klos, MD

    District Hospital Nový Jičín

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Július Örhalmi, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2013

First Posted

November 28, 2013

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion

June 1, 2015

Last Updated

November 28, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-11

Locations