NCT01988220

Brief Summary

Background: It is estimated that 50%-85% of individuals post stroke demonstrate sensory deficits. Sensory impairments are often overlooked in the therapeutic setting, although they lead to slower motor recovery. Working hypothesis: The overall goal of this study is to examine the effectiveness of a sensory discrimination reeducation oriented therapeutic program to the lower limb of stroke patients with sensory impairments. We assume that subjects to both groups will make progress, which will be more significant in the experimental group. Methods: Study population and design: Sixty individuals with chronic sensory impairment following a stroke will be recruited. Patients will be randomly assigned to sensory retraining treatment or to sensory stimulation treatment. Treatment will consist of ten 45 minute long intervention sessions, carried out within a 6 weeks period, and a home exercise program. The person conducting the assessments will be blind to the treatment allocation of the subjects. Outcome measures: The efficacy of the intervention will be determined in relation to the International Classification of Functionality (ICF) developed by the World Health Organization and will include assessments at the three domains defined by this model: 1. Body structure and function - determined by measures of the sensory capacity of the lower more affected limb; 2. Activities - determined by measures of balance and gait; 3. Participation - determined by measures of well-being and social reintegration. Two new outcome measures, for ankle and knee position sense and for texture discrimination of the foot, will be developed within this study. Data reliability measures on healthy population, and test - retest measures in post stroke population with be collected. Intervention: The experimental group will be treated by a perception learning oriented protocol for sensory reeducation, to improve identification, localization and discrimination of sensory stimuli, including electrical stimulation, texture and hardness discrimination and position sense training. The control group will receive the same stimuli without the attentive learning and discriminating component. Importance: Scientific proof and focused recommendations for a potent therapeutic method for the post-stroke population, allowing them better participation and quality of life. Key words: Stroke, sensory impairment, perceptual learning, lower limb, clinical trial.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
64

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2014

Typical duration for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 5, 2013

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 20, 2013

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2014

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

May 3, 2018

Status Verified

May 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

November 5, 2013

Last Update Submit

May 2, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

strokesensory deficitsensory retrainingperceptual learninglower extremity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Timed Up and Go test

    Standing up from a chair, walking three meters, turning around and coming back to sitting. time is assessed.

    pre - up to a week before intervention, post - after 6 weeks, follow-up - 3 months after

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Von Frey monofilaments foot identification threshold

    screening - one week before pretest, pre - up to one week before intervention, post - 6 weeks after, follow-up - 3 months after

Study Arms (2)

sensory retraining

EXPERIMENTAL

sensory identification and discrimination training. using different attention and sensation modalities for sensory retraining

Other: sensory retraining

repeated exposure to sensory input

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Other: repeated sensory input

Interventions

Also known as: perceptual learning, sensory reeducation
sensory retraining

sensory stimulation without attentive learning focus

repeated exposure to sensory input

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • post stroke
  • at least 6 months after stroke
  • with sensory deficits in study's screening tests

You may not qualify if:

  • other neurologic condition
  • peripheral neuropathy
  • pacemaker
  • hemispatial neglect

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Physical therapy clinics Clalit Health services

Haifa District, Israel

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Ofek H, Alperin M, Knoll T, Livne D, Laufer Y. Explicit versus implicit lower extremity sensory retraining for post-stroke chronic sensory deficits: a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Jun;45(12):1962-1968. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2080288. Epub 2022 Jun 1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Mordechai Alperin, MD

    Clalit Health Services

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Hadas Ofek, PhD student

    University of Haifa

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Yocheved Laufer, Professor

    University of Haifa

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Uzi Milman, MD

    Clalit Health Services

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chair, Physical Therapy Department

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2013

First Posted

November 20, 2013

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion

November 1, 2017

Study Completion

December 1, 2017

Last Updated

May 3, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-05

Locations