Pragmatic Research eXamining Inpatient Symptoms
PRAXIS
Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Adjunct Acupuncture vs Usual Care Among Hospitalized Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
238
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Many hospitalized patients experience pain during their hospital stay, and less than half report adequate pain relief. Common treatments for pain include opioid medications, which have associated side effects and complications. Research has shown that acupuncture is effective for surgical, postoperative and cancer-related pain, nausea, and vomiting. More research is needed on the effectiveness of adding acupuncture to routine care for hospitalized patients. The objective of this study is to examine the effectiveness of acupuncture delivered in a "real-world" setting according to the principles of traditional Chinese medicine among hospitalized patients to manage pain and other symptoms. 250 hospitalized participants will be randomized in a 1 to 1 ratio to receive either 1) usual care or 2) usual care with acupuncture offered (125 in each group). The primary outcome measure will be change in daily pain intensity. Data on other symptoms, such as nausea, vomiting, anxiety, and depression, as well as functionality and quality of life will be collected in person, on a web-based survey, or via telephone follow-up. The aims of the study are to examine the effectiveness of acupuncture to manage pain and other symptoms among hospitalized patients; to evaluate the impact of acupuncture on patient satisfaction among hospitalized patients; and to estimate costs and cost-effectiveness of acupuncture among a subset of hospitalized patients. The investigators hypothesize that compared to hospitalized patients receiving usual care alone, hospitalized patients receiving acupuncture will have:
- 1.decreased pain severity
- 2.higher patient satisfaction
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Nov 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 5, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 20, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedJune 9, 2020
June 1, 2020
1.1 years
November 5, 2013
June 4, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Self-reported pain
Daily pain intensity will be measured on a 0-10 numeric rating scale. The APS Patient Outcome Questionnaire will also be administered each day to measure pain severity and relief; impact of pain on activity, sleep, and negative emotions; side effects of treatment; helpfulness of information about pain treatment; and ability to participate in pain treatment decisions.
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 6 days
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Self-reported nausea and vomiting
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 6 days
Self-reported anxiety and depression
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 6 days
Functionality and quality of life
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay and for several days after hospital discharge, an expected total average of 9 days
Patient satisfaction
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay and for several days after hospital discharge, an expected total average of 9 days
Self-reported global well-being
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 6 days
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (6)
Hospital costs and charges
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 6 days
Use of medications
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 6 days
Time to ambulation
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 6 days
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Usual care
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants will receive usual care in the hospital.
Usual care with acupuncture
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive usual care with acupuncture treatments up to four days per week for the duration of their hospital stay.
Interventions
Acupuncture treatments will be provided in patient rooms up to four days per week for the duration of their hospital stay. Treatments will be consistent with how acupuncture is typically practiced: acupuncturists will diagnosis patients according to principles of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM); and treatments will be individualized to the patients. Duration of assessment, needle placement and retention will be 20-30 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English or Spanish speaking
- Admitted to Mt Zion Hospital for a minimum anticipated length of stay for at least 4 days
- Aged 18 or older
- In a ward included in the roll out of the Osher Center's acupuncture program at Mt Zion
You may not qualify if:
- Unstable medical condition (e.g., severe pulmonary disease, myocardial infarction, severe depression, patients in the intensive care unit)
- Acupuncture contraindication (e.g., sepsis, endocarditis)
- Inability to consent or complete surveys (e.g., cognitive or communication impairment)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UCSF Medical Center at Mount Zion
San Francisco, California, 94115, United States
Related Publications (9)
Dix P, Sandhar B, Murdoch J, MacIntyre PA. Pain on medical wards in a district general hospital. Br J Anaesth. 2004 Feb;92(2):235-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh052.
PMID: 14722175BACKGROUNDApfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):534-540. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000068822.10113.9E.
PMID: 12873949BACKGROUNDConway Morris A, Howie N. Pain in medical inpatients: an under-recognised problem? J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2009 Dec;39(4):292-5. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2009.401.
PMID: 21152463BACKGROUNDWhelan CT, Jin L, Meltzer D. Pain and satisfaction with pain control in hospitalized medical patients: no such thing as low risk. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jan 26;164(2):175-80. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.2.175.
PMID: 14744841BACKGROUNDBenyamin R, Trescot AM, Datta S, Buenaventura R, Adlaka R, Sehgal N, Glaser SE, Vallejo R. Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician. 2008 Mar;11(2 Suppl):S105-20.
PMID: 18443635BACKGROUNDSun Y, Gan TJ, Dubose JW, Habib AS. Acupuncture and related techniques for postoperative pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Aug;101(2):151-60. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen146. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
PMID: 18522936BACKGROUNDEzzo JM, Richardson MA, Vickers A, Allen C, Dibble SL, Issell BF, Lao L, Pearl M, Ramirez G, Roscoe J, Shen J, Shivnan JC, Streitberger K, Treish I, Zhang G. Acupuncture-point stimulation for chemotherapy-induced nausea or vomiting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD002285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002285.pub2.
PMID: 16625560BACKGROUNDLee A, Fan LT. Stimulation of the wrist acupuncture point P6 for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003281.pub3.
PMID: 19370583BACKGROUNDChao MT, Chang A, Reddy S, Harrison JD, Acquah J, Toveg M, Santana T, Hecht FM. Adjunctive acupuncture for pain and symptom management in the inpatient setting: protocol for a pilot hybrid effectiveness-implementation study. J Integr Med. 2016 May;14(3):228-38. doi: 10.1016/S2095-4964(16)60252-2.
PMID: 27181130DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maria T Chao, DrPH, MPA
University of California, San Francisco
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 5, 2013
First Posted
November 20, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
June 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06