CAndesartan vs LIsinopril Effects on the BRain
CALIBREX
2 other identifiers
interventional
176
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to conduct a 1-year double blind randomized control trial comparing candesartan to lisinopril in 140 individuals with hypertension and executive mild cognitive impairment in their effects on executive function, neuroimaging markers, and vascular indicators.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 hypertension
Started Aug 2014
Longer than P75 for phase_2 hypertension
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 27, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 14, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 20, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 3, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 3, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 21, 2021
CompletedFebruary 21, 2021
February 1, 2021
4.3 years
October 27, 2013
December 14, 2020
February 2, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Executive Function
Executive function will be assessed using Trail Making Test (part B-A). Part A was collected to correct for motor speed and visual-perceptual demands on TMT by subtracting completion time for TMT Part A from completion time for Part B (TMT B - A). TMT Part B-A provides a relatively purer measure of executive functioning. It has a timed scale from 0 sec (min) to 300 secs (max). Along this scale, a lower score is better.
12 months
NINDS-initiated EXecutive Abilities: Measures and Instruments for Neurobehavioral Evaluation and Research or "EXAMINER" Tool Box.
EXecutive Abilities: Measures and Instruments for Neurobehavioral Evaluation and Research or "EXAMINER" tool box. This test batteryThe battery includes 11 tasks that generate 15 primary variables. Within this set, the EXAMINER includes: working memory, inhibition, set shifting, and fluency. The parts of EXAMINER that were used for this study include: Flanker task (inhibition) which involves responding to a central stimulus while ignoring flanking stimuli that are either compatible or incompatible with the central stimulus; Set-shifting, a measure of mental flexibility; Spatial 1-Back test assesses spatial working memory; Dot Counting test assesses verbal working memory; Verbal Fluency tested using a List Generation test which require the participant to generate words beginning with a specific letter, and category fluency in which the participant generates words from a specified category (e.g., animals, fruits). Higher are reflective of better executive function (-1 to +1)
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Memory
12 months
Language
12 months
Attention Measured Using Digit Span Backward
12 months
White Matter Lesion Volume
12 months
Cerebral Perfusion
12 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Candesartan
ACTIVE COMPARATORTo achieve blood pressure control, we will use a stepwise protocol as follows: candesartan (blinded) 8mg→ 16mg→ 32mg. Both groups will also receive (unblinded) , if needed to achieve blood pressure control, HCTZ 12.5mg→ 25mg, Amlodipine 2.5mg→ 5mg →10mg and metoprolol succinate extended release 12.5mg→ 25mg→ 50mg. Antihypertensive medications will be increased every 2 weeks until control is achieved.
Lisinopril
ACTIVE COMPARATORTo achieve blood pressure control we will use a stepwise protocol as follows: lisinopril (blinded) 10mg→ 20mg→ 40mg. Both groups will also receive (unblinded), if needed to achieve blood pressure control, HCTZ 12.5mg→ 25mg, Amlodipine 2.5mg→ 5mg→ 10mg and metoprolol succinate extended release 12.5mg→ 25mg→ 50mg. Antihypertensive medications will be increased every 2 weeks until control is achieved.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age: 55 years or older;
- Hypertension: SBP≥140 mm Hg or DBP≥ 90 mm or receiving antihypertensive medications.
- Executive MCI will be defined using these criteria:
- The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score less than or equal to 26
- Executive dysfunction: A performance at the 10th percentile or below on at least one of four screening tests for executive function: Trail Making Test, Part B (TMT-B), modified Stroop interference, Digit Span and Digit Sequencing, and Letter fluency.
- Minimal Functional limitation as reflected by the Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ)≤7
You may not qualify if:
- Intolerance to study drugs;
- SBP \>200 or DBP \>110 mm Hg;
- Renal disease or hyperkalemia
- Active medical or psychiatric problems
- Uncontrolled congestive heart failure;
- History of stroke in the past 3 years;
- Inability to perform the study procedures
- Women of childbearing potential
- diagnosis of dementia
- In those who lack decision capacity, a study surrogate who can sign on their behalf will be required. Since we are enrolling only those with MCI, we anticipate that most participants will have decision capacity
- Current use of Lithium, as most antihypertensive classes may lead to increased lithium toxic levels.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Emory Universitylead
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Emory Univeristy
Atlanta, Georgia, 30329, United States
Related Publications (1)
Hajjar I, Okafor M, McDaniel D, Obideen M, Dee E, Shokouhi M, Quyyumi AA, Levey A, Goldstein F. Effects of Candesartan vs Lisinopril on Neurocognitive Function in Older Adults With Executive Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2012252. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12252.
PMID: 32761160DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
A limitation of this study is its 1-year study period. Additional limitations include the relatively small sample size, which limited our power to correct for multiple comparisons.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Hajjar
- Organization
- Emory University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ihab Hajjar, MD, MS
Emory Univeristy
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 27, 2013
First Posted
November 14, 2013
Study Start
August 20, 2014
Primary Completion
December 3, 2018
Study Completion
December 3, 2018
Last Updated
February 21, 2021
Results First Posted
February 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02