Influence of the Method of Alleviation of Aorto-Caval Compression on the Trans-Hepatic Ultrasound-Assessed Inferior Vena Cava Diameter In Pregnant Patients
1 other identifier
observational
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cardiac arrest during pregnancy is rare but may result in poor maternal and fetal outcome. Because of its rare occurrence and ethical issues this topic is not very well studied and many questions pertaining to maternal resuscitation remain unanswered. One of the challenging aspects of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a term pregnant patient is the ideal positioning during chest compressions. International societies have made recommendations regarding management of pregnant patients during cardiac arrest. They advocate the use of left lateral position with 30 degrees tilt or manual uterine displacement. However these recommendations are not based on high level of evidence. Ultrasound has been used to visualize the change in diameter of great vessels to determine the volume status or adequacy of blood circulation of these patients. This approach can be used to study the adequacy of blood circulation of pregnant patients in different positions. The objective of this study is to compare the change in Inferior vena cava diameter obtained with pregnant women in either the left lateral tilt or in the supine position with a manual uterine displacement, compared to the left lateral position and the supine position. Our hypothesis is that the inferior vena cava diameter obtained in the supine position with manual left uterine displacement would be larger as compared to that obtained with women positioned with a 30-degree tilt.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Nov 2013
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 6, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 13, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedJune 4, 2014
June 1, 2014
1 month
November 6, 2013
June 3, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
IVC maximum diameter
The IVC maximum diameter in each position (measured during expiration).
20 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Fetal Heart Rate
20 minutes
Maternal vitals
20 minutes
IVC minimum diameter
20 minutes
IVC Index
20 minutes
Study Arms (1)
Term pregnant patients
ASA I-II term (36-40 weeks) non-laboring women with singleton pregnancies who are admitted at MSH for induction of labor, elective cesarean section or for observation for any medical reason. These patients will be examined in 4 positions with the ultrasound.
Interventions
The IVC will be visualized and images obtained using the intercostal window in both longitudinal and transverse planes.
Eligibility Criteria
Non-laboring, term prengnant women with singleton pregnancies who are admitted at Mount Sinai Hospital for induction of labor, elective cesarean section or for observation for any medical reason.
You may qualify if:
- ASA I or II
- Term pregnancy (36-40 weeks)
- Singleton pregnancy
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with known cardiac disease, severe preeclampsia on medication
- Multiple gestation
- Breech presentation
- Patients unable to comply with the 4 positions (left lateral, left tilt, supine and supine with manual displacement)
- Patients unable or unwilling to consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G1X5, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 6, 2013
First Posted
November 13, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
June 4, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-06