Outcomes After Centrifugation Versus PureGraft for Fatgrafting to the Breast
2 other identifiers
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Breast-conserving treatment (BCT) leads to a progressive and deteriorating breast deformity. Fatgrafting is ideal for breast reconstruction after BCT. The most frequently utilized technique for fat processing is centrifugation. The PureGraft device (Cytori Therapeutics, USA) is a new method that involves washing and filtering the fat to prepare the graft. The investigators compared the subjective and objective outcomes of two fat-processing methods, centrifugation and PureGraft filtration. Thirty patients underwent breast reconstruction performed by a single surgeon (OM) after BCT in our department between April 2011 and September 2012. The patients were preoperatively divided into two groups randomly: 15 received fatgrafts processed by centrifugation, and 15 received fatgrafts processed by washing in PureGraft bags. The patients were followed up for 12-30 months.To measure the subjective outcome, the investigators distributed the BREAST-Q questionnaire to all the patients both preoperatively and one year postoperatively. The BCCT.core software evaluated the objective outcome of breast reconstruction by fatgrafting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2011
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 28, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 8, 2013
CompletedNovember 8, 2013
November 1, 2013
2.3 years
October 28, 2013
November 7, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Outcomes after centrifugation versus PureGraft for fatgrafting to the breast after breast-conserving therapy
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Centrifugation
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients recieved fatgraft processed by Centrifugation
Puregraft
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients recieved fatgraft processed by Puregraft
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- State after breast conserving therapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bulovka Hospitallead
Study Sites (1)
Bulovka Hospital
Prague, 180 00, Czechia
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ondrej Mestak, M.D.
Charles University, Czech Republic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 28, 2013
First Posted
November 8, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2011
Primary Completion
August 1, 2013
Study Completion
September 1, 2013
Last Updated
November 8, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-11