NCT01975623

Brief Summary

VATS anatomical lung resection provides an effective minimally invasive treatment strategy for stage I and II lung cancer. VATS lobectomy is associated with significantly less postoperative atrial fibrillation, blood transfusion, renal failure, and other complications when compared with lobectomy via thoracotomy. Although VATS lobectomy has been proven to be effective and safe in experienced hands, it is not devoid of risk. Intra-operative surgical complications can be at times catastrophic. Currently, in spite of being a safe and effective technique in experienced hands, a minority of anatomical pulmonary resections are being performed by VATS. The technical difficulty and increased actual and perceived danger of VATS lobectomy is related to PA branch manipulation and this is the main limitation for many thoracic surgeons regarding the adoption of VATS lobectomy into their practise. Furthermore, the majority of VATS lobectomies are being performed in high volume, academic medical centers with a resultant disparity in socioeconomic status between those that undergo VATS versus open lobectomy. If we can find a way to decrease the manipulation required by the surgeon on the PA branches, these procedures will be safer, less stressful for the surgeon and therefore more prevalent for anatomical pulmonary resections.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
47

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable lung-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2013

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2013

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 29, 2013

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 4, 2013

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2014

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

November 26, 2015

Status Verified

May 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

October 29, 2013

Last Update Submit

November 24, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Primary outcome for analysis will be the intergroupe comparison of mean PA burst pressures.

    Intergroup differences will be compared with the student's t-test with bursting pressures entered as a continuous variable. Statistical testing for normality of data will be performed and when data is non-normal, non-parametric methods (ex: Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test…) will be used. Multivariable linear regression models will be employed in order to compare burst pressures between groups controlling for potential confounders (disease state, size of vessel sealed, age of patient, sex, pulmonary lobe, laterality, immunosupression, diabetes, vascular disease…).

    5 months

Study Arms (1)

Intervention Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Pulmonary artery Energy Sealing with HARMONIC ACE+ Shears (HS) ex-vivo

Device: HARMONIC ACE®+ Shears (HS)

Interventions

We plan to evaluate the efficacy of the HS for the sealing of PAs in an ex-vivo human model. Efficacy will be measured and compared using the bursting pressure point following vascular energy sealing. Energy sealing may be superior to stapling devices as it eliminates the need for excessive tissue dissection around the pulmonary vessels, which in turn decrease the incidence of vascular injuries during VATS anatomical lung resection. All vessels will be sealed ex-vivo using the HARMONIC ACE®+ Shears (Ethicon, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA).

Intervention Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients with non-hilar tumours undergoing anatomical pulmonary lung resection by either VATS or open thoracotomy,
  • patients undergoing lung explant prior to lung transplantation and
  • patients undergoing multiple visceral organ retrieval in which the lungs are not suitable for transplant.

You may not qualify if:

  • inability to consent (patient or family member in case of recipient organ),
  • patient \< 18 years old,
  • patients with hilar tumours in proximity to major PAs that might affect the integrity of the pathological vascular margin.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal

Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lung Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract NeoplasmsThoracic NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Officials

  • Moishe Liberman, MD, PhD

    Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2013

First Posted

November 4, 2013

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion

December 1, 2014

Study Completion

April 1, 2015

Last Updated

November 26, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-05

Locations