NCT01011595

Brief Summary

The gold standard techniques to assess the extent of disease and decide on therapy for patients with lung cancer consists of cervical mediastinoscopy, which is a surgical procedure which entails an incision in the neck and the removal of lymph nodes from around the airway. Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) are new, non-surgical techniques that have been available for the past several years and are proving invaluable in lung cancer evaluation. These techniques are minimally invasive and can be performed without surgery. To date, there have been no head-to-head studies on the same group of patients using both the old and new techniques. The study will consist of a study which compares traditional staging techniques in lung cancer patients to new, less invasive techniques. The significance of the proposed project is tremendous. If the new strategies prove to be equivalent (or superior) to traditional techniques, these techniques will be considered the new gold-standard tests. This will change the way lung cancer is evaluated. An equivalent or superior result will also significantly impact on patient care, cost and morbidity due to the speed, convenience and lack of operating room requirement as well as the lack of general anesthesia.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
166

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable lung-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2009

Typical duration for not_applicable lung-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2009

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 9, 2009

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 11, 2009

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

June 21, 2012

Status Verified

June 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

November 9, 2009

Last Update Submit

June 20, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

lung cancermediastinoscopymediastinal lymph nodesstagingEBUSEUSEndobronchial UltrasoundEndoscopic Ultrasound

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The primary outcome measure will be the accuracy of the combination of minimally invasive diagnostic tests to correctly diagnose the presence or absence of mediastinal lymph node metastases compared to mediastinoscopy.

    Define and compare the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, likelihood ratio and accuriacies between traditional and minimally invasive mediastinal diagnostic and staging techniques for lung cancer.

    3-6 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • The safety of all diagnostic techniques will be evaluated and compared between techniques.

    3-6 months

  • Procedure-related morbidity

    3-6 months

  • Procedural, hopsitalization and overall cost

    termination of enrollment

  • Clinical decision making realted to diagnostic technique results.

    termination of enrollment

Interventions

Surgical Meciastinal Lymph Node Staging

Also known as: conventional staging procedure

Minimally Invasive Echo-Bronchoscopic Lymph Node Evaluation and Biopsy

Also known as: Minimally invasive mediastinal staging

Minimally Invasive Echo-Endoscopic Lymph Node Evaluation and Biopsy

Also known as: Minimally invasive mediastinal staging

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Lung lesion with mediastinal lymphadenopathy\* and/or positive PET scan in the mediastinum
  • Lung lesion (\>1cm) without mediastinal lymphadenopathy\* or positive PET scan in the mediastinum

You may not qualify if:

  • Age \< 18 years old
  • CT or PET positivity in an extra-thoracic site (adrenal, liver, brain, bone…)
  • Indeterminate pulmonary nodule less than 1cm in diameter without mediastinal lymphadenopathy\* on CT and a negative PET scan
  • History of previous mediastinoscopy
  • Biopsy proven positive mediastinal LN(s)
  • Inability to consent for the study
  • Cervical or thoracic anatomy precluding mediastinoscopy
  • Inability to tolerate general anesthesia
  • Pre-operative plan for carinal resection or carinal pneumonectomy (CM contraindicated prior to operative procedure due to additional difficulty secondary to scarring at time of resection)
  • Active pulmonary infection (bronchitis, pneumonia)
  • Active cutaneous infection overlying proposed surgical site(s)
  • Lymphadenopathy will be defined as short axis LN diameter of \>10 mm on CT scan

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal

Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1, Canada

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Liberman M, Sampalis J, Duranceau A, Thiffault V, Hadjeres R, Ferraro P. Endosonographic mediastinal lymph node staging of lung cancer. Chest. 2014 Aug;146(2):389-397. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2349.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lung Neoplasms

Interventions

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract NeoplasmsThoracic NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Biopsy, Fine-NeedleBiopsy, NeedleBiopsyCytodiagnosisCytological TechniquesClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisImage-Guided BiopsySpecimen HandlingUltrasonography, InterventionalUltrasonographyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques, SurgicalSurgical Procedures, OperativeMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Moishe Liberman, MD, PhD

    Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 9, 2009

First Posted

November 11, 2009

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion

April 1, 2012

Study Completion

June 1, 2012

Last Updated

June 21, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-06

Locations