Minimally Invasive, Diagnosis and Staging of Lung Cancer
Minimally Invasive, Trans-Luminal Diagnosis and Staging of Lung Cancer: A Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison With Traditional Gold Standard Diagnostic Techniques
1 other identifier
interventional
166
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The gold standard techniques to assess the extent of disease and decide on therapy for patients with lung cancer consists of cervical mediastinoscopy, which is a surgical procedure which entails an incision in the neck and the removal of lymph nodes from around the airway. Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) are new, non-surgical techniques that have been available for the past several years and are proving invaluable in lung cancer evaluation. These techniques are minimally invasive and can be performed without surgery. To date, there have been no head-to-head studies on the same group of patients using both the old and new techniques. The study will consist of a study which compares traditional staging techniques in lung cancer patients to new, less invasive techniques. The significance of the proposed project is tremendous. If the new strategies prove to be equivalent (or superior) to traditional techniques, these techniques will be considered the new gold-standard tests. This will change the way lung cancer is evaluated. An equivalent or superior result will also significantly impact on patient care, cost and morbidity due to the speed, convenience and lack of operating room requirement as well as the lack of general anesthesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable lung-cancer
Started Oct 2009
Typical duration for not_applicable lung-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 9, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 11, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2012
CompletedJune 21, 2012
June 1, 2012
2.5 years
November 9, 2009
June 20, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcome measure will be the accuracy of the combination of minimally invasive diagnostic tests to correctly diagnose the presence or absence of mediastinal lymph node metastases compared to mediastinoscopy.
Define and compare the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, likelihood ratio and accuriacies between traditional and minimally invasive mediastinal diagnostic and staging techniques for lung cancer.
3-6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
The safety of all diagnostic techniques will be evaluated and compared between techniques.
3-6 months
Procedure-related morbidity
3-6 months
Procedural, hopsitalization and overall cost
termination of enrollment
Clinical decision making realted to diagnostic technique results.
termination of enrollment
Interventions
Surgical Meciastinal Lymph Node Staging
Minimally Invasive Echo-Bronchoscopic Lymph Node Evaluation and Biopsy
Minimally Invasive Echo-Endoscopic Lymph Node Evaluation and Biopsy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Lung lesion with mediastinal lymphadenopathy\* and/or positive PET scan in the mediastinum
- Lung lesion (\>1cm) without mediastinal lymphadenopathy\* or positive PET scan in the mediastinum
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18 years old
- CT or PET positivity in an extra-thoracic site (adrenal, liver, brain, bone…)
- Indeterminate pulmonary nodule less than 1cm in diameter without mediastinal lymphadenopathy\* on CT and a negative PET scan
- History of previous mediastinoscopy
- Biopsy proven positive mediastinal LN(s)
- Inability to consent for the study
- Cervical or thoracic anatomy precluding mediastinoscopy
- Inability to tolerate general anesthesia
- Pre-operative plan for carinal resection or carinal pneumonectomy (CM contraindicated prior to operative procedure due to additional difficulty secondary to scarring at time of resection)
- Active pulmonary infection (bronchitis, pneumonia)
- Active cutaneous infection overlying proposed surgical site(s)
- Lymphadenopathy will be defined as short axis LN diameter of \>10 mm on CT scan
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Liberman M, Sampalis J, Duranceau A, Thiffault V, Hadjeres R, Ferraro P. Endosonographic mediastinal lymph node staging of lung cancer. Chest. 2014 Aug;146(2):389-397. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2349.
PMID: 24603902DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Moishe Liberman, MD, PhD
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 9, 2009
First Posted
November 11, 2009
Study Start
October 1, 2009
Primary Completion
April 1, 2012
Study Completion
June 1, 2012
Last Updated
June 21, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-06