Comparative Study of Rituximab Versus Combination of Rituximab and Intravenous Cyclophosphamide in Severe Pemphigus
A PILOT STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFICACY OF RITUXIMAB VERSUS COMBINATION OF RITUXIMAB AND INTRAVENOUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE IN THE TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY PEMPHIGUS
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of rituximab alone vs combination of rituximab and cyclophosphamide in the treatment of pemphigus not responding adequately to routine medications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Nov 2013
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 4, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2015
CompletedOctober 30, 2014
October 1, 2014
1.6 years
October 4, 2013
October 29, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Study the clinical efficacy of IV rituximab vs IV rituximab and IV cyclophosphamide combination for treatment of refractory pemphigus in terms of early and late end points as defined by the international pemphigus committee
Primary outcome measures being 1. Time taken for control of disease activity 2. Time taken for achievement of partial remission 3. Time taken for achievement of complete remission
upto 9 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Study the characteristics of B cell depletion and repopulation following IV rituximab and combination of IV cyclophosphamide with IV rituximab.
upto 9 months
Other Outcomes (2)
To study the difference in relapse rate
upto 9 months
to study the total cumulative dose of corticosteroids adminstered and adjuvants required among patients of the 2 treatment groups
upto 9 months
Study Arms (2)
Rituximab
ACTIVE COMPARATORInj Rituximab 1 gram IV given on day 0 and day 15
Combination of Rituximab and Cyclophosphamide IV
ACTIVE COMPARATORIV Rituximab 1gram on day 0 and 15 750 mg IV cyclophosphamide in 250 ml of NS over 2-3 hr on day 1 and day 16
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with the diagnosis of pemphigus based on clinical, histopathological and immunological features the following:
- Refractory disease defined as continuing extension of old lesions, development of new lesion, or failure of established lesions to begin to heal despite 3 weeks of therapy on 1.5 mg/kg/day of prednisolone or its equivalent with or without the concurrent use of cyclophosphamide 2mg/kg/day for 12 weeks or azathioprine 2.5 mg/kg/day for 12 weeks. Patients who fail to respond to 6 DCP/DP are also considered as refractory disease.
You may not qualify if:
- Infections- Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, HIV, active tuberculosis or sepsis.
- Abnormal liver function tests and renal function tests
- Known cardiac arrhythmia or conduction abnormality
- Systolic ejection fraction \<40%
- Pregnancy and breast feeding
- Severely decreased bone marrow functions.
- Known history of bladder cancer or hemorrhagic cystitis
- Known allergy to cyclophosphamide
- Patients of reproductive age group who haven't completed their family
- Known hypersensitivity to murine proteins.
- Patients who do not consent for the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
PGIMER
Chandigarh, Chandigarh, 160012, India
Post-graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
Chandigarh, Chandigarh, 160012, India
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shraddha Uprety, MBBS
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- UNKNOWN
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Junior Resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 4, 2013
First Posted
November 1, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 30, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-10