Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon Angioplasty With Provisional Use of Nitinol Stent Versus Systematic Implantation of Paclitaxel-eluting Stent for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal de Novo Lesions
1 other identifier
interventional
250
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To determine in patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions whether percutaneous revascularization with paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty (PEB) and provisional nitinol stent is superior with respect to the 12-month incidence of restenosis compared to treatment with systematic paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) angioplasty
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 25, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2015
CompletedOctober 25, 2013
October 1, 2013
2 years
October 21, 2013
October 21, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
angiographic binary restenosis
incidence of binary restenosis
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Composite of all cause mortality, major amputation and target lesion revascularization.
12 months
Study Arms (2)
PEB
ACTIVE COMPARATORPEB angioplasty plus provisional nitinol stent implantation
PES
EXPERIMENTALSystematic PES angioplasty
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia
- de novo stenosis ≥ 50% or occlusion of at least 40 mm in length located in femoropopliteal arteries
- presence of a clear healthy segment between the lesion in superficial femoral and common femoral artery and between popliteal and tibioperoneal trunk
- presence of at least 1 patent tibial vessel with distal run-off (below-the-knee artery was considered patent if free from obstructive lesions determining angiographic stenosis \>70%)
You may not qualify if:
- life expectancy \<1 year
- contraindication for combined antiplatelet therapy or known allergy to nickel or paclitaxel
- need for major amputation (MA) at the time of enrolment
- Failure to recanalize intended below-the-knee arteries in CLI patients at risk of major amputation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cardiovascular Department, Ospedale S.Donato
Arezzo, AR, 52100, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Liistro F, Angioli P, Porto I, Ducci K, Falsini G, Ventoruzzo G, Ricci L, Scatena A, Grotti S, Bolognese L. Drug-Eluting Balloon Versus Drug-Eluting Stent for Complex Femoropopliteal Arterial Lesions: The DRASTICO Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jul 16;74(2):205-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.057.
PMID: 31296293DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2013
First Posted
October 25, 2013
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
October 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 25, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-10