NCT01658540

Brief Summary

The primary purpose of this study is to assess safety and efficacy of the Drug Eluting Balloon (DEB) technology for the treatment of the Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA) ischemic obstructive vascular disease in patients presenting with long lesions. As secondary aim this study is going to explore treatment effect on a number of procedural and clinical endpoints in order to collect information to design a future comparative effectiveness study.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
105

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2012

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

6 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 31, 2012

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 7, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2012

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2015

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

October 3, 2016

Status Verified

September 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

July 31, 2012

Last Update Submit

September 30, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Drug Eluting Balloon (DEB) technologylong SFA lesions disease

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • rate of primary patency

    Primary patency is defined as freedom from the combined endpoints of clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) and \>50% restenosis in the treated lesion. Clinically driven TLR is defined as any re-intervention within the target lesion due to symptoms or drop of ABI of ≥20% or \>0.15 when compared to post-procedure. Restenosis \> 50% is defined by a peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) \> 2.4.

    within the first 12 months after percutaneous treatment

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • composite of all Major Adverse Events (MAE)

    within the first 24 months after percutaneous treatment

  • incidence of Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular event (MACCE)

    within the first 24 months after percutaneous treatment

  • clinical improvement as assessed by Rutherford Class changes

    within 6, 12 and 24 months vs baseline

Other Outcomes (3)

  • rate of instrumental restenosis

    within the first 24 months after percutaneous treatment

  • procedural success rate

    at the end of percutaneous treatment

  • walking capacity and quality of life

    whithin 6, 12 and 24 months post-procedure vs. baseline

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients affected by lower extremities artery disease (LEAD) and referred to the participating centres for the endovascular treatment of de novo or restenotic lesions (no in stent restenosis) in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries will be considered for the study

You may qualify if:

  • Documented ischemic, symptomatic arterial disease in the femoral-popliteal arteries according to Rutherford Category 2, 3 or 4;
  • Target lesion consists of a single solitary or multiple adjacent de novo or restenotic lesions (non-in-stent) with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by visual estimate and cumulative lesion length ≥ 15 cm;
  • Target vessel is the superficial femoral artery and/or proximal popliteal artery (above the knee);
  • Life expectancy \>1 year in the Investigator's opinion;
  • Written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient unwilling or unlikely to comply with FU schedule;
  • Administration of local or systemic thrombolytic therapy within 48 hours prior to the index procedure;
  • Known allergies or sensitivities to heparin, aspirin, other anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapies, and/or paclitaxel;
  • Additional planned cardiac or peripheral percutaneous or surgical intervention including CABG within 30 days following the study procedure;
  • cm long inflow lesion (≥50% DS) or occlusion (any length) in the ipsilateral Iliac artery;
  • Failure to successfully treat \< 15 cm long inflow lesion in the ipsilateral Iliac artery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (6)

Anthea Hospital

Bari, Bari, 70124, Italy

Location

Maria Cecilia Hospital

Cotignola, Ravenna, 48010, Italy

Location

Città di Lecce Hospital

Lecce, 73100, Italy

Location

Maria Eleonora Hospital, GVM Care & Research

Palermo, 90141, Italy

Location

ICLAS Rapallo

Rapallo, Italy

Location

Maria Pia Hospital

Torino, Italy

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Micari A, Vadala G, Castriota F, Liso A, Grattoni C, Russo P, Marchese A, Pantaleo P, Roscitano G, Cesana BM, Cremonesi A. 1-Year Results of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for Long Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: Evidence From the SFA-Long Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May 9;9(9):950-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.02.014.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Arterial Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AtherosclerosisArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPeripheral Vascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Antonio Micari, MD

    Maria Eleonora Hospital, GVM Care & Research

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2012

First Posted

August 7, 2012

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion

May 1, 2015

Study Completion

May 1, 2016

Last Updated

October 3, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations