NCT01969448

Brief Summary

The investigators hypothesize that nipple-areola skin sparing mastectomy (NASSM) performed through an inframammary incision has a superior blood supply relative to a lateral oblique incision. Moreover, by minimizing complications and optimizing aesthetic outcomes, the investigators believe it will be associated with significantly higher patient reported outcome scores. The addition of information gained by use of intraoperative laser-assisted fluorescent angiography (measured with the Spy Elite imaging device) will reduce complication rates by directing intraoperative resection of ischemic tissue and limiting the volume of immediate implant placement in instances where real time imaging would suggest compromised perfusion. These quantifiable, objective measures will justify the use of NASSM and immediate implant placement coupled with intraoperative laser-assisted fluorescent angiography in prosthetic based breast reconstruction despite longer operative times.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
79

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 28, 2013

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 14, 2013

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 25, 2013

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 27, 2016

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 17, 2017

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 18, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

April 18, 2018

Status Verified

March 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

October 14, 2013

Results QC Date

January 11, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 20, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Nipple-areola skin sparing mastectomyImmediate reconstructionProphylactic MastectomyBreast-QBreast CancerDuctal Carcinoma in Situ - Category

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Percentage of Original Preoperative Blood Supply (Perfusion) Post Nipple Sparing Mastectomy

    * Laser-assisted fluorescent angiography via the Spy Elite imaging device will be utilized to capture this data during mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Standard postoperative patient follow up will assess for perfusion. * The Spy device quantifies perfusion by measuring relative fluorescence of indocyanine green bound to plasma proteins. This produces an intensity value of 0-255 based on an 8-bit greyscale. The investigators measured this value preoperatively when measured and compared to the post-intervention measurement. The device can calculate the cumulative intensity of a defined region of interest which the investigators categorized as the lateral, lower, medial, or nipple-areola region of the breast. The investigators also evaluated the cumulative value of these areas in total. Rate of perfusion was simply this value over time (90 seconds).

    At the time of surgery (day 1)

  • Percentage of Original Preoperative Blood Supply (Perfusion) Post Reconstruction

    * Laser-assisted fluorescent angiography via the Spy Elite imaging device will be utilized to capture this data during mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Standard postoperative patient follow up will assess for perfusion. * The Spy device quantifies perfusion by measuring relative fluorescence of indocyanine green bound to plasma proteins. This produces an intensity value of 0-255 based on an 8-bit greyscale. The investigators measured this value preoperatively when measured and compared to the post-intervention measurement. The device can calculate the cumulative intensity of a defined region of interest which the investigators categorized as the lateral, lower, medial, or nipple-areola region of the breast. The investigators also evaluated the cumulative value of these areas in total. Rate of perfusion was simply this value over time (90 seconds).

    At the time of surgery (day 1)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Breast Q Score

    Up to 3 months post permanent implant placement

  • Number of Participants With Tissue Expander

    Up to 3 months post permanent implant placement

  • Mean Operative Times for Mastectomy

    At the time of surgery (day 1)

  • Breast Weight

    At time of surgery (day 1)

Study Arms (3)

Inframammary Fold Incision Cohort

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

* Inframammary fold incision which is in the crease under the breast. * Perfusion of the involved breast will be monitored at three separate time points using laser-assisted fluorescence angiography (Spy Elite, LifeCell) * Intraoperatively prior to mastectomy * At the conclusion of NASSM (following completion of mastectomy procedure and prior to implant insertion during reconstruction) - (ie. Mastectomy done, implant not in yet) * Following the conclusion of reconstruction with an immediate implant and skin closure with either temporary staples or final suture placement (ie. Mastectomy done and implant in)

Procedure: Inframammary Fold IncisionDevice: Laser-assisted fluorescence angiographyDrug: Indocyanine Green

Lateral Radial Incision Cohort

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

* Lateral radial incision * Perfusion of the involved breast will be monitored at three separate time points using laser-assisted fluorescence angiography (Spy Elite, LifeCell) * Intraoperatively prior to mastectomy * At the conclusion of NASSM (following completion of mastectomy procedure and prior to implant insertion during reconstruction) - (ie. Mastectomy done, implant not in yet) * Following the conclusion of reconstruction with an immediate implant and skin closure with either temporary staples or final suture placement (ie. Mastectomy done and implant in)

Procedure: Lateral Radial IncisionDevice: Laser-assisted fluorescence angiographyDrug: Indocyanine Green

Non-Randomized Cohort

OTHER

* Patients in which the surgeon feels that for oncologic reasons must have a specific incision (either inframammary fold or lateral radial incision) and cannot be randomized due to concerns of compromising clinical care but otherwise meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be offered participation as part of a non-randomized cohort. * Perfusion of the involved breast will be monitored at three separate time points using laser-assisted fluorescence angiography (Spy Elite, LifeCell) * Intraoperatively prior to mastectomy * At the conclusion of NASSM (following completion of mastectomy procedure and prior to implant insertion during reconstruction) - (ie. Mastectomy done, implant not in yet) * Following the conclusion of reconstruction with an immediate implant and skin closure with either temporary staples or final suture placement (ie. Mastectomy done and implant in)

Procedure: Inframammary Fold Incision or Lateral Radial IncisionDevice: Laser-assisted fluorescence angiographyDrug: Indocyanine Green

Interventions

Lateral Radial Incision Cohort
Inframammary Fold Incision Cohort
Also known as: Spy Elite, LifeCell.
Inframammary Fold Incision CohortLateral Radial Incision CohortNon-Randomized Cohort
Inframammary Fold Incision CohortLateral Radial Incision CohortNon-Randomized Cohort

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient must be scheduled to undergo either a single or bilateral elective nipple-areola skin sparing mastectomy (NASSM) procedure with planned immediate reconstruction.
  • Patient must be 18 years of age or older.
  • Karnofsky Performance Scale of at least 80%.
  • Patient must be able to understand and willing to sign a written informed consent document.

You may not qualify if:

  • Cognitive impairment.
  • BMI \< 18 or \> 35
  • Breast \>800 grams or \<100 grams in predicted weight. "Breast" includes the breast tissue and in cases where the patient already has cosmetic breast implants, the additional breast implant mass. The sum total must be \>100 g and \<800 g.
  • History of radiation to the chest wall or breast being studied
  • Patients who have a history of allergy to iodides or iodinated contrast agents
  • Surgeon's opinion at the time of surgery that the subject's well-being would be compromised (e.g. significant comorbidities, intraoperative findings of a higher stage cancer or other independent acute health problems). If the contralateral breast is undergoing a nipple-sparing mastectomy with reconstruction as well, then the contralateral breast can be studied so long as there is no compromise to any element of their care.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

Related Publications (18)

  • Kim HJ, Park EH, Lim WS, Seo JY, Koh BS, Lee TJ, Eom JS, Lee SW, Son BH, Lee JW, Ahn SH. Nipple areola skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure: a single center study. Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):493-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c5dc4e.

    PMID: 20134317BACKGROUND
  • Cense HA, Rutgers EJ, Lopes Cardozo M, Van Lanschot JJ. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001 Sep;27(6):521-6. doi: 10.1053/ejso.2001.1130.

    PMID: 11520082BACKGROUND
  • Paepke S, Schmid R, Fleckner S, Paepke D, Niemeyer M, Schmalfeldt B, Jacobs VR, Kiechle M. Subcutaneous mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola skin: broadening the indications. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):288-92. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b0c7d8.

    PMID: 19638905BACKGROUND
  • de Alcantara Filho P, Capko D, Barry JM, Morrow M, Pusic A, Sacchini VS. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(11):3117-22. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1974-y. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

    PMID: 21847697BACKGROUND
  • Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Koch RM, Chabner-Thompson E. An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb;127(2):514-524. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318200a961.

    PMID: 21285756BACKGROUND
  • Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros AC, Luini A, Pluchinotta A, Pinotti M, Boratto MG, Ricci MD, Ruiz CA, Nisida AC, Veronesi P, Petit J, Arnone P, Bassi F, Disa JJ, Garcia-Etienne CA, Borgen PI. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Nov;203(5):704-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.015. Epub 2006 Sep 11.

    PMID: 17084333BACKGROUND
  • Palmieri B, Baitchev G, Grappolini S, Costa A, Benuzzi G. Delayed nipple-sparing modified subcutaneous mastectomy: rationale and technique. Breast J. 2005 May-Jun;11(3):173-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.21520.x.

    PMID: 15871701BACKGROUND
  • Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, Kundt G, Reimer T. The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg. 2009 Mar;249(3):461-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819a044f.

    PMID: 19247035BACKGROUND
  • Tepper OM, Karp NS, Small K, Unger J, Rudolph L, Pritchard A, Choi M. Three-dimensional imaging provides valuable clinical data to aid in unilateral tissue expander-implant breast reconstruction. Breast J. 2008 Nov-Dec;14(6):543-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2008.00645.x.

    PMID: 19054001BACKGROUND
  • Lista F, Ahmad J. Vertical scar reduction mammaplasty: a 15-year experience including a review of 250 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Jun;117(7):2152-65; discussion 2166-9. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000218173.16272.6c.

    PMID: 16772910BACKGROUND
  • Garwood ER, Moore D, Ewing C, Hwang ES, Alvarado M, Foster RD, Esserman LJ. Total skin-sparing mastectomy: complications and local recurrence rates in 2 cohorts of patients. Ann Surg. 2009 Jan;249(1):26-32. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818e41a7.

    PMID: 19106672BACKGROUND
  • Ashikari RH, Ashikari AY, Kelemen PR, Salzberg CA. Subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction for prevention of breast cancer for high-risk patients. Breast Cancer. 2008;15(3):185-91. doi: 10.1007/s12282-008-0059-7.

    PMID: 18575951BACKGROUND
  • Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, Muller H, Kuchenmeister I, Makovitzky J, Kundt G, Friese K. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003 Jul;238(1):120-7. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000077922.38307.cd.

    PMID: 12832974BACKGROUND
  • Komorowska-Timek E, Gurtner GC. Intraoperative perfusion mapping with laser-assisted indocyanine green imaging can predict and prevent complications in immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Apr;125(4):1065-1073. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d17f80.

    PMID: 20335859BACKGROUND
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.

    PMID: 19897823BACKGROUND
  • Losken A, Zenn MR, Hammel JA, Walsh MW, Carlson GW. Assessment of zonal perfusion using intraoperative angiography during abdominal flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Apr;129(4):618e-624e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182450b16.

    PMID: 22456376BACKGROUND
  • Ashitate Y, Lee BT, Ngo LH, Laurence RG, Hutteman M, Oketokoun R, Lunsford E, Soo Choi H, Frangioni JV. Quantitative assessment of nipple perfusion with near-infrared fluorescence imaging. Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Feb;70(2):149-53. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822f9af7.

    PMID: 21862913BACKGROUND
  • Odom EB, Parikh RP, Um G, Kantola SW, Cyr AE, Margenthaler JA, Tenenbaum MM, Myckatyn TM. Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Incisions for Cancer Extirpation Prospective Cohort Trial: Perfusion, Complications, and Patient Outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jul;142(1):13-26. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004498.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Interventions

Indocyanine Green

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

IndolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Limitations and Caveats

Study had randomized-controlled trial design with assignment to IMF or LR incision but during enrollment patients frequently withdrew from randomization due to patient/surgical oncology preference and/or preexisting scars precluding randomization.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Marissa J. Tenebaum, M.D.
Organization
Washington University School of Medicine

Study Officials

  • Marissa J Tenenbaum, M.D.

    Washington University School of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2013

First Posted

October 25, 2013

Study Start

March 28, 2013

Primary Completion

April 27, 2016

Study Completion

April 17, 2017

Last Updated

April 18, 2018

Results First Posted

April 18, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations