Study to Assess Perfusion and Patient Satisfaction in Nipple-Areola Mastectomy With Immediate Reconstruction
NASSM
A Prospective Randomized Trial to Assess Perfusion and Patient Satisfaction in Nipple-Areola Mastectomy With Immediate Reconstruction
1 other identifier
interventional
79
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators hypothesize that nipple-areola skin sparing mastectomy (NASSM) performed through an inframammary incision has a superior blood supply relative to a lateral oblique incision. Moreover, by minimizing complications and optimizing aesthetic outcomes, the investigators believe it will be associated with significantly higher patient reported outcome scores. The addition of information gained by use of intraoperative laser-assisted fluorescent angiography (measured with the Spy Elite imaging device) will reduce complication rates by directing intraoperative resection of ischemic tissue and limiting the volume of immediate implant placement in instances where real time imaging would suggest compromised perfusion. These quantifiable, objective measures will justify the use of NASSM and immediate implant placement coupled with intraoperative laser-assisted fluorescent angiography in prosthetic based breast reconstruction despite longer operative times.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 28, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 14, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 25, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 27, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 17, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 18, 2018
CompletedApril 18, 2018
March 1, 2018
3.1 years
October 14, 2013
January 11, 2018
March 20, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Original Preoperative Blood Supply (Perfusion) Post Nipple Sparing Mastectomy
* Laser-assisted fluorescent angiography via the Spy Elite imaging device will be utilized to capture this data during mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Standard postoperative patient follow up will assess for perfusion. * The Spy device quantifies perfusion by measuring relative fluorescence of indocyanine green bound to plasma proteins. This produces an intensity value of 0-255 based on an 8-bit greyscale. The investigators measured this value preoperatively when measured and compared to the post-intervention measurement. The device can calculate the cumulative intensity of a defined region of interest which the investigators categorized as the lateral, lower, medial, or nipple-areola region of the breast. The investigators also evaluated the cumulative value of these areas in total. Rate of perfusion was simply this value over time (90 seconds).
At the time of surgery (day 1)
Percentage of Original Preoperative Blood Supply (Perfusion) Post Reconstruction
* Laser-assisted fluorescent angiography via the Spy Elite imaging device will be utilized to capture this data during mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Standard postoperative patient follow up will assess for perfusion. * The Spy device quantifies perfusion by measuring relative fluorescence of indocyanine green bound to plasma proteins. This produces an intensity value of 0-255 based on an 8-bit greyscale. The investigators measured this value preoperatively when measured and compared to the post-intervention measurement. The device can calculate the cumulative intensity of a defined region of interest which the investigators categorized as the lateral, lower, medial, or nipple-areola region of the breast. The investigators also evaluated the cumulative value of these areas in total. Rate of perfusion was simply this value over time (90 seconds).
At the time of surgery (day 1)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Breast Q Score
Up to 3 months post permanent implant placement
Number of Participants With Tissue Expander
Up to 3 months post permanent implant placement
Mean Operative Times for Mastectomy
At the time of surgery (day 1)
Breast Weight
At time of surgery (day 1)
Study Arms (3)
Inframammary Fold Incision Cohort
ACTIVE COMPARATOR* Inframammary fold incision which is in the crease under the breast. * Perfusion of the involved breast will be monitored at three separate time points using laser-assisted fluorescence angiography (Spy Elite, LifeCell) * Intraoperatively prior to mastectomy * At the conclusion of NASSM (following completion of mastectomy procedure and prior to implant insertion during reconstruction) - (ie. Mastectomy done, implant not in yet) * Following the conclusion of reconstruction with an immediate implant and skin closure with either temporary staples or final suture placement (ie. Mastectomy done and implant in)
Lateral Radial Incision Cohort
ACTIVE COMPARATOR* Lateral radial incision * Perfusion of the involved breast will be monitored at three separate time points using laser-assisted fluorescence angiography (Spy Elite, LifeCell) * Intraoperatively prior to mastectomy * At the conclusion of NASSM (following completion of mastectomy procedure and prior to implant insertion during reconstruction) - (ie. Mastectomy done, implant not in yet) * Following the conclusion of reconstruction with an immediate implant and skin closure with either temporary staples or final suture placement (ie. Mastectomy done and implant in)
Non-Randomized Cohort
OTHER* Patients in which the surgeon feels that for oncologic reasons must have a specific incision (either inframammary fold or lateral radial incision) and cannot be randomized due to concerns of compromising clinical care but otherwise meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be offered participation as part of a non-randomized cohort. * Perfusion of the involved breast will be monitored at three separate time points using laser-assisted fluorescence angiography (Spy Elite, LifeCell) * Intraoperatively prior to mastectomy * At the conclusion of NASSM (following completion of mastectomy procedure and prior to implant insertion during reconstruction) - (ie. Mastectomy done, implant not in yet) * Following the conclusion of reconstruction with an immediate implant and skin closure with either temporary staples or final suture placement (ie. Mastectomy done and implant in)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient must be scheduled to undergo either a single or bilateral elective nipple-areola skin sparing mastectomy (NASSM) procedure with planned immediate reconstruction.
- Patient must be 18 years of age or older.
- Karnofsky Performance Scale of at least 80%.
- Patient must be able to understand and willing to sign a written informed consent document.
You may not qualify if:
- Cognitive impairment.
- BMI \< 18 or \> 35
- Breast \>800 grams or \<100 grams in predicted weight. "Breast" includes the breast tissue and in cases where the patient already has cosmetic breast implants, the additional breast implant mass. The sum total must be \>100 g and \<800 g.
- History of radiation to the chest wall or breast being studied
- Patients who have a history of allergy to iodides or iodinated contrast agents
- Surgeon's opinion at the time of surgery that the subject's well-being would be compromised (e.g. significant comorbidities, intraoperative findings of a higher stage cancer or other independent acute health problems). If the contralateral breast is undergoing a nipple-sparing mastectomy with reconstruction as well, then the contralateral breast can be studied so long as there is no compromise to any element of their care.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Washington University School of Medicinelead
- LifeCellcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Related Publications (18)
Kim HJ, Park EH, Lim WS, Seo JY, Koh BS, Lee TJ, Eom JS, Lee SW, Son BH, Lee JW, Ahn SH. Nipple areola skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure: a single center study. Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):493-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c5dc4e.
PMID: 20134317BACKGROUNDCense HA, Rutgers EJ, Lopes Cardozo M, Van Lanschot JJ. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001 Sep;27(6):521-6. doi: 10.1053/ejso.2001.1130.
PMID: 11520082BACKGROUNDPaepke S, Schmid R, Fleckner S, Paepke D, Niemeyer M, Schmalfeldt B, Jacobs VR, Kiechle M. Subcutaneous mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola skin: broadening the indications. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):288-92. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b0c7d8.
PMID: 19638905BACKGROUNDde Alcantara Filho P, Capko D, Barry JM, Morrow M, Pusic A, Sacchini VS. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(11):3117-22. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1974-y. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
PMID: 21847697BACKGROUNDSalzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Koch RM, Chabner-Thompson E. An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb;127(2):514-524. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318200a961.
PMID: 21285756BACKGROUNDSacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros AC, Luini A, Pluchinotta A, Pinotti M, Boratto MG, Ricci MD, Ruiz CA, Nisida AC, Veronesi P, Petit J, Arnone P, Bassi F, Disa JJ, Garcia-Etienne CA, Borgen PI. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Nov;203(5):704-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.015. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
PMID: 17084333BACKGROUNDPalmieri B, Baitchev G, Grappolini S, Costa A, Benuzzi G. Delayed nipple-sparing modified subcutaneous mastectomy: rationale and technique. Breast J. 2005 May-Jun;11(3):173-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.21520.x.
PMID: 15871701BACKGROUNDGerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, Kundt G, Reimer T. The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg. 2009 Mar;249(3):461-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819a044f.
PMID: 19247035BACKGROUNDTepper OM, Karp NS, Small K, Unger J, Rudolph L, Pritchard A, Choi M. Three-dimensional imaging provides valuable clinical data to aid in unilateral tissue expander-implant breast reconstruction. Breast J. 2008 Nov-Dec;14(6):543-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2008.00645.x.
PMID: 19054001BACKGROUNDLista F, Ahmad J. Vertical scar reduction mammaplasty: a 15-year experience including a review of 250 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Jun;117(7):2152-65; discussion 2166-9. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000218173.16272.6c.
PMID: 16772910BACKGROUNDGarwood ER, Moore D, Ewing C, Hwang ES, Alvarado M, Foster RD, Esserman LJ. Total skin-sparing mastectomy: complications and local recurrence rates in 2 cohorts of patients. Ann Surg. 2009 Jan;249(1):26-32. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818e41a7.
PMID: 19106672BACKGROUNDAshikari RH, Ashikari AY, Kelemen PR, Salzberg CA. Subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction for prevention of breast cancer for high-risk patients. Breast Cancer. 2008;15(3):185-91. doi: 10.1007/s12282-008-0059-7.
PMID: 18575951BACKGROUNDGerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, Muller H, Kuchenmeister I, Makovitzky J, Kundt G, Friese K. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003 Jul;238(1):120-7. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000077922.38307.cd.
PMID: 12832974BACKGROUNDKomorowska-Timek E, Gurtner GC. Intraoperative perfusion mapping with laser-assisted indocyanine green imaging can predict and prevent complications in immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Apr;125(4):1065-1073. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d17f80.
PMID: 20335859BACKGROUNDFaul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
PMID: 19897823BACKGROUNDLosken A, Zenn MR, Hammel JA, Walsh MW, Carlson GW. Assessment of zonal perfusion using intraoperative angiography during abdominal flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Apr;129(4):618e-624e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182450b16.
PMID: 22456376BACKGROUNDAshitate Y, Lee BT, Ngo LH, Laurence RG, Hutteman M, Oketokoun R, Lunsford E, Soo Choi H, Frangioni JV. Quantitative assessment of nipple perfusion with near-infrared fluorescence imaging. Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Feb;70(2):149-53. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822f9af7.
PMID: 21862913BACKGROUNDOdom EB, Parikh RP, Um G, Kantola SW, Cyr AE, Margenthaler JA, Tenenbaum MM, Myckatyn TM. Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Incisions for Cancer Extirpation Prospective Cohort Trial: Perfusion, Complications, and Patient Outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jul;142(1):13-26. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004498.
PMID: 29878989DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Study had randomized-controlled trial design with assignment to IMF or LR incision but during enrollment patients frequently withdrew from randomization due to patient/surgical oncology preference and/or preexisting scars precluding randomization.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Marissa J. Tenebaum, M.D.
- Organization
- Washington University School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marissa J Tenenbaum, M.D.
Washington University School of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 14, 2013
First Posted
October 25, 2013
Study Start
March 28, 2013
Primary Completion
April 27, 2016
Study Completion
April 17, 2017
Last Updated
April 18, 2018
Results First Posted
April 18, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share