Diphenhydramine as an Adjunctive Sedative in Patients on Chronic Opioids
Use of Diphenhydramine as an Adjunctive Sedative for Colonoscopy in Patients Chronically on Opioids
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To access the efficacy of adding diphenhydramine as adjunct to improve sedation and to reduce the amount of standard sedatives used during colonoscopy in patients on chronic opioids.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Dec 2013
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 11, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 11, 2020
CompletedMarch 11, 2020
March 1, 2020
4.2 years
October 11, 2013
August 24, 2018
March 3, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Dosage of Fentanyl
Moderate sedation (using the American Society of Anesthesiologists definition of maintaining purposeful response to verbal or tactile stimulation, adequate ventilation requiring no airway protection, and maintenance of cardiovascular function) was then achieved using incremental doses of the combination of intravenous midazolam (1 mg) and fentanyl (25 μg) given every 2 to 3 minutes. To minimize any crossover, additional diphenhydramine was not permitted.
From induction (first dose of sedative) to end of procedure
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Quality of Sedation
During the colonoscopy and 24 hours after discharge
Duration of Procedure
Time from induction (first dose of sedative) to discharge
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
From induction (first dose of sedative) to discharge
24 Hour Follow up Pain Score
About 24 hours after the procedure
Dosage of Midazolam
From induction (first dose of sedative) to end of procedure
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Diphenhydramine
EXPERIMENTALDiphenhydramine 50 mg IV 3 minutes prior to administration of other sedatives
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATOR0.9% sodium chloride 10 ml IV 3 minuted prior to administration of other sedatives
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 18-64 years undergoing screening, surveillance, diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy
- Patient on chronic opioids defined as at least 5 mg of morphine or its equivalent at least 3 days per week for more than 3 months
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to execute informed consent
- Allergy to Diphenhydramine, fentanyl or midazolam
- Known or suspected pregnancy
- Endoscopic procedure without sedation
- Patient scheduled to have other endoscopic procedures on the same day
- Prior alimentary tract surgery
- Severe cardiopulmonary disease (ASA IV)
- Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MOI) use within 2 weeks of procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
Related Publications (11)
Abraham NS, Fallone CA, Mayrand S, Huang J, Wieczorek P, Barkun AN. Sedation versus no sedation in the performance of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a Canadian randomized controlled cost-outcome study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep;99(9):1692-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40157.x.
PMID: 15330904BACKGROUNDZubarik R, Ganguly E, Benway D, Ferrentino N, Moses P, Vecchio J. Procedure-related abdominal discomfort in patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Dec;97(12):3056-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.07101.x.
PMID: 12492190BACKGROUNDBergeron P, Enns J, Delima L, Dupuis JY, Wynands JE. Effects of routine premedication for cardiac catheterization on sedation, level of anxiety and arterial oxygen saturation. Can J Cardiol. 1995 Mar;11(3):201-5.
PMID: 7889437BACKGROUNDCook PJ, Flanagan R, James IM. Diazepam tolerance: effect of age, regular sedation, and alcohol. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Aug 11;289(6441):351-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6441.351.
PMID: 6432093BACKGROUNDPena LR, Mardini HE, Nickl NJ. Development of an instrument to assess and predict satisfaction and poor tolerance among patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. Dig Dis Sci. 2005 Oct;50(10):1860-71. doi: 10.1007/s10620-005-2952-7.
PMID: 16187188BACKGROUNDKeeffe EB, O'Connor KW. 1989 A/S/G/E survey of endoscopic sedation and monitoring practices. Gastrointest Endosc. 1990 May-Jun;36(3 Suppl):S13-8.
PMID: 2351253BACKGROUNDHirsh I, Vaissler A, Chernin J, Segol O, Pizov R. Fentanyl or tramadol, with midazolam, for outpatient colonoscopy: analgesia, sedation, and safety. Dig Dis Sci. 2006 Nov;51(11):1946-51. doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-9413-9. Epub 2006 Sep 29.
PMID: 17009113BACKGROUNDTu RH, Grewall P, Leung JW, Suryaprasad AG, Sheykhzadeh PI, Doan C, Garcia JC, Zhang N, Prindiville T, Mann S, Trudeau W. Diphenhydramine as an adjunct to sedation for colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Jan;63(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.08.015.
PMID: 16377322BACKGROUNDRoach CL, Husain N, Zabinsky J, Welch E, Garg R. Moderate sedation for echocardiography of preschoolers. Pediatr Cardiol. 2010 May;31(4):469-73. doi: 10.1007/s00246-009-9622-z. Epub 2010 Jan 3.
PMID: 20047024BACKGROUNDHofmeister EH, Egger CM. Evaluation of diphenhydramine as a sedative for dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005 Apr 1;226(7):1092-4. doi: 10.2460/javma.2005.226.1092.
PMID: 15825733BACKGROUNDHusain Z, Hussain K, Nair R, Steinman R. Diphenhydramine induced QT prolongation and torsade de pointes: An uncommon effect of a common drug. Cardiol J. 2010;17(5):509-11.
PMID: 20865683BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Salman Nusrat
- Organization
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center and VAMC, Oklahoma City
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Salman Nusrat, MD
University of Oklahoma
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohammad Madhoun, MD MS
Univeristy of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 11, 2013
First Posted
October 22, 2013
Study Start
December 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 1, 2018
Study Completion
July 1, 2018
Last Updated
March 11, 2020
Results First Posted
March 11, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03