NCT01604187

Brief Summary

Colonoscopy is generally considered an invasive procedure that causes remarkable pain to the patient. The pain associated with the procedure is not caused by the insertion of the scope but from inflating of the colon in order to do the inspection. It has been shown that colonoscopy can be performed successfully without sedation (Leung, 2010), but many patients feel discomfort during the procedure. Factors predicting a painful colonoscopy are female-gender, degree of patient nervousness and the technical difficulty of the colonoscopy (Ylinen et al. 2009). Also age under 40, previous abdominal surgery and use of sedation are associated with painful colonoscopy ( Seip et al. 2009). Most often sedation and/or analgesia are achieved by administering a benzodiazepine or a combination of a benzodiazepine and an opioid (Fanti et al. 2009, Maskelar et al. 2009,), dexmedetomidine (Dere et al. 2009) or by using non-pharmacologic methods (Amer-Cuenca et al. 2011). Tramadol as monotherapy did not significantly decrease pain intensity or endoscopist's evaluation of colonoscopy (Grossi et al. 2004). Currently, intravenous midazolam is the drug used most commonly to introduce some sedation for colonoscopy. Intravenous sedation definitely increases the cost of procedure; drug administration, need for pulse oximetry monitoring and the need for follow-up after the procedure make colonoscopy sometimes expensive and troublesome. It has also been shown, that low-dose midazolam neither relieves discomfort nor makes patients forget it (Elphick et al. 2009). Fentanyl is a short-acting opioid widely used in anesthesia management. Transmucosal sublingual formulation of fentanyl has been developed to further improve the management of pain. When administered as a sublingual fast-dissolving tablet (Abstral®) that is placed under the tongue, the effects is fast and predictable. Its active ingredient is absorbed by the body through the mucous membrane. After administration of buccal fentanyl maximum plasma drug concentration was measured after 25 minutes (Darwish et al. 2011). Plasma fentanyl concentrations versus time following buccal and sublingual administration are very similar (Darwish et al. 2008). Abstral® sublingual tablets should be administered directly under the tongue at the deepest part. Sublingual administration is an easy and non-invasive method of pain treatment for the patient coming to colonoscopy done as an office based procedure. Other advantages compared to invasive methods are improved comfort of patients and no need for intravenous access because of pain relief. Before, it has been used in the management of breakthrough pain in cancer patients. Sublingual fentanyl is shown to be effective and well-tolerated for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain (Uberall et al. 2011). The use of transmucosal tablet for colonoscopy patients is a quite new approach.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
158

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2012

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 21, 2012

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 23, 2012

Completed
6.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 22, 2019

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

September 11, 2019

Status Verified

September 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

7.1 years

First QC Date

May 21, 2012

Last Update Submit

September 9, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

sublingual fentanylpain in coloscopyThe efficacy and safety of fentanyl transmucosal tablet to placebo in patients having colonoscopy.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Efficacy of fentanyl transmucosal tablet to placebo in patients having colonoscopy.

    Anxiety will be measured using NRS (0 = no anxiety, 10=maximal anxiety). Pain will be monitored by using numercal rating scale NRS (0-10), sedation by using NRS (0-10, 0= not sedated at all, 10=no response) . Nurse's and surgeon's satisfaction with the procedure will be evaluated using NRS (0-10). Adverse effects of opioids will be evaluated by patients using NRS (0-10)) for the following items: drowsiness (alert / very drowsy), pleasantness (very unpleasant / very pleasant feeling) and nausea/vomiting (no nausea / very strong nausea). In addition, all other adverse effects will be recorded.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The safety of fentanyl transmucosal tablet to placebo in patients having colonoscopy.

Study Arms (2)

Fentanyl

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Ten minutes before the procedure fentanyl 100 mikrograms sublingual tablet will be given to the patient.

Drug: Fentanyl

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Ten minutes before the procedure placebo sublingual tablet will be given to the patient.

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

Ten minutes before the procedure fentanyl sublingual tablet (Abstral ® 100 µg, ProStrakan) will be given to the patient.

Fentanyl

Ten minutes before the procedure placebo sublingual tablet will be given to the patient.

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ASA I-III
  • Colonoscopy
  • Written informed consent from participating subject

You may not qualify if:

  • A previous history of intolerance to the study drug or related compounds and additives
  • History of alcoholism, drug abuse, psychiatric, psychological or other emotional problems that are likely to invalidate informed consent
  • Sleep apnoea
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • BMI ≥ 35 or weight \< 50 kg
  • SpO2 \< 90 %
  • Concomitant drug therapy known to cause significant enzyme induction or inhibition of CYP 3A4.
  • Pregnancy or nursing.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Turku University Hospital

Turku, 20521, Finland

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Interventions

Fentanyl

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PiperidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Klaus T Olkkola, professor

    Turku University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2012

First Posted

May 23, 2012

Study Start

April 1, 2012

Primary Completion

April 22, 2019

Study Completion

April 30, 2019

Last Updated

September 11, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-09

Locations