NCT01967342

Brief Summary

Chronic pain is a significant public health problem that affects over 116 million Americans, costs $600 billion annually, and is unequally borne by people in low-income brackets, especially ethnic minorities. Many individuals also have health literacy deficits (difficulty understanding their illness and difficulty navigating the health care system for treatment) putting them at a greater disadvantage. Treatment usually relies on expensive medical interventions that often have negative side-effects. Psychosocial treatments, like Pain Education and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT), show promise, but are usually unavailable. Clinicians are poorly equipped to provide psychosocial treatments to patients with low health literacy. CBT has not been adapted and supported for use in individuals with low health literacy, and even educational materials are often poorly adapted for their needs. To address this problem, the PI completed a small trial showing benefits from health literacy-adapted pain education and CBT groups for chronic pain in a population with low income and low health literacy. Patients in both treatments reported lower pain by the end of treatment, and the effects were maintained at one year. Patients in the CBT group also reported less depression. The current study uses a larger sample, and directly compares these psychosocial treatments to medical treatment-as-usual to seek better evidence for or against their widespread use in community settings. Our research questions:

  1. 1.In people with chronic pain and low income and/or low literacy, does participating in a health-literacy-adapted psychosocial treatment improve their pain and interference in daily activities due to pain by the end of treatment when compared with a group receiving typical medical care, and are these effects maintained 6 months later?
  2. 2.Does participation in the CBT pain management group improve symptoms of depression better than a pain education group by the end of treatment, and are these effects maintained 6 months later?

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
290

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable chronic-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable chronic-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 12, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 16, 2013

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 22, 2013

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2016

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 7, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

June 21, 2017

Status Verified

March 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

October 16, 2013

Results QC Date

January 13, 2017

Last Update Submit

May 26, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

chronic painpainchronic pain syndromewidespread chronic painback painliteracyhealth literacygroup therapypsychosocial treatmentcognitive-behavioral therapypain educationhealth disparitiespatient-centered outcomes

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Brief Pain Inventory-Intensity (BPI-Intensity)

    Brief Pain Inventory-Intensity indicates level of pain intensity. Higher scores (range 0-10) reflect higher perceived pain severity.

    Post-treatment (10-weeks) and follow-up (6 months)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Brief Pain Inventory-Interference (BPI-Interference)

    Post-treatment (10-weeks) and follow-up (6 months)

  • Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9)

    Post-treatment (10-weeks) and follow-up (6 months)

  • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Pain Intensity

    Retrospective self-report at post-treatment (10-weeks) and follow-up (6-months).

Study Arms (3)

Pain Ed

EXPERIMENTAL

Pain Education: A psychosocial treatment group focusing on providing core pain education to low-income patients who may not have received this information due to existing barriers that often includes limited health literacy. This condition also included medical treatment as usual.

Behavioral: Pain EdOther: Usual Care

CBT for Pain

EXPERIMENTAL

Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Pain: A psychosocial treatment group focusing on providing core pain education and cognitive-behavior skills to low-income patients who may not have received this information due to existing barriers that often includes limited health literacy. This condition also included medical treatment as usual.

Behavioral: CBT for PainOther: Usual Care

Usual Care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Usual Care (Medical Treatment-as-Usual: A control/comparison condition in which patients receive on-going standard care at the federally qualified health center partnering in this research. Facets of care may include medication, surgery, chiropractic, and physical therapy, among others, which are available to all patients in all arms.

Other: Usual Care

Interventions

Pain EdBEHAVIORAL

A 10-week psychosocial group treatment for chronic pain that focuses on providing information about the development, course, and treatment of chronic pain, as well as information about factors associated with reduced pain (e.g., sleep). In particular, it seeks to empower patients to take ownership of their chronic pain care through building deeper knowledge about their pain condition and their interactions with the health care system.

Also known as: EDU, Pain Education, Group Pain Education, Chronic Pain Education, Group Chronic Pain Education
Pain Ed
CBT for PainBEHAVIORAL

A 10-week psychosocial group treatment for chronic pain that focuses on providing information and skills about the development, course, and treatment of chronic pain, as well as information about factors associated with reduced pain (e.g., sleep). In particular, it seeks to empower patients to self-manage their chronic pain through building deeper knowledge about and better skills for improving their pain condition and their interactions with the health care system.

Also known as: Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Pain, Group CBT for Pain, Group Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Pain, CBT for Chronic Pain, Group CBT for Chronic Pain, Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain, Group Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain
CBT for Pain

A comparison condition in which patients receive standard individualized medical care from the federally qualified health center partnering on this study. Care can include basic biological interventions, such as medication or surgery, as well as supplementary care such as chiropractic or physical therapy. However, cost has a pragmatic influence on the amount of services provided, sought, and received.

Also known as: UC, Standard Care, Treatment as Usual, TAU, Medical Treatment as Usual
CBT for PainPain EdUsual Care

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Must be at least 19 yrs-old in order to consent to treatment.
  • Must have received at least one diagnosis consistent with chronic pain by a physician at one of the participating primary care clinics.
  • Must have experienced pain most days of the month for 3 months, and although pain may have more than one pain source, all pain must be non-malignant (e.g., not cancer- or HIV-related).
  • Must be able to speak and understand English.
  • Must have a telephone or other avenue of communication for contact regarding the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Must not demonstrate significant cognitive impairment (based on results of a cognitive screener).
  • Must not have current, uncontrolled serious psychological disturbance (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder) or active substance abuse (based on responses to a structured diagnostic interview).
  • Must have minimal literacy skills (i.e., read at the 1st grade level).
  • Must have been stabilized for at least 4 weeks on current pain and psychotropic medication regimen to reduce potential confounds to treatment results.
  • Must not have a surgery scheduled for the intervention period (\~3 months).
  • Must neither be currently receiving a psychosocial treatment for pain (though they may be receiving psychotherapy for non-pain difficulties) nor be a participant in our previous treatment studies.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Whatley Health Services, Inc.

Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35401, United States

Location

University of Alabama, Department of Psychology

Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35487-0348, United States

Location

East Carolina University

Greenville, North Carolina, 27858, United States

Location

Related Publications (14)

  • Thorn BE, Day MA, Burns J, Kuhajda MC, Gaskins SW, Sweeney K, McConley R, Ward CL, Cabbil C. Randomized trial of group cognitive behavioral therapy compared with a pain education control for low-literacy rural people with chronic pain. Pain. 2011 Dec;152(12):2710-2720. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.007. Epub 2011 Sep 14.

    PMID: 21920668BACKGROUND
  • Day MA, Thorn BE, Kapoor S. A qualitative analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing a cognitive-behavioral treatment with education. J Pain. 2011 Sep;12(9):941-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.02.354. Epub 2011 Aug 11.

    PMID: 21839689BACKGROUND
  • Kuhajda MC, Thorn BE, Gaskins SW, Day MA, Cabbil CM. Literacy and cultural adaptations for cognitive behavioral therapy in a rural pain population. Transl Behav Med. 2011 Jun;1(2):216-23. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0026-2.

    PMID: 24073046BACKGROUND
  • Day MA, Thorn BE. The relationship of demographic and psychosocial variables to pain-related outcomes in a rural chronic pain population. Pain. 2010 Nov;151(2):467-474. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.08.015.

    PMID: 20817401BACKGROUND
  • Campbell LC. Addressing literacy as a barrier in delivery and evaluation of cognitive-behavioral therapy for pain management. Pain. 2011 Dec;152(12):2679-2680. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Sep 29. No abstract available.

    PMID: 21963312BACKGROUND
  • Thorn BE, Burns JW. Common and specific treatment mechanisms in psychosocial pain interventions: the need for a new research agenda. Pain. 2011 Apr;152(4):705-706. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.12.017. Epub 2011 Jan 11. No abstract available.

    PMID: 21227586BACKGROUND
  • Burns JW, Gerhart J, Van Dyke BP, Morais CA, Newman AK, Thorn B. Examination of mechanism effects in cognitive behavioral therapy and pain education: analyses of weekly assessments. Pain. 2021 Sep 1;162(9):2446-2455. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002237.

  • Newman AK, Thorn BE. Intersectional identity approach to chronic pain disparities using latent class analysis. Pain. 2022 Apr 1;163(4):e547-e556. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002407.

  • Morais CA, Newman AK, Van Dyke BP, Thorn B. The Effect of Literacy-Adapted Psychosocial Treatments on Biomedical and Biopsychosocial Pain Conceptualization. J Pain. 2021 Nov;22(11):1396-1407. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.04.005. Epub 2021 May 15.

  • Newman AK, Morais CA, Van Dyke BP, Thorn BE. An Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Pain Concepts Questionnaire in a Low-SES Setting. J Pain. 2021 Jan;22(1):57-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 Jun 27.

  • Van Dyke BP, Newman AK, Morais CA, Burns JW, Eyer JC, Thorn BE. Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects in a Randomized Trial of Literacy-Adapted Group Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, Pain Psychoeducation, and Usual Medical Care for Multiply Disadvantaged Patients With Chronic Pain. J Pain. 2019 Oct;20(10):1236-1248. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

  • Newman AK, Kapoor S, Thorn BE. Health Care Utilization for Chronic Pain in Low-Income Settings. Pain Med. 2018 Dec 1;19(12):2387-2397. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny119.

  • Thorn BE, Eyer JC, Van Dyke BP, Torres CA, Burns JW, Kim M, Newman AK, Campbell LC, Anderson B, Block PR, Bobrow BJ, Brooks R, Burton TT, Cheavens JS, DeMonte CM, DeMonte WD, Edwards CS, Jeong M, Mulla MM, Penn T, Smith LJ, Tucker DH. Literacy-Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Education for Chronic Pain at Low-Income Clinics: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Apr 3;168(7):471-480. doi: 10.7326/M17-0972. Epub 2018 Feb 27.

  • Newman AK, Van Dyke BP, Torres CA, Baxter JW, Eyer JC, Kapoor S, Thorn BE. The relationship of sociodemographic and psychological variables with chronic pain variables in a low-income population. Pain. 2017 Sep;158(9):1687-1696. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000964.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Chronic PainPainBack PainLiteracy

Interventions

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyStandard of CareTherapeutics

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsCommunicationBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesQuality Indicators, Health CareQuality of Health CareHealth Services AdministrationHealth Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation

Results Point of Contact

Title
Beverly E. Thorn, Ph.D.
Organization
University of Alabama

Study Officials

  • Beverly E. Thorn, Ph.D.

    University of Alabama at Birmingham

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Joshua C. Eyer, Ph.D.

    University of Alabama at Birmingham

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2013

First Posted

October 22, 2013

Study Start

September 12, 2013

Primary Completion

February 1, 2016

Study Completion

December 1, 2016

Last Updated

June 21, 2017

Results First Posted

March 7, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The complete data set may be obtained by request from the PI. The dataset will be available in November.

Locations