RIFL (Rigid and Flexing Laryngoscope) vs. Fiberoptic Bronchoscope
1 other identifier
interventional
41
1 country
1
Brief Summary
We will conduct a randomized trial comparing the success rate and time to intubation using the RIFL vs. the fiberoptic bronchoscope, as the latter is commonly held to be the gold standard of difficult airway devices. Specifically, we wish to compare the of intubation between the two devices in patients with potentially difficult airways as defined by an oropharyngeal class 3-4, BMI greater than 35, or in patients with a history of difficult intubation using direct laryngoscopy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2012
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 16, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 18, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 5, 2017
CompletedJanuary 5, 2017
October 1, 2016
10 months
October 16, 2013
June 4, 2015
November 5, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time Until Proper Endotracheal Tube Placement
Time (in seconds) from first placement of the intubating scope in the oral cavity until proper endotracheal tube placement is confirmed by the presence of End Tidal Co2 (etCO2). Time to successful intubation was defined as the period from when the tip of the RIFL or FOB passed the incisors until withdrawal past that same point after successful intubation.
usually <100 seconds
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Number of Participants With Successful Intubation
<100 seconds
Number of Attempts Performed During Airway Management
<100 seconds
Grade of Glottic View
<100 seconds
Assistance Maneuvers, if Any, Provided by the Attending Anesthesiologist
<100 seconds
Lowest Pulse Oximetry Saturation Value Reading During Intubation
<100 seconds
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Oropharyngeal Injuries
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
RIFL (Rigid and Flexing Laryngoscope)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in the RIFL group will undergo bronchoscopy using the Rigid and Flexing Laryngoscope. Once the carina is visualized with the bronchoscope, the endotracheal tube will be advanced, and the bronchoscope removed.
Fiberoptic Bronchoscope
OTHERPatients in the control group will undergo bronchoscopy using the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope. Once the carina is visualized with the bronchoscope, the endotracheal tube will be advanced, and the bronchoscope removed.
Interventions
Patients in the RIFL group will undergo bronchoscopy using the Rigid and Flexing Laryngoscope. Once the carina is visualized with the bronchoscope, the endotracheal tube will be advanced, and the bronchoscope removed.
Patients in the control group will undergo bronchoscopy using the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope. Once the carina is visualized with the bronchoscope, the endotracheal tube will be advanced, and the bronchoscope removed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with known or suspected difficult airways defined as:
- patients with an oropharyngeal score of 3 or 4
- patients whose body mass index calculates greater to or equal to 35
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who necessitate an awake fiberoptic intubation or a rapid sequence intubation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Bret Alvis, MD
- Organization
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bret Alvis, M.D.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Fellow
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 16, 2013
First Posted
October 18, 2013
Study Start
September 1, 2012
Primary Completion
July 1, 2013
Study Completion
July 1, 2013
Last Updated
January 5, 2017
Results First Posted
January 5, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-10