NCT01965860

Brief Summary

To design, validate and prove cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive endovascular simulation curriculum consisting of cognitive and psychomotor skills training for endovascular management of symptomatic vascular disease in the lower limbs.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
39

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 15, 2013

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 18, 2013

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2014

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2016

Completed
5.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 16, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

March 16, 2021

Status Verified

January 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

October 15, 2013

Results QC Date

December 15, 2020

Last Update Submit

February 23, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Technical and Global Performance of the Surgical Trainee in Real Life Procedures

    The consultant will assess the trainee during the intervention. * Global Rating Scale of Endovascular Performance (Range 11-55): to rate the global performance - modified OSATS (Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills) scale * Examiner Checklist for Diagnostic Angiography, Angioplasty and Stenting (Range 17-85): to rate the technical performance For both scales, the higher the score, the better. Surrogate measures of performance are also evaluated (total procedure and fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, contrast volume and number of endovascular tools used). Post-hoc videos of hand movements and the fluoroscopy imaging recorded during the real procedure will be rated using the same scoring systems. Two real life endovascular procedures will be performed within six weeks after completing the curriculum. Evaluation will occur during the intervention and videos of hand movements and fluoroscopy imaging will be evaluated afterwards.

    6 weeks after intervention

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Improved Knowledge and Technical Performance of the Surgical Trainee on a Simulated Complex Module

    Pre curriculum, 6 weeks and 3 months after completion of the curriculum (3 months only for intervention arms)

Other Outcomes (1)

  • PROSPECT Proficiency

    After RCT

Study Arms (3)

PROSPECT

EXPERIMENTAL

the trainee will study four modules of E-learning (basic endovascular skills module, iliac artery module, superficial femoral artery module and postoperative care module). After studying each module the trainee will complete a Multiple Choice Questionnaire and perform a simple and a complex exercise on the simulator.

Other: additional curriculum (E-learning + simulation)

CONTROL

NO INTERVENTION

The trainee will continue clinical education without additional curriculum, but will be allowed to study independently.

E-LEARNING

EXPERIMENTAL

the trainee will study four modules of E-learning (basic endovascular skills module, iliac artery module, superficial femoral artery module and postoperative care module). After studying each module the trainee will complete a Multiple Choice Questionnaire, no simulation.

Other: additional E-learning

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Surgical trainee
  • Knowledge and technical skill level evaluated
  • Demographics questionnaire and general MCQ test completed
  • endovascular simulated exercises completed after familiarization with the simulator

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ghent University Hospital

Ghent, 9000, Belgium

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Maertens H, Aggarwal R, Desender L, Vermassen F, Van Herzeele I. Development of a PROficiency-Based StePwise Endovascular Curricular Training (PROSPECT) Program. J Surg Educ. 2016 Jan-Feb;73(1):51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Aug 11.

    PMID: 26276301BACKGROUND
  • Maertens H, Aggarwal R, Moreels N, Vermassen F, Van Herzeele I. A Proficiency Based Stepwise Endovascular Curricular Training (PROSPECT) Program Enhances Operative Performance in Real Life: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Sep;54(3):387-396. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jul 19.

  • Maertens H, Vermassen F, Aggarwal R, Doyen B, Desender L, Van Herzeele I, Annemans L. Endovascular Training Using a Simulation Based Curriculum is Less Expensive than Training in the Hybrid Angiosuite. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Oct;56(4):583-590. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.07.011. Epub 2018 Aug 18.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Vascular Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cardiovascular Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

* Single centre, results may not be applicable to other centres/countries. * Randomisation status was not blinded for participants, consultant can unintentionally know randomisation group. * Long-term skills retention was not assessed beyond 3 months post-training. * As the procedures were closely supervised, operative metrics cannot be used to assess the operative performance.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Prof. Dr. Isabelle Van Herzeele
Organization
Ghent University

Study Officials

  • Isabelle Van Herzeele, MD, PhD

    University Ghent

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Initially 39 participants were enrolled, 7 excluded because they declined to participate. 32 people were randomized.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2013

First Posted

October 18, 2013

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion

February 1, 2016

Study Completion

February 1, 2016

Last Updated

March 16, 2021

Results First Posted

March 16, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-01

Locations