Compare Articaine 1:100.000, 4% Epinephrine, Subperiosteal With Loco-regional Anesthesia for Placing Dental Implants in Posterior Mandible - Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
88
1 country
1
Study Start
April 1, 2017
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
August 2023
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
August 2024
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
In patients that are going to receive a dental implant in the posterior mandible (distal from canine), does the subperiosteal anesthetic technique with Articaine 1:100.000 4 % Epinephrine compared to the loco-regional one, produces the same analgesia during surgery ?
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
August 2024
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
October 12, 2013
Actual (reported)October 16, 2013
Actual (reported)April 1, 2017
Actual (reported)August 2023
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
August 2024
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Anesthesia efficiency
Evaluate subperiosteal vs loco-regional anesthesia for implant installation in posterior mandible. It will be measured by the amount (mean) of anesthesia pre and intraoperatory
During Surgery for Dental Implant installation
Intraoperatory Pain
During Surgery for Implant Installation in posterior mandible
Intraoperatory Anesthesia Complications
During Surgery for implant installation in posterior mandible
Administer Subperiosteal 1:100.000 Articaine 4% epinephrine, buccal and lingually, for Dental Implants in Posterior mandible
Administer Loco-regional 1:100.000 articaine 4% epinephrine, for Dental Implants in Posterior Mandible
Place dental implants in posterior mandible, distal from canine, according to manufacturer recommendations
Instituto de Implantologia
Lisbon, 1500-662, Portugal
Andre Chen, Msc
Implantology Institute
João Caramês, Phd
Implantology Institute
Helena Francisco, Msc
Implantology Institute
Elena Cervino, Msc
Implantology Institute
First Submitted
October 12, 2013
First Posted
October 16, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2017
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
August 2023
Estimated (date passed)Multi-level Dimensional Changes at Immediate Implant Sites
Post-Operatory Outcome Changes
Baseline (T0) 3 Days (T1) 10 Days (T2)
Time of Surgery
During Surgical Procedure
Distance To Inferior Alveolar Nerve (IAN)
Post operative Panoramic radiograph
Osseointegration
At 8 Weeks post-surgery
Administration of subperiosteal anesthesia for implant placement
Administer loco-regional anesthesia for implant placement in posterior mandible
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
August 2024
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Last Updated
April 21, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: