NCT01962480

Brief Summary

Introduction: Closure of the hernia gap in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair before mesh reinforcement has gained increasing acceptance among surgeons despite creating a tension-based repair. Beneficial effects of this technique have sporadically been reported but no evidence is available from randomized controlled trials. The primary purpose is to compare early postoperative activity-related pain in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair with closure of the gap with patients undergoing standard laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (non-closure of the gap). Secondary outcomes are cosmesis and hernia-related quality of life (QoL) at 30-days and clinical or radiological recurrence and chronic pain after 2 years. Material and Methods: A randomized, controlled, double-blinded study is planned. Based on power calculation we will include 40 patients in each arm. Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic umbilical, epigastric, or umbilical trocar-site hernia repair at Hvidovre Hospital, Herlev Hospital, or Køge Hospital, who meet the inclusion criteria, are invited to participate. Conclusion: The technique with closure of the gap may induce more postoperative pain, but may be superior with regard to other important surgical outcomes. No studies have previously investigated closure of the gap in the setting of a randomised controlled trial.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 7, 2013

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 14, 2013

Completed
18 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2013

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2016

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 22, 2019

Status Verified

February 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

October 7, 2013

Last Update Submit

February 21, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain at mobilisation from lying to sitting position measured with Visual Analogue Scale

    24 hrs postoperatively

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Cosmetic result measured with verbal rating scale and numeric rating scales

    measured 30 days postoperatively

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Hernia-specific quality of life

    measured 30 days postoperatively

  • complications, readmittance, and general practitioner visits

    30-days postoperatively

  • clinical recurrence

    2 years

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

sutured closure of the hernia gap

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The hernia gap is sutured intracorporally

Procedure: The hernia gap is sutured intracorporally

No closure of the hernia gap

NO INTERVENTION

Physiomesh is placed with at least 5 cm overlap of the gap and fixated with double crown technique

Interventions

The hernia gab is closed with non-absorbable suture (Ethibond Excel 2-0, Ethicon, Johnson \& Johnson©) performed by an intracorporally interrupted sutured technique using an Auto Suture© Endo-Slide knot-tying instrument. The stitches are placed with a distance of 0.5 - 1 cm from the fascial edges and with a distance of 0.5-1 cm. between the stitches, performed under a 6-8 mmHg intrabdominal pressure.

sutured closure of the hernia gap

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Elective, primary or recurrent laparoscopic umbilical or epigastric hernia repair, umbilical trocar-site hernia and epigastric hernia repair where laparoscopic hernia repair is no contraindication (i.e. previous laparotomy with anticipated severe and dense adhesions
  • Hernia defect between 2-6 cm measured preoperatively by the surgeon at the out-patient clinic
  • Maximum 1 defect
  • Patients 18-80 years Patients with technical failure (where it is not possible to suture the defect) or patients who are reoperated due to complications remain included and will stay in their primary assigned randomization group in order to perform an intention to treat (ITT) analysis.

You may not qualify if:

  • Open hernia repair
  • Poor compliance (language problems, dementia and alcohol or drug abuse etc.)
  • Fascia defect \>6 cm (largest diameter, evaluated preoperatively and intra-operatively, thus patients are excluded if the defect is found larger intra-operatively)
  • Emergency repair
  • Chronic pain syndrome (chronic back pain, chronic headache, severe dysmenorrhea, fibromyalgia, whiplash or other conditions requiring daily opioid medication)
  • Daily consumption of opioids (for the last 3 weeks up till the operation)
  • Decompensated liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh B-C)
  • If the hernia repair is secondarily to another surgical procedure

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hvidovre University Hospital

Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B, Seiler CM, Miserez M. Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16;(3):CD007781. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007781.pub2.

    PMID: 21412910BACKGROUND
  • Christoffersen MW, Westen M, Rosenberg J, Helgstrand F, Bisgaard T. Closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2020 Feb;107(3):200-208. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11490.

  • Christoffersen MW, Westen M, Assadzadeh S, Deigaard SL, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T. The clinical effects of closure of the hernia gap after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Dan Med J. 2014 Jun;61(6):A4865.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hernia, Ventral

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hernia, AbdominalHerniaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Mette Christoffersen, M.D.

    Individual Purchaser

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
M.D, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2013

First Posted

October 14, 2013

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion

August 1, 2016

Study Completion

February 1, 2019

Last Updated

February 22, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations