NCT01961219

Brief Summary

Shoulder pain is one of the most common causes of musculoskeletal disability in the adult population. Adhesive capsulitis is one of a multitude of reasons that can cause shoulder pain and dysfunction. It is a painful and disabling condition that can cause frustration for patients and caregivers due to slow recovery time. It is important to meticulously diagnose the source of the symptoms. Adhesive capsulitis is treatment by non-operative therapies such as physical therapy, exercise, steroids \& pain medications. For some patients a quicker return to function is necessary; in th is situation an operative treatment is an option. This study will compare two surgical techniques for adhesive capsulitis. Purpose

  1. 1.To directly compare outcomes of patients with adhesive capsulitis who have failed pain management and failed improvement in range of motion after at least 3 months of supervised, regimented conservative treatment and have subsequently been randomized to either closed manipulation under anesthesia or arthroscopic capsular release.
  2. 2.To blind both patient and assessing physician/nurse study coordinator to the treatment that was received for the duration of the study. This will reduce the effect of any potential bias on the results as much as possible.
  3. 3.To collect outcome data, both subjectively from the patient using proven outcome measures, and objectively from regularly spaced follow up visits with blinded assessors.
  4. 4.To collect and comment on data from the two treatment groups regarding duration of post-operative narcotic use, duration of post-operative physical therapy required, post-operative pain levels, and elapsed time until back to work/activity post-operatively.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
13

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 4, 2013

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 11, 2013

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2013

Completed
8.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 25, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 25, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

November 2, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

8.5 years

First QC Date

October 4, 2013

Last Update Submit

October 31, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • quick Disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (quickDASH) score.

    The primary analysis will compare the quickDASH score at the twelve month evaluation between closed manipulation under anesthesia and arthroscopic capsular release using analysis of covariance using the baseline assessment of quickDASH ast he covariate

    12 months post-operatively

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • quickDASH score

    2 weeks post-operatively

  • quickDASH score

    4 weeks post-operatively

  • quickDASH score

    6 weeks post-operatively

  • quickDASH score

    12 weeks post-operatively

  • quickDASH

    6 months post-operatively

Study Arms (2)

Adhesive Capsulitis with MUA

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects with idiopathic adhesive capsulitis in the "frozen" or "thawing" phase who have failed pain management and failed improvement in range of motion after at least 3 months of supervised, regimented conservative treatment; or who after less than 3 months of conservative treatment demand a quicker return to function. Treatment closed manipulation under anesthesia.

Procedure: Manipulation Under Anesthesia

Adhesive Capsulitis with Arthroscopy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects with idiopathic adhesive capsulitis in the "frozen" or "thawing" phase who have failed pain management and failed improvement in range of motion after at least 3 months of supervised, regimented conservative treatment; or who after less than 3 months of conservative treatment demand a quicker return to function. Treatment Arthroscopic Capsular Release

Procedure: Arthroscopic capsular release

Interventions

Closed manipulation under anesthesia.

Also known as: MUA
Adhesive Capsulitis with MUA

Arthroscopic capsular release

Adhesive Capsulitis with Arthroscopy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients must be diagnosed as having idiopathic adhesive capsulitis in the 'frozen' or 'thawing' phase of disease and have tried and failed at least 3 months of nonoperative therapy.
  • patient with adhesive capsulitis who presents already in the 'frozen' or 'thawing' phase who demands a quicker return to function and will not try 3 months of nonoperative therapy first.
  • Age 18 or older

You may not qualify if:

  • pregnancy
  • previously operated shoulder (same side)
  • other documented source of shoulder pain and stiffness (same side)
  • rotator cuff tear (same side)
  • glenohumeral osteoarthritis (same side)
  • calcific tendonitis (same side)
  • impingement (same side)
  • osteonecrosis
  • neoplasm
  • cervical radiculopathy
  • patients who are medically unfit to undergo a general anesthetic
  • patients who are unable to comply with the post-operative protocol
  • non-English Speaking patients

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Truman Medical Centers

Kansas City, Missouri, 64108, United States

Location

Related Publications (26)

  • Neviaser AS, Hannafin JA. Adhesive capsulitis: a review of current treatment. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2346-56. doi: 10.1177/0363546509348048. Epub 2010 Jan 28.

    PMID: 20110457BACKGROUND
  • Neviaser JS: Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. JBJS 1945;27:211-222.

    BACKGROUND
  • Neviaser RJ, Neviaser TJ. The frozen shoulder. Diagnosis and management. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Oct;(223):59-64.

    PMID: 3652593BACKGROUND
  • Emig EW, Schweitzer ME, Karasick D, Lubowitz J. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: MR diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Jun;164(6):1457-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.6.7754892.

    PMID: 7754892BACKGROUND
  • Sofka CM, Ciavarra GA, Hannafin JA, Cordasco FA, Potter HG. Magnetic resonance imaging of adhesive capsulitis: correlation with clinical staging. HSS J. 2008 Sep;4(2):164-9. doi: 10.1007/s11420-008-9088-1. Epub 2008 Aug 20.

    PMID: 18815860BACKGROUND
  • Miller MD, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA Jr. Thawing the frozen shoulder: the "patient" patient. Orthopedics. 1996 Oct;19(10):849-53. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19961001-06.

    PMID: 8905857BACKGROUND
  • Griggs SM, Ahn A, Green A. Idiopathic adhesive capsulitis. A prospective functional outcome study of nonoperative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Oct;82(10):1398-407.

    PMID: 11057467BACKGROUND
  • Shaffer B, Tibone JE, Kerlan RK. Frozen shoulder. A long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Jun;74(5):738-46.

    PMID: 1624489BACKGROUND
  • Levine WN, Kashyap CP, Bak SF, Ahmad CS, Blaine TA, Bigliani LU. Nonoperative management of idiopathic adhesive capsulitis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 Sep-Oct;16(5):569-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.12.007. Epub 2007 May 24.

    PMID: 17531513BACKGROUND
  • Jones DS, Chattopadhyay C. Suprascapular nerve block for the treatment of frozen shoulder in primary care: a randomized trial. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jan;49(438):39-41.

    PMID: 10622015BACKGROUND
  • Dodenhoff RM, Levy O, Wilson A, Copeland SA. Manipulation under anesthesia for primary frozen shoulder: effect on early recovery and return to activity. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000 Jan-Feb;9(1):23-6. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(00)90005-3.

    PMID: 10717858BACKGROUND
  • Farrell CM, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Manipulation for frozen shoulder: long-term results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Sep-Oct;14(5):480-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.02.012.

    PMID: 16194738BACKGROUND
  • Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Biggs DJ, Fitsialos DP, MacKay M. The resistant frozen shoulder. Manipulation versus arthroscopic release. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Oct;(319):238-48.

    PMID: 7554636BACKGROUND
  • Pollock RG, Duralde XA, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU. The use of arthroscopy in the treatment of resistant frozen shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jul;(304):30-6.

    PMID: 8020231BACKGROUND
  • Warner JJ, Allen AA, Marks PH, Wong P. Arthroscopic release of postoperative capsular contracture of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Aug;79(8):1151-8. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199708000-00006.

    PMID: 9278074BACKGROUND
  • Ozbaydar MU, Tonbul M, Altun M, Yalaman O. [Arthroscopic selective capsular release in the treatment of frozen shoulder]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2005;39(2):104-13. Turkish.

    PMID: 15925932BACKGROUND
  • Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN; Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May;87(5):1038-46. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02060.

    PMID: 15866967BACKGROUND
  • Williams GN, Gangel TJ, Arciero RA, Uhorchak JM, Taylor DC. Comparison of the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation method and two shoulder rating scales. Outcomes measures after shoulder surgery. Am J Sports Med. 1999 Mar-Apr;27(2):214-21. doi: 10.1177/03635465990270021701.

    PMID: 10102104BACKGROUND
  • Hayes K, Walton JR, Szomor ZR, Murrell GA. Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion. Aust J Physiother. 2001;47(4):289-94. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60274-9.

    PMID: 11722295BACKGROUND
  • Hsu JE, Anakwenze OA, Warrender WJ, Abboud JA. Current review of adhesive capsulitis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Apr;20(3):502-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.023. Epub 2010 Dec 16. No abstract available.

    PMID: 21167743BACKGROUND
  • Neviaser AS, Neviaser RJ. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Sep;19(9):536-42. doi: 10.5435/00124635-201109000-00004.

    PMID: 21885699BACKGROUND
  • Vickers AJ. How to randomize. J Soc Integr Oncol. 2006 Fall;4(4):194-8. doi: 10.2310/7200.2006.023.

    PMID: 17022927BACKGROUND
  • Campbell MK, Entwistle VA, Cuthbertson BH, Skea ZC, Sutherland AG, McDonald AM, Norrie JD, Carlson RV, Bridgman S; KORAL study group. Developing a placebo-controlled trial in surgery: issues of design, acceptability and feasibility. Trials. 2011 Feb 21;12:50. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-50.

    PMID: 21338481BACKGROUND
  • Dempsey AL, Mills T, Karsch RM, Branch TP. Maximizing total end range time is safe and effective for the conservative treatment of frozen shoulder patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Sep;90(9):738-45. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318214ed0d.

    PMID: 21430510BACKGROUND
  • Angst F, Schwyzer HK, Aeschlimann A, Simmen BR, Goldhahn J. Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S174-88. doi: 10.1002/acr.20630. No abstract available.

    PMID: 22588743BACKGROUND
  • Wright RW, Baumgarten KM. Shoulder outcomes measures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010 Jul;18(7):436-44. doi: 10.5435/00124635-201007000-00006.

    PMID: 20595136BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Bursitis

Interventions

Joint Capsule Release

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Joint DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthroscopyEndoscopyMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeOrthopedic Procedures

Study Officials

  • Akin Cil, MD

    University of Missouri-Kansas City Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
M.D.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2013

First Posted

October 11, 2013

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion

April 25, 2022

Study Completion

April 25, 2022

Last Updated

November 2, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-10

Locations