Comparison of Redo PVI With vs. Without Renal Denervation for Recurrent AF After Initial PVI
Randomized Comparison of Redo Pulmonary Vein Isolation With vs. Without Renal Denervation for Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation After Initial Pulmonary Vein Isolation
1 other identifier
interventional
60
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare the elimination of atrial fibrillation in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation despite prior pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) when undergoing repeat PVI (control) vs repeat PVI plus renal denervation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 atrial-fibrillation
Started Sep 2013
Typical duration for phase_2 atrial-fibrillation
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 7, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 10, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedSeptember 23, 2015
September 1, 2015
2.8 years
October 7, 2013
September 21, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The absence of AF
The absence of AF at one year as assessed by prolonged ambulatory ECG monitoring post-ablation after 3 month blanking period has expired following the repeat ablation procedure.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Systolic and diastolic blood pressures
1 year
procedural duration and complications
1 year
LV mass on echocardiogram
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Redo PVI
ACTIVE COMPARATORTherapeutic anticoagulation will be required for at least 3 weeks prior to ablation. An MRA will be performed to define cardiac and PV anatomy. Standard ablation technique will be employed. After gaining venous access, double transseptal puncture will be performed to permit left atrial access, guided by intracardiac ultrasound. A circular mapping catheter will be placed in each PV and any reconnections will be ablated by delivery of RF energy. Confirmation of re-isolation of all PVs will be performed at the conclusion of the procedure.
PVI + RDN
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll patients who are randomized to Group II will undergo redo PVI exactly as described above. At the conclusion of PVI, RDN will be performed. Real-time 3-dimensional aorta-renal artery maps will be constructed with the use of the same navigation system and catheter used for PVI after femoral artery access. Both mapping and ablation will performed under the same modified sedation. RF ablations of 8 to 10 watts will be applied discretely from the first distal main renal artery bifurcation all the way back to the ostium, for 2 min, and up to 6 lesions (separated by ≥ 5 mm). Lesions will be made both longitudinally and rotationally within each renal artery. To confirm renal denervation, high-frequency stimulation (HFS) will be used before the initial and after each RF delivery within the renal artery. RDN will be considered to have been achieved when the sudden increase of blood pressure (≥ 15 mm Hg from invasive arterial monitoring) is absent.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Prior PVI ablation procedure for paroxysmal AF within past 2 years
- Recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal AF despite prior PVI
- History of essential hypertension requiring at least 2 chronic antihypertensive medications
You may not qualify if:
- Persistent AF after prior ablation
- Congestive heart failure (NYHA III-IV functional class)
- Left ventricle ejection fraction \< 35%
- Left atrial diameter \>55 mm
- An estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 45mL/min/1.73m2, using the MDRD calculation
- Renal arteries unsuitable for RDN:
- Inability to access renal vasculature
- Main renal arteries \< 4 mm in diameter or \< 20 mm in length.
- Hemodynamically or anatomically significant renal artery abnormality or stenosis in either renal artery
- A history of prior renal artery intervention including balloon angioplasty or stenting that precludes a possibility of ablation treatment
- Multiple main renal arteries to either kidney
- Unwillingness to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States
State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Novosibirsk, 630055, Russia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jonathan S. Steinberg, MD
University of Rochester
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 7, 2013
First Posted
October 10, 2013
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 23, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-09