NCT01897545

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is the comparative evaluation of systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering, atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence and clinical data in patients with paroxysmal/persistent AF and resistant/non-resistant hypertension, undergoing AF ablation alone or combined with percutaneous renal denervation.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2012

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
3 countries

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2012

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2013

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 3, 2013

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 12, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

October 9, 2013

Status Verified

October 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

July 3, 2013

Last Update Submit

October 8, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Arterial hypertensionAtrial FibrillationPercutaneous renal denervation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • recurrence of > 30 secs of atrial tachyarrhythmia, including AF and left atrial flutter/tachycardia, after a single ablation procedure on no antiarrhythmic drug

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • office blood pressure

    1 year

  • safety data before and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after procedure

    1 year

Study Arms (2)

PV isolation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: Circumferential PV isolation

PV isolation+renal denervation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: PV isolation+renal denervation

Interventions

The left atrium (LA) and pulmonary veins (PVs) are explored through a transeptal approach. Real-time 3D LA maps are reconstructed by using a nonfluoroscopic navigation system. The ipsilateral left and right PVs are encircled in one lesion line by circumferential PV isolation. Radiofrequency energy is delivered at 43°C, 35 W, 0.5 cm away from the PV ostia at the anterior wall, and is reduced to 43°C, 30 W, 1 cm away from the PV ostia at the posterior wall, with a saline irrigation speed of 17 mL/min. Each lesion is ablated continuously until the local potential amplitude decreased by \>80% or RF energy deliveries exceeded 40 s. The endpoint of circumferential PV isolation is PV isolation. Additional ablation lines are created by connecting the left inferior PV to the mitral annulus (mitral isthmus) and the roof of the LA between the two superior PVs. After the end of the procedure the implantable loop recorder is implanted in the parasternal area of the chest.

PV isolation

The procedure of AF ablation is the same like in the circumferential PV isolation. After AF ablation procedure, the angiogram of both renal arteries is performed via femoral access. After that the treatment catheter is introduced into each renal artery and is applied discrete, radiofrequency ablations lasting up to 2 min each and of 8 watts or less to obtain up to six ablations separated both longitudinally and rotationally within each renal artery. During ablation, the catheter system monitored tip temperature and impedance, altering radiofrequency energy delivery in response to a predetermined algorithm. After the procedure the control arterial angiogram should be done.

PV isolation+renal denervation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Symptomatic drug-refractory AF (with history of failure of ≥2 class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs) in patients referred for catheter ablation of AF
  • PAF with ≥1 monthly episodes or PersAF in patients who had already undergone ≥3 electrical cardioversions. PAF was defined as episodes lasting less than 7 days with spontaneous termination. PersAF was defined as lasting more than 7 days before being terminated pharmacologically or by electrical cardioversion.
  • Office-based systolic blood pressure of ≥140/90 mm Hg, despite treatment with 3 antihypertensive drugs (including 1 diuretic)
  • A glomerular filtration rate ≥45 mL/min/1⋅73 m2, with modification of diet using a renal disease formula

You may not qualify if:

  • Secondary causes of hypertension
  • Severe renal artery stenosis or dual renal arteries
  • Congestive heart failure with NYHA II-IV symptoms
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction \<35%
  • Transverse left atrial diameter \> 60 mm on transthoracic echocardiography
  • Previous AF ablation procedure
  • Treatment with amiodarone
  • Previous renal artery stenting or angioplasty
  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

The Valley Health System

New York, New York, United States

Location

Athens Euroclinic

Athens, 11528, Greece

Location

State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology

Novosibirsk, 630055, Russia

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Pokushalov E, Romanov A, Katritsis DG, Artyomenko S, Bayramova S, Losik D, Baranova V, Karaskov A, Steinberg JS. Renal denervation for improving outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and hypertension: early experience. Heart Rhythm. 2014 Jul;11(7):1131-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.03.055. Epub 2014 Mar 29.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HypertensionAtrial Fibrillation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
NETWORK
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2013

First Posted

July 12, 2013

Study Start

April 1, 2012

Primary Completion

April 1, 2013

Study Completion

June 1, 2013

Last Updated

October 9, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-10

Locations